Hello
; DiG 9.2.0 relays.osirusoft.com txt
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 39308
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 4, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;relays.osirusoft.com. IN TXT
;; ANSWER
returning 127.0.0.2 for everything would be an ugly way to bow out.
yes, but it's been done before.
Someone has been in contact with Joe via phone and posted
to another mailing list That Zhall Not Be Named that
exactly that is happening. The zone is dead, he's put
*.*.*.* in, he's asking
George William Herbert wrote:
Yes, this is due to a massive DDOS. At least three
of the spamfilter BLs have been so attacked this week.
Some of the networks represented here have not been
as timely about helping the BL providers with the
DDOSes as they could be. Please keep in mind that
without
I hope the nanog mail list is an OK place to warn of this..
As part of my clean up for clients who have had Blaster, I came across a
variant, sometimes called Blaster D. Its other name is welchia.
It seems to do the following:
Gets the Microsoft patch for regular blaster. Installs a
Fun rant from a qwest dial up reseller
Regards,
Christopher J. Wolff, VP CIO
Broadband Laboratories, Inc.
http://www.bblabs.com
-Original Message-
From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 1:45 PM
To: Cho, Mary M
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL
And now look, all the plaintext e-mail addresses are posted to a mailing
list. Which is archived on the web!
Nice!
On 8/26/03 4:45 PM, Matthew Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
George William Herbert wrote:
Yes, this is due to a massive DDOS. At least three
of the spamfilter BLs have been so attacked this week.
Some of the networks represented here have not been
as timely about helping the BL
Geez, all I wanted was a little help, and I get pounced on by a
platoon of eager Sprint BGP gurus.
The desired filter change, it is done, and Sprint, who has always been
my first choice as a provider, just lengthened their lead a little more.
neal rauhauser wrote:
I could
Hello,
Did anyone recently see anyone from fast.net that does not get
confused by show ip bgp prefix output or did the bankruptcy force them
to cut payroll so much that they cannot afford anyone but a Chubb Institute
type?
Thanks,
Alex
I could really use an assist from someone at Sprint - I'm a
consultant for an AS that receives service from two ISPs who peer with
Sprint. One of them is a healthy regional who listens to me about BGP,
the other, well, I wish them the best of luck, but we really, really,
really want to put a
although this has to do with spam, i think folks will agree that there's
operational content here:
relays.osirusoft.com is down, it's history, stop using it.
it is currently returning 127.0.0.2 for everything, so if you're using it,
you won't receive this, but at least those who don't use it
/me counts number of sales people on NANOG list..
Oh gee, time for those reseller people to expect more emails with sales inquiries.
-hc
--
Sincerely,
Haesu C.
TowardEX Technologies, Inc.
WWW: http://www.towardex.com
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cell: (978) 394-2867
On Tue, Aug 26,
Yo Richard!
returning 127.0.0.2 for everything would be an ugly way to bow out.
I am just seeing timeouts for XXX.relays.osirusoft.com now.
RGDS
GARY
---
Gary E. Miller Rellim 20340 Empire Blvd, Suite E-3, Bend, OR 97701
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 20:59:22 -0400 (EDT) Mark Jeftovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Returning 127.0.0.2 on everything would indeed be an ugly way to bow
out, but its been done before. Another RBL went out the same way
previously, can't remember which one (was it orbz?)
it was more complicated
--On Tuesday, August 26, 2003 9:35 AM -0400 Leo Bicknell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Almost everyone filters customers. The large ISP's all have the
same opinion, if small to medium sized players abuse the system
they get depeered and become someone's customer aggressively filtered.
The large
ok so this part does not mystify me...
Someone has been in contact with Joe via phone and posted
to another mailing list That Zhall Not Be Named that
exactly that is happening. The zone is dead, ...
...because running blackhole lists is surprisingly more hard
than most people think.
At 04:03 PM 8/25/2003, Andy Walden wrote:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Henry Linneweh wrote:
Microsoft has a task scheduler that people should learn to use to remind
them to check update to make sure their patches are current, it is
located in the control panel and labled Scheduled Tasks and has an
In a message written on Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 12:15:18AM -0400, John Payne wrote:
If this is true, then why do the european NAP mailing lists (which push IRR
filtering) have an almost constant stream of oops, our customer announced
everything to us and we leaked it.
Because European naps have
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Geo. wrote:
Someone on this list had mentioned a network card for the Max TNT that made
it immune to the nachia worm ping issue.
Is that the 4 port (3 ethernet, 1 fast ether) card or the single port card
with the dongle thing or something else?
It turns out this was
On woensdag, aug 27, 2003, at 13:54 Europe/Amsterdam, Matthew Sullivan
wrote:
Someone has suggested 'anycasting' what do people (particually you
Paul)
think of using anycasting for a DNSbl? (- AS112 anyone?) I think it
may
work well... however I am a novice in terms of BGP... As far as I can
--On Wednesday, August 27, 2003 7:53 AM -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mail was delayed (and servers put under heavy load waiting for DNS
queries to time out) when MAPS finally shut off free access
without warning (a week or more after they originally had warned
they'd do it, but gave
Someone has suggested 'anycasting' what do people (particually you
Paul) think of using anycasting for a DNSbl? (- AS112 anyone?)
unowned anycast, such as that used in as112, is only possible when the
replies have no value (and thus need not be synchronized or centrally
authorized.)
Here is a summary of our experiences with the bug.
Last Thursday, A TNTs with years of uptime rebooted. No cause was
apparent, and nothing relevant happened in the logs. On Friday, It
happened to a different TNT. This occurred with increasing frequency
over the weekend, and we didn't get a
In the immortal words of Richard Welty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 15:25:46 -0700 (PDT) Gary E. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
returning 127.0.0.2 for everything would be an ugly way to bow out.
yes, but it's been done before.
And oddly enough, it was a terrible idea the
On Wednesday, August 27, 2003, at 12:46 PM, Ejay Hire wrote:
Here is a summary of our experiences with the bug.
Last Thursday, A TNTs with years of uptime rebooted. No cause was
apparent, and nothing relevant happened in the logs. On Friday, It
happened to a different TNT. This occurred
--On Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:36 AM -0400 Leo Bicknell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message written on Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 12:15:18AM -0400, John Payne
wrote:
If this is true, then why do the european NAP mailing lists (which push
IRR filtering) have an almost constant stream of oops,
Has anyone that works for/ owns an isp blocked any ports regarding this
new/old virus threat?
Wes Vaux, CCNA, CCDA
Network Security Engineer,
9000 Regency Pkwy
Ste 500
Cary, NC 27511
t 919.463.6782
Have received complaints from usage-based-billing Internet customers lately
about not wanting to pay for the nuisance traffic caused by worm-of-the-day.
I believe that in the case of a short-duration, targeted attack that can be
eventually be stopped, a billing credit is probably appropriate.
--On Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:36 AM -0400 Leo Bicknell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message written on Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 12:15:18AM -0400, John Payne
wrote:
If this is true, then why do the european NAP mailing lists (which push
IRR filtering) have an almost constant stream
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone could provide any advice or suggestions on
shipping heavy/bulky equipment (~300 pounds, about a half-rack worth of
gear) on short notice cross-country? We're obviously looking to minimize
cost, but realistically it can't be in transit for more than two days.
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Raymond, Steven wrote:
Have received complaints from usage-based-billing Internet customers lately
about not wanting to pay for the nuisance traffic caused by worm-of-the-day.
I believe that in the case of a short-duration, targeted attack that can be
eventually be
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Matthew Zito wrote:
I was wondering if anyone could provide any advice or suggestions on
shipping heavy/bulky equipment (~300 pounds, about a half-rack worth of
gear) on short notice cross-country? We're obviously looking to minimize
cost, but realistically it can't be
FWIW we've had FedEx destroy hundreds of thousands of dollars of gear in
transit (all shipped with full insurance and properly packed). They're
extremely slow to pay their insurance claims on large amounts, as well.
This has happened to us at least 5 times so far - cross-country,
cross-state,
Greetings,
I'm serving as the editor of the current BGP-4 MIB. We're trying to
push the MIB through standards. Last call has been issued.
The MIB, as currently documented includes the following four objects:
bgpPeerInUpdates
We've shipped (using Fedex International Freight) 300+lb pallets of Sun gear
without any untoward delays or problems. Multiple times. The pricing was
excellent and the service (once they knew freight was involved) was fine.
I think bad experiences with fedex have more to do with the statistical
Well I recieved lots of computer hardware including laptops/desktops with
fedex when I was living in Turkey from USA without any problem, 300 pounds
is quite heavy and I assume this is a couple of thousands computer gear so
the best would be fedex, imho.
Mehmet Akcin
- Original Message -
I've shipped LOTS of heavy datacenter gear via FedEX cross countryb4 without
problems as well.
-Jim
-Original Message-
From: Deepak Jain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 3:08 PM
To: Matthew Zito; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cross-country shipping of
We are sending out feelers for adding an additional DS-3, or possibly frac
OC-3. One of the responses came back with we won't be competive with
provider because they don't have their own backbone.
Is there a cross-reference for provider vs network backbone, or is this just
something that we
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:36:54 -0400 Nathan J. Mehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the immortal words of Richard Welty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 15:25:46 -0700 (PDT) Gary E. Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
returning 127.0.0.2 for everything would be an ugly way to bow out.
At 11:19 AM 8/27/2003, Matthew Zito wrote:
I was wondering if anyone could provide any advice or suggestions on
shipping heavy/bulky equipment (~300 pounds, about a half-rack worth of
gear) on short notice cross-country? We're obviously looking to minimize
cost, but realistically it can't be
I mean if the traffic were unrealistically to increase so that
bad traffic was
50% of all traffic we would all have to double our circuit and
router capacity
and you either pass that cost on directly (charge for extra
usage) or indirectly
(increase the $ per Mb) to the user.
I think
Hello...
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 12:32, Rick Ernst wrote:
We are sending out feelers for adding an additional DS-3, or possibly frac
OC-3. One of the responses came back with we won't be competive with
provider because they don't have their own backbone.
Is there a cross-reference for
Rick Ernst wrote:
One of the providers we are looking at is Level-3. Any comments good/bad on
reliability and clue? We already have UU, Sprint, and ATT. I also realize
that the they suck less list changes continuously... :)
Look for one which has working abuse department which actually
I have a Level-3 OC-3 in Miami. So far they have proved to be more
stable than my other 2 upstreams. Never had a problem with their
helpdesk either!
Regards,
--
Joel Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] | IP Engineer
http://www.ntera.net/ | Ntera
One of the providers we are looking at is Level-3. Any
comments good/bad on
reliability and clue? We already have UU, Sprint, and ATT.
I also realize
that the they suck less list changes continuously... :)
I have about 5 GB of IP transit connections from Level3 across 8 markets
(plus
I hear that Level 3 is good but do they handle small stuff like T-1?
We may be looking to dual-home soon and will be looking around.
- Original Message -
From: Sean Crandall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Rick Ernst' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 15:48
Does anyone know an escalation contact for Redback's TAC?
Shane Owens
Sr Manager IP/IT Engineering and Network Control Center
EPIK Communications
desk: 407-472-8291
Sowensatepikdotnet
--On Wednesday, August 27, 2003 15:53:44 -0500 John Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I hear that Level 3 is good but do they handle small stuff like T-1?
We may be looking to dual-home soon and will be looking around.
Remember, Level(3) bought (at least some of) genuity/bbn.
I was always
Well don't send messages to a list from an address that you don't want
to receive responses to...
After sending an offlist response:
This is probably because this is an internal account that no one is
supposed to be sending mail to. If you are sending it mail, you are
probably a low-life,
I got some names. Thanks to all that responded.
Shane
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 4:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: Redback contact needed
Does anyone know an escalation contact for Redback's TAC?
Hi there Rick!
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Rick Ernst wrote:
We are sending out feelers for adding an additional DS-3, or possibly frac
OC-3. One of the responses came back with we won't be competive with
provider because they don't have their own backbone.
Alot of carriers that have a
I guess it depends on your traffic type and destination. Level 3 has
a lot of connectivity to content providers such as yahoo and
microsoft. As Joel P pointed out they have been a reliable backbone
with a lot of capacity.
They also have knowledgeable peering people although they lean
I have used Federal Express to great effect in the past. I have tended
to stay away from Airborne because the local people here in Dallas
didn't know not to turn printers full of toner on their sides. Since
Airborne packed them, I felt they should not have been full of toner,
but that is another
53 matches
Mail list logo
