mpls provisioning

2003-09-11 Thread Scylla Malengase
hello, i am interested in peoples recommendations for mpls vpn and te provisioning tools. whatever it is it must support or be extendable to support cisco and juniper hardware and software. i'm particularly interested in home-grown and publicly available tools, especially open source. i'd be qu

RE: Alert to Phone/Pager System

2003-09-11 Thread kwallace
you may want to check out DPS's IAM product. We use it and it's been reliable. They have also been willing to customize things for us in the past- http://dpstele.com/ Regards, Keith -Original Message- From: Allan Liska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 5:46

RE: ISS X-Force MS03-039 Free Scanner

2003-09-11 Thread Ingevaldson, Dan (ISS Atlanta)
We have just released a new version of the scanner that has addressed some reporting inaccuracies. We have also included a MD5 checksum. It is available here: http://www.iss.net/support/product_utilities/Xfrpcss.php Regards, === Daniel Ingevaldson Engineering Manage

Re[2]: Alert to Phone/Pager System

2003-09-11 Thread Allan Liska
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: MD5 Hello Jeffrey, Thursday, September 11, 2003, 5:50:40 PM, you wrote: JM> I may be missing something, but don't monitoring systems (ie, Nagios) JM> have the built-in ability to send out pages w/ a locally attached modem, JM> or SMS (if you setup an ema

Re: Alert to Phone/Pager System

2003-09-11 Thread Shon Elliott
Alan, Try QPAGE. ciao. Shon Elliott Systems Engineer; OptiGate Networks, Inc. Allan Liska wrote: I am looking for a hardware/software solution to a problem and I am hoping someone has implemented something similar: A monitoring system notices an error and sends an alert to a system (the alert

Re: Some very strange network behaviors

2003-09-11 Thread Ray Wong
> Even if a switch floods all ports, it does not change the fact the packet > will not have the correct MAC address and his NIC should never pass it > up the stack. Switches do not rewrite the Ethernet addresses on packets. Correct, ethernet switches do not. The question is, what were the system

Re: Some very strange network behaviors

2003-09-11 Thread Crist Clark
Gregory Hicks wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 13:35:37 -0700 > > From: Crist Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Mike Lewinski wrote: > > > > [...snip...] > > OS's IP stack is misbehaving badly, Zone Alarm should not see the traffic > > on the LAN that does not have his MAC address on it. > > >

Alert to Phone/Pager System

2003-09-11 Thread Allan Liska
I am looking for a hardware/software solution to a problem and I am hoping someone has implemented something similar: A monitoring system notices an error and sends an alert to a system (the alert can be sent over POTS or SMTP). The system recevies the alert and sends out a message (Pager/PO

Re: Some very strange network behaviors

2003-09-11 Thread Gregory Hicks
> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 13:35:37 -0700 > From: Crist Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Mike Lewinski wrote: > > [...snip...] > OS's IP stack is misbehaving badly, Zone Alarm should not see the traffic > on the LAN that does not have his MAC address on it. > > How would a switch/router be deciding

Re: Some very strange network behaviors

2003-09-11 Thread Crist Clark
Mike Lewinski wrote: > > Christopher Bird wrote: > > > This seems strange to me since they are arriving at an IP address that > > is different from mine. > > That's the function of a hub, and the reason why you don't ever want to > send out sensitive information in plaintext. Your neighbor in t

Re: 157.112.0.0/16 ARIN info updated, AT&T still announcing /16

2003-09-11 Thread Chris Lewis
Richard Cox wrote: The other good news is that all those blocks have now been either returned to Aker Kvaerner Group (successors-in-title to Trafalgar House Group) or returned to ARIN for reuse, as appropriate. Any filters you routing people may have put in place to prevent abuse from those bloc

Re: 157.112.0.0/16 ARIN info updated, AT&T still announcing /16

2003-09-11 Thread Dan Hollis
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Kai Schlichting wrote: > AT&T, for lack of presenting any TRO forcing them to keep routing this, > appears to willingly conspire with the Empire Towers IP space hijackers > while presented with overwhelming evidence that whatever forged documents > Empire Towers and Thomas Cow

Re: 157.112.0.0/16 ARIN info updated, AT&T still announcing /16

2003-09-11 Thread Richard Cox
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 16:32 UTC John Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | I stopped seeing 157.112.0.0/16 announced via AT&T earlier this week. So did many people. That route came back again soon afterwards. I have received an assurance directly from senior AT&T management that the route has - in

Re: 157.112.0.0/16 ARIN info updated, AT&T still announcing /16

2003-09-11 Thread Will Yardley
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 12:32:58PM -0400, John Payne wrote: > --On Thursday, September 11, 2003 11:52 AM -0400 Kai Schlichting > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> From the [Hijacked] list: >>> The ARIN information has been updated to have up-to-date contact info for >>> the original owner, the ori

Re: 157.112.0.0/16 ARIN info updated, AT&T still announcing /16

2003-09-11 Thread John Payne
--On Thursday, September 11, 2003 11:52 AM -0400 Kai Schlichting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From the [Hijacked] list: The ARIN information has been updated to have up-to-date contact info for the original owner, the original owners' ISP is announcing 4 /18s but AT&T is still announcing 157.112

157.112.0.0/16 ARIN info updated, AT&T still announcing /16

2003-09-11 Thread Kai Schlichting
>From the [Hijacked] list: > The ARIN information has been updated to have up-to-date contact info for > the original owner, the original owners' ISP is announcing 4 /18s but AT&T > is still announcing 157.112.0.0/16. Can whoever's been bugging AT&T to stop > announcing it to bug them some more?

Re: Some very strange network behaviors

2003-09-11 Thread Mike Lewinski
Christopher Bird wrote: This seems strange to me since they are arriving at an IP address that is different from mine. That's the function of a hub, and the reason why you don't ever want to send out sensitive information in plaintext. Your neighbor in the next room over could run a packet snif

ISS X-Force MS03-039 Free Scanner

2003-09-11 Thread Ingevaldson, Dan (ISS Atlanta)
Please see our X-Force Alert for more information about the new set of MSRPC issues. We have published a free CLI tool to scan for computers vulnerable to MS03-039. X-Force Alert: http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/alerts/id/152 Free Scanner: http://www.iss.net/support/product_utilities/Xfrpcss.php

Re: Some very strange network behaviors

2003-09-11 Thread Stephen J. Wilcox
Whoa stop press! You connected a computer to a public IP and zone alarm starts buzzing away.. FBI! Depends on how the hotel system works, it may be broadcasting or doing some other IP weirdness, either way its not surprising. But there is no security threat from some left over packets from o

Re: Cisco IOS Failure due to Virus

2003-09-11 Thread Stephen J. Wilcox
Hi, we've seen this.. yuo need to make sure you filter the nachi worm 92 byte icmp echo's on your interfaces and it will be fine. The problem seems to be input buffers which use all the memory up for some reason. Steve On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Richard J.Sears wrote: > > Hey Everyone - > > We ha

Migrating DSL Agg from Redback to Cisco

2003-09-11 Thread Nick A Montante
Hello all- We are trying to move all of our DSL aggregation off of a Redback SMS1000 to a Cisco 7513. We are using the PA-A3-T3 card on the Cisco to talk to our DSL subscribers. We are currently running rfc1483 routed and bridged customers on the same ATM DS3 on the Redback. We're trying to fig