Paul,
I've forwarded it to a contact of ours at abuse who should be able to
get it taken care of. I also forwarded the other one from Sean.
- Matt
PS. why is this so hard?
Are you talking about the kitchen sink protocol called DNS, or ...
Specifically, I want to know why Comcast makes itself so hard to reach.
I'll bet I could get them to talk to me about this host if it were DDoS'ing
me, or if I aggressively NMAP'd it at 25Mbits/sec
Back in beta days, the official explanation given was that the DNS
updating was a value add and that it would never be disabled as
a default as a courtesy to corporate customers. Furthermore, MSFT
folks have repeatedly said that the workaround is to simply configure
your nameserver to
The only way to reach Comcast (in my experience) is to get a phone number from
the customer having a problem. Sometimes that is slightly more helpful.
In the recent DC power outage it was clear that my power company did not want
to be reachable. The same is true for at less a couple of the
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 07:00:07PM +0100, Peter Galbavy wrote:
While sitting here watching bad TV, I had a thought(tm).
Has anyone set-up a generic web-page, not linked from anywhere useful, which
autogenerates a contact e-mail address (like [EMAIL PROTECTED]) and
logs which IP reads what
Anyone know whats up with CPAN? http://www.cpan.org points to
http://www.netcetera.dk
Pointers would be appreciated and also if we can trust the CPAN module to
install modules.
==
Eric Germann
I'm not able to duplicate what you report. All indications from
the vectors I've tried are that CPAN is alive and well.
Got more info?
--ra
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 05:10:58PM -0400, Eric Germann said something to the effect of:
Anyone know whats up with CPAN? http://www.cpan.org points to
On 28 Sep 2003, Paul Vixie wrote:
Specifically, I want to know why Comcast makes itself so hard to reach.
I'll bet I could get them to talk to me about this host if it were DDoS'ing
me, or if I aggressively NMAP'd it at 25Mbits/sec for 48 hours straight.
Based on the comments in many forums,
Hmmm...
bash-2.05$ dig www.cpan.org
; DiG 8.3 www.cpan.org
;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
;; got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 4
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 3, ADDITIONAL: 3
;; QUERY SECTION:
;; www.cpan.org, type = A,
Paul,
How about just configuring your BIND to return errors when his queries
against your server? He has got to be using you as either a primary or
secondary name server. That would make everything on that machine suddenly
come to a grinding halt as nothing would resolve anymore.
I used to
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brian Bruns
Sent: September 28, 2003 6:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Paul Vixie
Subject: Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone
from attbi please contact me ...)
How about just
How should an ISP tell the difference between good DNS packets and bad
DNS packets?
the bad ones are the ones people complain about.
You aren't complaining about your dynamic update packets or even all
dynamic updates. You are complaining about someone sending you packets
you don't want.
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Paul Vixie wrote:
I've been thinking how to use ICMP to signal different types of
responses; and even how smart edges on both ends of a communication
could establish and enforce policies. Most of these are non-malicious
communications involving misconfigured systems.
Is there a way to configure bind so that when an **unauthorized** update
comes in it enstates an address of the owner's choice?
--
-=[L]=-
The Oregon route server seems to indicate they are off the air. Not that I
care to look at fee schedules tonight, but the whois server for
in-addr.arpa is toast as a result :-(
---Mike
BGP routing table entry for 192.149.252.0/24, version 1277910
Paths: (57 available, best #48, table
works fine for me.
--
Brian Bruns
The Summit Open Source Development Group
Open Solutions For A Closed World / Anti-Spam Resources
http://www.2mbit.com
ICQ: 8077511
- Original Message -
From: Mike Tancsa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday,
What AS path are you taking to get there ? From the oregon-ix, every peer
listed there (57 of them) shows it flapping to various degrees
BGP routing table entry for 192.149.252.0/24, version 1277910
Paths: (57 available, best #48, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Not advertised to any peer
I am seeing the same. ARIN is completely off the air
box02rsm-en01.twdx.net sh ip bgp 192.149.252.16
% Network not in table
-hc
--
Haesu C.
TowardEX Technologies, Inc.
Consulting, colocation, web hosting, network design and implementation
http://www.towardex.com | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cell:
At 10:07 PM 9/28/2003, you wrote:
I am seeing the same. ARIN is completely off the air
box02rsm-en01.twdx.net sh ip bgp 192.149.252.16
% Network not in table
I see them via a UUNet announcement through Veroxity and Sprint transit,
but I don't see it via any other peer or transit provider. Are
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Robert Boyle wrote:
I see them via a UUNet announcement through Veroxity and Sprint transit,
but I don't see it via any other peer or transit provider. Are they
multi-homed?
I only see them via uunet as well. I noticed earlier that they were
supressed due to dampening
Looks like they are back on the air
route-views-v4.lab.occaid.org sh ip bgp 192.149.252.16
BGP routing table entry for 192.149.252.0/24
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Not advertised to any peer
27552 209 701 7046
65.116.132.129 from 65.116.132.129
the whole end-to-end argument depends on uniform clue distribution
for scale.
...
Getting vendors to supply more appropriate defaults offers better
scaling possibilities. Your complaint might fix one user's computer,
Microsoft updating the default behaivor would fix tens of millions
of
We experienced an unexpected outage of our services
while conducting routine maintenance. You should
have no trouble reaching our services now.
Best Regards,
Richard Jimmerson
Director of Operations
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Haesu wrote:
I am seeing
Is there a way to configure bind so that when an **unauthorized** update
comes in it enstates an address of the owner's choice?
well, i'm thinking of setting up a wildcard A RR pointing at 127.255.255.255.
--
Paul Vixie
Some cable user's machine running default-configured MS apps
is sending Paul dynamic DNS queries that it shouldn't,
because somehow it's decided he's got an interesting destination
(I'm guessing f.root-servers.net ?)
Paul wants the user to get an error popup about it.
Well, default-configured
25 matches
Mail list logo
