According to the notice
"Satellite and other spacecraft operations, power systems, high
frequency communications, and navigation systems may experience
disruptions over this two-week period."
I think you will find that 802.11b and other terrestrial microwave LOS
links don't meet any of those c
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Terry Baranski wrote:
:The "without notice" part is perhaps somewhat unsettling. I can
:appreciate that attempting to explain this type of change to the AOL
:user base would be challenging, but I'd submit that third-party software
:making OS changes like this without the use
my office experienced 802.11b weirdness (sudden bouts of 0% signal for no
apparent reason) earlier this week. i'm fully expecting more tomorrow. :)
> There is a high likelihood that things like 802.11, licensed and
> unlicensed microwave links, and certainly satellite links will sustain
> interfe
I'm surprised that there has been no warning or discussion on NANOG...
There is a high likelihood that things like 802.11, licensed and
unlicensed microwave links, and certainly satellite links will sustain
interference over the next few days. I assume that everyone on the list
is both aware, and
How many other ISPs intend to follow AOL's practice and use their
connection support software to fix the defaults on their customer's
Windows computers?
Thankfully our focus is hosting & Colo, not access, so our pool is
smaller and (theoretically) smarter. However this hasn't stopped us
from doi
> > How many other ISPs intend to follow AOL's practice and use their
> > connection support software to fix the defaults on their customer's
> > Windows computers?
>
> Sounds good to me. The potential for these users
> to be less-than-educated enough about the existance of
> this "feature
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Sean Donelan wrote:
>
>
> Without notice AOL has been modifying the operating system settings of
> users with AOL software installed on Windows computers. Although
> complaints about Windows' Messenger pop-up spam continue to grow, few
This is a nice thing, but I recall so
I fully approve, so long as there's a documented, opt-me-out process for
those that may need that sort of thingbut I think the majority is
pretty well served by this sort of thing. Unlike say changes proposed by
some companies.
I just don't know how far to draw the line, and it needs to be
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 12:13:59AM -0400, Sean Donelan wrote:
> http://www.securityfocus.com/news/7278
>
> How many other ISPs intend to follow AOL's practice and use their
> connection support software to fix the defaults on their customer's
> Windows computers?
Sounds good to me. The
Without notice AOL has been modifying the operating system settings of
users with AOL software installed on Windows computers. Although
complaints about Windows' Messenger pop-up spam continue to grow, few
users bother to turn off the Windows' Messenger service. Starting two
weeks ago AOL used
Your results look a hell of alot more realistic then what Verisign tried to
get people to swallow at SECSAC.
Too bad they won't take it seriously because its 'obviously biased' :-/
--
Brian Bruns
The Summit Open Source Development Group
Open Solutions For A Closed World
my survey is over. see http://sa.vix.com/~vixie/comnetsurv/ for the results.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
This might sound quite funny, but alas here it goes...
I have been trying to contact AS237, and as the registry contains:
OrgName:Merit Network Inc.
OrgID: MICH
ASNumber: 237
ASName: MERIT-AS-14
ASHandle: AS237
Comment:
RegDate:1988-09
Greetings - here's some info about the last meeting, next meeting, and the list.
NANOG 29 - Chicago
2nd joint meeting with ARIN
Host: Server Central Network
Total attendees:
Sorry, I know many are going to think I should go and scan rfc-index.txt
etc., but there is no real better group of people to ask for definitive
pointers.
I am going to be *trying* to work on some (free) BGP code and stuff aftre I
leave my day job (tomorrow!), and I will be spending my spare time
actually no. Joe can probably tell you more but they are peering at both
Equinix-Los Angeles & PAIX-Palo Alto in California in addition to the
carrier hotel on One Wilshire. -ren
At 04:28 AM 10/23/2003 -0700, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
Gut instinct says that One Wilshire is their primary US
PoP/peeri
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Stewart, William C (Bill), RTSLS wrote:
: This was strictly for inbound email to AT&T's corporate mail servers at att.com,
: which were getting pounded with much more spam than usual.
"We all are." I certainly hope the block is temporary so that it is indeed
possible to con
Gut instinct says that One Wilshire is their primary US PoP/peering/transit point:
http://www.onewilshire.com/our_building/connectivity.htm
>> China telecom has some US POPs, so they do have people in the US even.
>
>If I'm not mistaken, I think I even saw an office the other day on Herndon
>Par
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Tom (UnitedLayer) wrote:
>
> On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, John Kristoff wrote:
> > This has been seen elsewhere too and contacting someone at chinanet
> > has been difficult.
>
> I actually found two helpful individuals via posting to this list.
> They both spoke english, and helped
Title: RE: Heads-up: AT&T apparently going to whitelist-only inbound mail
When individual employees of a large corporation speak to the general public, they need to put in a disclaimer. When a large corporation speaks to the general public, the disclaimer is not necessary. Bill was quite righ
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 11:23:08PM -0700, Joe Zhu wrote:
> well...if it's really problem, someone will help. But if it's smart a$$
> comment like this, not sure.
I'm not sure what exactly you took offense too, but if I offended
someone, particularly our international neighbors I apologize. In
my
21 matches
Mail list logo
