The messy cabling gallery has become a victim of its own success
Load on the server (P4/2.0, 512MB) was up to 65, making things nearly
unusable. I took it down for fear that the URL would get spread to
Slashdot or similar places. It'll be back up in a few days, hopefully.
David Lesher
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, John Kinsella wrote:
Always liked the work my fellow coworkers at Globix used to do - I don't
have any shots of SJC or NYC online (too bad - a few projects I went to
alot of trouble on to show the rest how it should be done ;) ), but
here's one of our demo panels from
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Pekka Savola wrote:
Now, we've seen a few pics of good cabling as well.
However, I'm forced to ask which kind of good cabling is possible in
a dynamic environment when you plug in/out, change, etc. the cables.
This seems to invariably lead to total chaos :-).
You
Pekka Savola wrote:
Now, we've seen a few pics of good cabling as well.
However, I'm forced to ask which kind of good cabling is possible in
a dynamic environment when you plug in/out, change, etc. the cables.
This seems to invariably lead to total chaos :-).
Just one opinion.
If you
On 17.12 19:07, Pekka Savola wrote:
How do you do good cabling in dynamic, real environments? :-)
My own 25 years of experience boil down to:
Try to plan for expansion as well as possible when designing,
then periodically start over and completely re-build the messy parts.
How do you do good cabling in dynamic, real environments? :-)
I find that no matter what you do, if there's more than one person touching
the cabling, then it ends up a mess, unless you're very strict about cabling
policy. Everyone has their pet way of running cat5 in a rack, and each one
Anyone have anything positive or negative to say about Broadwing on the
transit side?
Private e-mail only please; i'll summarize to the list if there's interest.
Tim
http://new.onecall.net/timages/dsxcabling.jpg
http://new.onecall.net/timages/cat5patch.jpg
Isn't it amazing how clean cabling in nearly empty collos and mmrs looks?
Alex
How do you do good cabling in dynamic, real environments? :-)
It is not that difficult *if* the money is spent in a short term to make
sure that no ugly and silly stuff is crated in a longer(long) term.
Strategically pre-running certain parts of the facility with cat5/fiber to
minimize the
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 07:07:13PM +0200, Pekka Savola wrote:
How do you do good cabling in dynamic, real environments? :-)
You hide the spiders nest with lots of panduit covers? ;)
Honestly, I think it comes down to two things: Planning before
implementation - you pre-wire your net gear to
Any good software out there for cable documenting and even routing and for
ECO when things are changed?
-Henry
Alex Yuriev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do you do good cabling in dynamic, real environments? :-)It is not that difficult *if* the money is spent in a short term to makesure that no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pekka Savola wrote:
| On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, John Kinsella wrote:
|
|Always liked the work my fellow coworkers at Globix used to do - I don't
|have any shots of SJC or NYC online (too bad - a few projects I went to
|alot of trouble on to show the rest
Oh...
Had to take a potshot, didn't we ?
FWIW, we are near filled now, and
we managed to Keep the Faith...
Alex Yuriev wrote:
http://new.onecall.net/timages/dsxcabling.jpg
http://new.onecall.net/timages/cat5patch.jpg
Isn't it amazing how clean cabling in nearly empty collos and mmrs looks?
the most long-term stable cable dress i see is in cookie-cutter pops,
where the provider cranks them out fully pre-wired and all the same.
you live in a dynamic environment? unplanned change either makes
messes or large amounts of rework. there ain't no magic pill.
randy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Henry Linneweh wrote:
| Any good software out there for cable documenting and even routing and for
| ECO when things are changed?
|
I've looked at ITRACS (www.itracs.com) and Telsoft's stuff
(http://telsoft-solutions.com/cable.html) before.
ITT also
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Kinsella wrote:
| On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 07:07:13PM +0200, Pekka Savola wrote:
|
|How do you do good cabling in dynamic, real environments? :-)
|
|
| You hide the spiders nest with lots of panduit covers? ;)
|
| Honestly, I think it comes down
Can somebody who is responsible on blocking IP's on unknown.level3.net
ports contact me off-list ?
I have a DDOS attack against one of my customers from a customer of
level3.
--jan
--
Jan Czmok, Network Engineering Support, Global Access Telecomm, Inc.
Ph.: +49 69 299896-35 - fax: +49 69
Hi,
I was wondering what the best sources for up to date info on current
packet size distribution on the Internet might be?
i.e. X% of Internet packets are of size Y bytes to Z bytes.
I remember seeing this 2+ years ago but that was many disk
Rob Healey wrote:
I was wondering what the best sources for up to date info on current
packet size distribution on the Internet might be?
Here's a view from our edge:
IP packet size distribution (6491M total packets):
1-32 64 96 128 160 192 224 256 288 320 352 384
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 03:59:28PM -0500, Jeff Kell wrote:
Rob Healey wrote:
I was wondering what the best sources for up to date info on current
packet size distribution on the Internet might be?
Here's a view from our edge:
IP packet size distribution (6491M total
The National Communications System issued a Request for Information
(RFI) concerning Internet Priority Services for National Security and
Emergency Preparedness (NS/EP) communications. The RFI announcement
appears on the Federal Business Opportunities website at the url:
At 04:08 PM 12/17/2003, Jared wrote:
Close to what we see at one location:
Router#sh ip ca flow
IP packet size distribution (17137M total packets):
1-32 64 96 128 160 192 224 256 288 320 352 384 416 448 480
.004 .621 .068 .029 .013 .007 .005 .006 .003 .005 .006 .006
IP packet size distribution (17137M total packets):
1-32 64 96 128 160 192 224 256 288 320 352 384 416 448 480
.004 .621 .068 .029 .013 .007 .005 .006 .003 .005 .006 .006 .006 .004 .004
512 544 576 1024 1536 2048 2560 3072 3584 4096 4608
.004 .003 .016 .018
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Jeff Kell wrote:
Rob Healey wrote:
I was wondering what the best sources for up to date info on current
packet size distribution on the Internet might be?
Here's a view from our edge:
IP packet size distribution (6491M total packets):
1-32 64
24 matches
Mail list logo
