I can imagine what a rack full of 1U's from varying vendors
with different cable management systems would be like.
It can be tricky. Single vendor helps, even simpler if it's all Sun -
http://www.bogons.net/pics/bogons_20021205b.jpg
http://www.bogons.net/pics/bogons_20031005a.jpg
Sun Netras
This report has been generated at Fri Mar 19 21:45:13 2004 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of an AS4637 (Reach) router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/as4637 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table
Last June I promised here that AS13345 was working on the issues
preventing aggregation internally
Top 20 Net Decreased Routes per Originating AS
Prefixes Change ASnum AS Description
-36 91-55 AS13345 RKCI Rockynet.com, Inc
We're not done
Anyone from the DOI's Educational Native American Network lurking here
please contact me off-list.
On Mar 19, 2004, at 9:00 AM, Mike Lewinski wrote:
Last June I promised here that AS13345 was working on the issues
preventing aggregation internally
Top 20 Net Decreased Routes per Originating AS
Prefixes Change ASnum AS Description
-36 91-55
Can somebody explain to me why I keep getting e-mails with no content that are setting
off my virus scanners via NANOG list?
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Gregory Taylor writes:
Can somebody explain to me why I keep getting e-mails with no content that are
setting off my virus scanners via NANOG list?
Probably because there's a worm that's sending the messages -- messages
that purport to be from legitimate NANOG
i tried posting to cisco-nsp and got no replies so i figured i'd try here as well..
please forgive me if i am posting out of order
does anyone have experience with cisco qos aggregate rate-limiting on a 6500 with
mscf/pfc's... if so, please reply off list for particular questions...
Steve Bellovin writes:
Gregory Taylor writes:
Can somebody explain to me why I keep getting e-mails with no content that are
setting off my virus scanners via NANOG list?
Probably because there's a worm that's sending the messages -- messages
that purport to be from legitimate NANOG posters.
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 02:03:06PM -0800, George William Herbert wrote:
This is why I use nmh as my mail user agent.
But it doesn't protect anyone else out there
from viruses impersonating me in this manner.
Or impersonating you, or anyone else...
These spoofed virii/worm/whatnot
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Kelly Setzer wrote:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 09:07:31AM -0500, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul Vixie writes:
I agree, lack of interactive access to a system prior to a functional OS
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Krzysztof Adamski wrote:
The pc-weasel does not work in all motherboards also.
It does require a 5volt 32bit pci slot. and a ps/2 keyboard port, and it
won't work with an ami-winbios among other things...
In many respects the weasel is begining to show it's age, but
Joel Jaeggli wrote:
The killer feature (that I'm willing to pay monay for for one of these
products) is having a unit that can remotely power-cycle the box when the
os is totally hung. We used to do this (and still do), with serially
Recent Compaq systems with integrated remote ILO provide a
14 matches
Mail list logo
