OK. Make it 100, or make it 20 by default, user can ask for 100. Or
anything else like that. The *POINT* was that too often, a compromised
end-user machine can send *THOUSANDS* of messages. Not tens. Not
hundreds. Thousands.
Here's another way to structure this sort of policy using
a soft
On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 13:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If any of your user connections is the origin of more than
5 SMTP sessions in a single day, send an email to the
registered contact at that site with a little statistical
summary of the activity. No blocking of sessions, just a
note
Erik Haagsman wrote:
Spammers can only work when making enormous amounts of connections
each hour, so limiting a normal user to 10 connections per hour with
some extra slack after two or three connectionless hours, with an hour
blocking penalty if the user goes over shouldn't pose a problem
At 16:56 -0400 (GMT) 6/4/04, Padliya, Deepak wrote:
Greetings !
On March 8th, 2004, SAVVIS Communications Corporation (NASDAQ:
SVVS), a leading global managed services provider, secured all
regulatory approvals and closed its acquisition of the assets of
Cable Wireless... We expect the
On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 14:25, Dave Howe wrote:
I think 10 is a bit low.
It is, although it's more of an example value than a practical one.
You'd have to get some statistics on average e-mail use from your mail
servers and tune the value accordingly.
I am not really an abnormal email user -
Hi,
I know this is somewhat off topic, but I am hoping someone here has previously dealt
with this problem and has an answer.
For some reason, the access telephone number for our internal use only dial-up modem
pool -- which also happens to connect to our fax server -- has gotten on several
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
Hi,
I know this is somewhat off topic, but I am hoping someone here has previously dealt
with this problem and has an answer.
For some reason, the access telephone number for our internal use only dial-up
modem pool --
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 10:16:09AM -0400, David Lesher wrote:
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
Hi,
I know this is somewhat off topic, but I am hoping someone here has previously
dealt with this problem and has an answer.
For some reason, the
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004, Jon R. Kibler wrote:
fax telephone number. We have captured several dozen faxes sent through
that number over the past few days, and they all have 'enter your number
here to delete' toll free numbers on them and we would like to find out
the telco that owns those blocks of
See www.junkfax.org
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb
10 matches
Mail list logo
