- Original Message -
From: "Mark Kent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 12:39 PM
Subject: Re: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul
>
> Order the T1 (ESF, B8ZS). As you order the circuit specify where you
> want it to end up ("server room, 2nd floor") and t
Important enough to not be off-topic.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/07/21/cyber.theft/index.html
- ferg
--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> SmartJack with demarcation point in the office (or
>> same floor) instead of the building entrance point
I can't emphasize enough the importance of this, read ahead.
> Mark Kent wrote:
> You are not likely going to be able to control that,
> it depends on how the install tech's day is going.
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 04:03:18PM -0400, Brandon Pinsky wrote:
> I just installed a Quickbridge 60 recently. It's pretty nice. The
> throughput is good over a .75 mile link. I was able to successfully
> push ~20Mbps with an iperf test. Installation was easy relative to
> some of the othe
Thanks for the info! That's exactly what I need.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Scott Blomquist
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 4:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Campus size Wireless LAN
> On Jul 21, 2004, at 2:01 PM, Eric
I would watch out on the ADSL lines; most carriers I have dealt
with in the past on these types of circuits fall under the residential
category and there for do not have the same type of SLA's (24x7 support
or response window) that say an SDSL business account would. Depending
on the requ
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Brown" >
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 8:01 AM
Subject: Campus size Wireless LAN
> Anyone have experience with Proxim's tsunami quickbridge for wireless
> connectivity between buildings at line of site distances under 1 mile?
> It's cheaper than Cisco a
Brandon Pinsky wrote:
I just installed a Quickbridge 60 recently. It's pretty nice. The
throughput is good over a .75 mile link. I was able to successfully
push ~20Mbps with an iperf test. Installation was easy relative to
some of the other equipment we have installed. The feed line is UT
Actually, it has little to do with the techs day.
It's all provisioning. At the local mom and pop
CLEC, it actually may be the techs day. YMMV. :)
DSX indicates a cross connect in the loop.
A cross connect is a dumb mechanical device that does nothing
except put access points in the "long haul"
On Jul 21, 2004, at 2:01 PM, Eric Brown wrote:
Anyone have experience with Proxim's tsunami quickbridge for wireless
connectivity between buildings at line of site distances under 1 mile?
It's cheaper than Cisco and looks good on paper. Looking for the good
bad and ugly. Thanks in advance!
-Eri
We would like to make a system setup capable to automatically test several
points of our network (different BRAS, different DNS Servers, etc), mainly
using PPPoE
Does anyone have or heard about this kind of "DSL simulator"?
-Hamilton
DDD para todo o Brasil
e DDI para o mundo inteir
I just installed a Quickbridge 60 recently. It's pretty nice. The
throughput is good over a .75 mile link. I was able to successfully
push ~20Mbps with an iperf test. Installation was easy relative to
some of the other equipment we have installed. The feed line is UTP
and the radio gets
Yes, this is built around category 3 wiring, not 5. The specs are a
little more forgiving. Just grab any 'ole ethernet patch cord and hook
it up. Works flawlessly. Unless you're running between DSX pannels or
into another MUX, you never need to roll pairs on a T1 installation so
just wire straight
We're using a Western Mutiplex Tsunami 100 5.3 -5.8 Ghz over a 4 mile
shot and it has worked flawlessly except for a couple realy bad rain storms
and 1 lightnening strike which whipped out a power supply that was easily
replaced at radio shack.
Western Multiplex,
Model# Tsunami 100
27720-
Not a direct answer but I can highly recommend Airaya http://www.airaya.com
I have a number of their bridges operating including one of six miles.
Roy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Eric Brown
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 11:02 AM
To:
Its easier to follow the money. DDOS gang arrested in Russia.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/3914363.stm
The National High-Tech Crime Unit, which led the investigation, tracked
down the racketeers by tracing money transfers between the three men and
ten gang members who had been arrested i
Anyone have experience with Proxim's tsunami quickbridge for wireless
connectivity between buildings at line of site distances under 1 mile?
It's cheaper than Cisco and looks good on paper. Looking for the good
bad and ugly. Thanks in advance!
-Eric
>> I don't think standard ethernet pinouts are correct. You want a cable
>> with pins 1&2 on one twisted pair and 4&5 on another (7&8 for DDS 56K).
Correct has nothing to do with it.
Any straight-through cable will work just fine. It's just from the
jack to the equipment... and it's already be
Another drawback is that, by their nature, ADSL circuits have a higher
latency than standard T1 service. So if this is something thats really
important, a "propper" T1 might be a better option.
Then there's that little problem of maintaining routing over 8
parallel links, etc.
On Wed, Jul 21, 20
Jon R. Kibler wrote:
Andre:
If your distance for the short-haul is less than 10 miles or so
> (line-of-sight), I would go wireless. Reasons:
a) you can get 10-30MBps on wireless vs. 1.4Mbps for T1.
b) if you already have an antenna or other high-point, you can
> own the wireless network for a
Something to be careful on with ADSL is repair times. For example, with
Qwest there is a 4 hour guarenteed dispatch (24x7x365) on T1 circuits, and a
23 business hour dispatch on ADSL. YMMV with other telcos.
---
Adam Debus
Network Engineer, ReachONE Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Messa
One word of caution on that - we had a customer who got 4 separate
1M/1.5M ADSL circuits - all to the same DSLAM. Ended up that the telco
had only provisioned that DSLAM with a single T1, and was apparently
unable to upgrade that, negating any advantage to the multiple DSL's.
It was a remote DSLAM
Yep, Asterisk and a MeetMe room. Gotta warn you though, you
might like it so much you replace your pbx.
-ejay
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
> Behalf Of Adam 'Starblazer' Romberg
> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 1:10 AM
> To: Robert A. Hayd
Andre:
If your distance for the short-haul is less than 10 miles or so (line-of-sight), I
would go wireless. Reasons:
a) you can get 10-30MBps on wireless vs. 1.4Mbps for T1.
b) if you already have an antenna or other high-point, you can own the wireless
network for about what the Telco wo
>> o SmartJack with demarcation point in the office (or same floor) instead
>>of the building entrance point
You are not likely going to be able to control that,
it depends on how the install tech's day is going.
Strictly speaking, I believe they are supposed to put
it at the MPOE.
>> If I
Robert Boyle wrote:
Does anyone else have more/better info?
I've found this to be useful:
http://www.dcbnet.com/notes/9611t1.html
--
Gabriel Cain www.dialupusa.net
Senior Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP fingerprint: C0B4 C6B
Ok, thanks for all the responses so far!
To summarize what I've gathered from the answers and reading through the
pointed out websites. For ordering T1 leased-line services I want the
following:
o Router port with integrated CSU/DSU (instead of going T1->X.21->Router)
[this was clear to me fr
Robert Boyle wrote:
At 08:25 AM 7/21/2004, you wrote:
o What is "Wet T1 Capable"? What is it used for and who needs this?
This is one of the "features" of the new WIC-1DSU-T1-V2. It seems that
some DSUs can be powered by the telco remotely. In 15 years of working
in communications, I've never se
Robert Boyle wrote:
You can travel up to 655 ft. with a T1 cable from the NTU which the
phone company will drop at your site. According to the letter of the
specs, you are supposed to use "T1 cable" two 22AWG pairs individually
shielded to prevent cross-talk. In practice, we have extended DMarcs
This is a pretty good site that will answer most of your questions.
http://www.dcbnet.com/notes/9611t1.html
On 7/21/04 7:25 AM, "Andre Oppermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm having a few questions about T1 line support in the US because I have to
> procure
> some Router/Network hardw
At 08:25 AM 7/21/2004, you wrote:
Normally in Europe when you order an E1 (G.703) connection the Telco
delivers a
NTU (Network termination Unit) which normally is a (S)HDSL modem
converting from
two-wire DSL to four-wire E1 electrical. The cable between the NTU and
the Router
is normally very s
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> I'm having a few questions about T1 line support in the US because I have to procure
> some Router/Network hardware for US branches of a company (I am from Europe).
>
> Normally in Europe when you order an E1 (G.703) connection the Telco delivers a
>
I'm having a few questions about T1 line support in the US because I have to
procure
some Router/Network hardware for US branches of a company (I am from Europe).
Normally in Europe when you order an E1 (G.703) connection the Telco delivers a
NTU (Network termination Unit) which normally is a (S)H
Richard J. Sears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are looking into the possibility of implementing our own RWhois
> server as opposed to continuing to provide information via SWIP. I
> am looking for any advice as to what people are currently running
> for their whois/rwhois server.
When I started
34 matches
Mail list logo
