Good Afternoon!
I'd like to apologize for the inconsiderate statement I made this morning.
It was unecessary and uncalled for. I should've said it like Eric
Gauthier and Petri Helenius did. Nicely.
I deal with these things everyday on my network and was just shocked that
any part of a networ
>-Original Message-
>From: Curtis Maurand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 10:25 PM
>To: 'J Sparacio'
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: PPPoE questions
>
>
>
>Been there, done that.
>
>--
>Curtis Maurand
>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://www.maurand.com
>
>
>On
Been there, done that.
--
Curtis Maurand
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.maurand.com
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, J Sparacio wrote:
There's a thing called Google.com. If you put a string in the search
field, and hit search...it will return lots of websites that will
probably have all the information
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Jeff Shultz wrote:
** Reply to message from "Stephen J. Wilcox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
on Wed, 28 Jul 2004 00:50:19 +0100 (BST)
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Richard Welty wrote:
you can tell someone has become an intermediate driver because
they start regularly trashing their brakes.
you
Anyone know where I can go to ask a couple questions regarding PPPoE. I
need to talk to someone more knowlegeable about it than I.
Curtis
--
Curtis Maurand
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.maurand.com
Sean Donelan wrote:
As NANOG has experienced during the last several meetings, in any network
used by a large number of people, there will be a certain percentage of
people which bring infected computers into the network.
And it would be stupid not to be prepared for it. For wired networks,
it'
Laris Benkis - good guy, learnt a lot from him in the past
Paul Ryan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard J. Sears
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 4:19 PM
To: Nanog
Subject: Loss of Telnet Capability - RESOLVED
Thanks to everyon
We had 6509 which failed, because backplain failed (it can not happen -:)
but it happen) - iof course, no any 'dual CPU dual power' could prevent
it... Image broken line card - it can crash whole box no matter how much
'dual' things you have. The same with software error (I crashed one of 6509
jus
Maybe it is something to do with the following Cisco Field Notice:
Message Type : Field Notice
Title: Cisco Field Notice: Cat6xxx Switches And 76xx Series Routers Running A Sup2
With CatOS Versions 7.6(1)
Through 7.6(4) May Hang After Running For A Period Of Time
URL:
http:/
> A buncha technically clueless newsgeeks brought infected micro$loth
> computers into a convention? Shocking! What's this world coming to???
> Sounds like Verizon hired low-end netgeeks if they had to bring the
> network down to find these infected computers.
Maybe they could have benifited fr
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. wrote:
: > : As NANOG has experienced during the last several meetings, in any network
: > : used by a large number of people, there will be a certain percentage of
: > : people which bring infected computers into the network.
: > : evening the mai
Scott Weeks wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, Sean Donelan wrote:
: As NANOG has experienced during the last several meetings, in any network
: used by a large number of people, there will be a certain percentage of
: people which bring infected computers into the network.
:
: http://www.nytimes.com/2004
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, Sean Donelan wrote:
: As NANOG has experienced during the last several meetings, in any network
: used by a large number of people, there will be a certain percentage of
: people which bring infected computers into the network.
:
: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/29/technology
Tracey Webb wrote:
I am attempting to bridge multiple ATM vc's on a single port OC12c in my
Cisco 12008. The vc's are coming from VTC video equipment. Each vc is a
different channel. I need to terminate it and pass over the IP's to my
gigE port. Any suggestions.
Maybe this works...
interface ATM6/
Ben Buxton wrote:
On a related note - is it possible to get a 650x switch to perform flow
based etherchannel load balancing, WITHOUT the switch actually routing
(ie performing purely swithcing functions)??
I believe you then have to play around with the frame distribution
settings in the Cat to ma
I am attempting to bridge multiple ATM vc's on a single port OC12c in my
Cisco 12008. The vc's are coming from VTC video equipment. Each vc is a
different channel. I need to terminate it and pass over the IP's to my
gigE port. Any suggestions.
Tracey Webb
Network Operations
Cameron Communications
Robert Blayzor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered the following thing:
>
> >of the links to be used.
> >
> >Use method 2 especially if you mean this to be a L3 handoff to the
> >customer.
>
> What Mike states is correct about the layer2 vs layer3 load balancing:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer
Jim Devane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered the following thing:
>
> I have been pretty happy with the MRV box. It is passive and it not
> manageable like an ONS etc. It has been rock solid for some time.
>
> www.mrv.com
>
> Specifically, we are using the CWDM EM316PAMULC. The only bad thing I wou
As NANOG has experienced during the last several meetings, in any network
used by a large number of people, there will be a certain percentage of
people which bring infected computers into the network.
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/29/technology/circuits/29bost.html?pagewanted=3
Wiring a Conven
19 matches
Mail list logo
