Fwd: Re: Are AOL's MXs mass rejecting anyone else's emails?

2004-08-11 Thread Andrew Paprocki
This message was sent to me offline after my post to the list. This apparen tly solved our problems. Just sending back to the list so anyone else searc hing for this issue can find an answer. Thanks NANOG! -Andrew > - Begin Forwarded Message - > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > From: [EM

Re: That MIT paper

2004-08-11 Thread William Allen Simpson
Paul Vixie wrote: > > (what if a general decline in TTL's resulted from publication of That > MIT Paper?) > It's an academic paper. The best antedote would be to publish a nicely researched reply paper. Meanwhile, I'm probably one of those guilty of too large a reduction of TTLs. I remember

Re: That MIT paper

2004-08-11 Thread Randy Bush
there are many sites and isps like mit and kaist. there are few root servers. while i care about the root servers, i presume that they are run by competent folk and certainly they are measured to death (which is rather boring from the pov of most of us). i care about isp and user site measureme

Re: That MIT paper

2004-08-11 Thread David G. Andersen
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 04:49:18PM +, Paul Vixie scribed: > what i meant by "act globally, think locally" in connection with That > MIT Paper is that the caching effects seen at mit are at best > representative of that part of mit's campus for that week, and that Totally agreed. The paper

RE: Legal intercept - 3550

2004-08-11 Thread Burton, Chris
You could setup a Linux/Solaris (or other) device (It would need to be GigE capable) and span all of the data to that port and then use either iptables/ipchains to log the data and drop what don't need or use ethereal/tcpdump to capture the data using filters to weed out the information yo

Datacenter

2004-08-11 Thread Daniel Corbe
Hello, My company is looking to build a new Datacenter in the Ft. Lauderdale area of florida. This is my first such experience building one from scratch. Does anyone have or know of an available design guide? What kind of options are available for backup power? (IE low or midrange Diesel gen

verizon postmaster contact?

2004-08-11 Thread Brian Russo
Can someone with verizon mail/postmaster group get in touch with me. thanks, - bri -- Recursivity. Call back if it happens again.

Re: Testing procedures for new network implementation?

2004-08-11 Thread Will Hargrave
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 10:20:44AM -0400, Wayne Chow wrote: > We are in the process of planning for the upgrade of a 3Com network. > The new infrastructure will be comprised of 3Com 4950s with XRN and a dozen > stacks of 4400s. > What are the best practices of testing the new implementation? Any

Re: Legal intercept - 3550

2004-08-11 Thread Stefan Baltus
Thanks for all the replies. The best solution was by Boyan Krosnov who suggested the following: Configure the GE port where the traffic comes in from the fiber tap in a separate new vlan A, access mode. Configure fastethernet X to be in access mode for vlan A. Configure a static mac entry for vla

Re: Are AOL's MXs mass rejecting anyone else's emails?

2004-08-11 Thread rwcrowe
Just a suggestion, but make sure that your mail servers have the correct reverse DNS. AOL has been rejecting mail for any mail servers that have incorrect or no reverse DNS entries. --Rob Crowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Original message -- > > We're currently getting this from A

Verizon Data (T1) Rep?

2004-08-11 Thread Jonathan M. Slivko
Hello, Can a Verizon Data (T1) Rep. please call/contact me off list ASAP? Thanks! -- Jonathan -- Jonathan M. Slivko Invisible Hand Networks, Inc. 670 Broadway, Suite 302 New York, NY 10012 Phone: (212) 226-1422 x601 Fax: (212) 202-7640 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Are AOL's MXs mass rejecting anyone else's emails?

2004-08-11 Thread Andrew Paprocki
We're currently getting this from AOL MX servers: 64.12.138.57 failed after I sent the message. Remote host said: 554-: (RLY:FA) http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/554r lyfa.html 554 TRANSACTION FAILED Yet, after viewing their alleged reason for rejecting the mail, we can find nothing

Re: Legal intercept - 3550

2004-08-11 Thread Joe Abley
On 11 Aug 2004, at 10:48, Ricardo "Rick" Gonzalez wrote: I think you're confusing your OSI layers here, routers route and switches switch. Oh, those were the days.

Re: Legal intercept - 3550

2004-08-11 Thread Scott Stursa
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Stefan Baltus wrote: > The catalyst 3350 is receiving the traffic from router to switch > and vice versa. Can we assume the 3550 port attached to the tap is GE? > Now, we'd like to filter all but certain IP's on the > 3350 and switch this traffic to a FE port on that same 3

Re: Legal intercept - 3550

2004-08-11 Thread Owen DeLong
You might be able to do what yo want by hard-coding the CAM entries in the catalyst so that it forwards the MAC addresses you're concerned about to the port in question, but, that may or may not achieve what you want, depending on the makeup of the MAC addresses in the 300mbps traffic and whether

Re: That MIT paper

2004-08-11 Thread Paul Vixie
what i meant by "act globally, think locally" in connection with That MIT Paper is that the caching effects seen at mit are at best representative of that part of mit's campus for that week, and that even a variance of 1% in caching effectiveness at MIT that's due to generally high or low TTL's (o

Floorspace / Power Possibilities - location independant

2004-08-11 Thread Micah McNelly
Guys/Gals, I'm currently digging for cheap floorspace / power / network with no specific geographical region in mind. If you know of any well managed facilities with very low per square foot cost and cheap power (no hamsters please) please respond to me offlist. Should be carrier neutral but

Re: Testing procedures for new network implementation?

2004-08-11 Thread Ricardo \"Rick\" Gonzalez
No Rafi, I'm not "confused", I replied recounting what my organization deployed as a replacement for the hardware which Wayne is currently working on. Please refrain from further ad-hominem personal attacks in violation of this forum's charter. Just because different list participants have diffe

Re: Testing procedures for new network implementation?

2004-08-11 Thread Rafi Sadowsky
Hi Rick You seem slightly confused: All the URLs you sent are for 10/100 ethernet switches/hubs (I inserted the relevant title below each url ) -- Rafi ## On 2004-08-11 10:39 -0400 Ricardo "Rick" Gonzalez typed: R"G> R"G> Wayne, R"G> R"G> My organization has recently switched fr

Re: Legal intercept - 3550

2004-08-11 Thread Ricardo \"Rick\" Gonzalez
Stefan, I think you're confusing your OSI layers here, routers route and switches switch. If you're spanning 300 megabits per second, what you'll need is a gigabit card for the span port on the 3550 (or directly connected to the passive tap you've installed). ---Rico On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 16:37:

Re: Testing procedures for new network implementation?

2004-08-11 Thread Ricardo \"Rick\" Gonzalez
Wayne, My organization has recently switched from a similar infrastructure to the following: Core: http://www.svec.com/PRODUCTS/fd800ds/FD800DS2.htm Distribution layer: http://www.svec.com/Products/FD521EDS.HTM Wire closet: http://www.svec.com/Products/fd510eds.htm We have seen a noticeable inc

Legal intercept - 3550

2004-08-11 Thread Stefan Baltus
Hi, We have a situation where we need to intercept certain IP traffic that is somewhere within a link of 300Mbit/s of traffic (GigabitEthernet). The setup that we built is as follows: router ^ | GE | fiber tap ---> cisco catalyst 3550 | | GE v switch The catalyst 3350 is rece

Testing procedures for new network implementation?

2004-08-11 Thread Wayne Chow
Hi All   We are in the process of planning for the upgrade of a 3Com network.   The new infrastructure will be comprised of 3Com 4950s with XRN and a dozen stacks of 4400s.   What are the best practices of testing the new implementation?  Any advices or suggestions would be greatly apprec