I like T-Mobile here in Portland, Oregon. Got a Sidekick/Hiptop.
It does web, email, phone, notes, AIM (who cares), calendar,
and the new one out later this month will have a built-in camera.
The little keypad is nicer than the Blackberry.
It was an extra $10 for the Terminal app, which runs
On 3-sep-04, at 3:04, Joe Rhett wrote:
Anyway, I spent nearly a month in
Spain this spring and my cell phone was my only contact, for both
voice and
many long hours of GPRS internet access, and the bill was only $890 or
something similar.
Just wondering: what do you guys pay per minute when
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 07:48:00PM -0700, Joe Rhett wrote:
vijay gill wrote:
Sorry, again YMMV but I had no trouble with this in either Taiwan or
Singapore, when I was responsible for support in those countries, Japan and
Korea combined. I never saw a problem calling between any of those.
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 08:31:36 +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
Just wondering: what do you guys pay per minute when roaming on GSM
networks abroad? For me it's around 1 euro ($1 excluding sales tax) to
call within the country itself or back home and about half that for
receiving calls in most
You can get most of these phones unlocked from the sim lock
and then britishflog/british it on ebay - goes to the time
and effort costs of the aggrevation of dealing with mobile
operators.
Regards,
Neil.
Now that ATT has followed T-Mobile's example by screwing the
pooch on my cell phone
Michel Py wrote:
In other words: as of today a large part of the bandwidth is allocated
to building everyone's collection of files. This might gradually
change to become bandwidth being used only for incremental updates as
huge local file libraries become common place.
But this possible assumes
This report has been generated at Fri Sep 3 21:42:39 2004 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of an AS4637 (Reach) router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/as4637 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Fred Baker wrote:
At 06:04 PM 09/02/04 -0700, Joe Rhett wrote:
Also note due to fraud mitigation, most phones only allow you to call
within the country you are in or back to the home country, all the while
charging you an exhorbitant price.
Um, sorry but I've never seen
t-mobile usa has significant holes in thier roaming agreements as far as
I'm concerned...
Here in Austin, 3 years ago voicestream sold most of their GSM towers to
ATT, and then sold their out-of-luck customers to tmoble.
tmoble still drops every call on IH-35 by Capitol Plaza Mall.
-bryan
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/09/03/0534206
6.63 Gbps
The article ended with hardware specs 'S2io's Xframe 10 GbE server
adapter, Cisco 7600 Series Routers, Newisys 4300 servers using AMD
Opteron processors, Itanium servers and the 64-bit version of Windows
Server 2003.'
Is there a
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Deepak Jain wrote:
Is there a 10GE OSM for the 7600s?
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps4835/ps5136/index.html
But if there is no other traffic, why would you need deep packet buffers
to beat records? (It doesn't say if this was on a production network with
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps4835/ps5136/index.html
But if there is no other traffic, why would you need deep packet buffers
to beat records? (It doesn't say if this was on a production network with
other traffic or not, so I don't know)
I wouldn't suspect its on a
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Rodney Joffe wrote:
On Sep 2, 2004, at 2:58 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
If you don't implement ripe-229, why not?
because the golden address space stuff is stupid
OK. I'll bite...
Given Network A, which has golden network content behind it as described by
the RIPE
At 10:21 AM 9/3/2004, Deepak Jain wrote:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps4835/ps5136/index.html
But if there is no other traffic, why would you need deep packet buffers to beat
records? (It doesn't say if this was on a production network with other traffic or
not, so I don't
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 07:07:42PM +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
But if there is no other traffic, why would you need deep packet buffers
to beat records? (It doesn't say if this was on a production network with
other traffic or not, so I don't know)
Yes, it was:
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 04 Sep, 2004
You can get most of these phones unlocked from the sim lock
and then britishflog/british it on ebay - goes to the time
and effort costs of the aggrevation of dealing with mobile
operators.
i plan to send the shattered remains of that phone back to ATT
in case they think that my small
I'm looking for a contact in Level 3's Global Network Security
Operations team. If anyone can ping me offline with information, I'd be
grateful.
---
James Baldwin
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Bill Owens wrote:
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 07:07:42PM +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
But if there is no other traffic, why would you need deep packet buffers
to beat records? (It doesn't say if this was on a production network with
other traffic or not, so I don't
Peter Galbavy wrote:
But this possible assumes that production of new media will either
slow or stay at a constant rate. The never-yet-realised side effect of
all this distribution capacity is that possible many more artists will
have access to the listeners / viewers and in more narrow niches
On Sep 3, 2004, at 10:46 AM, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
Given Network A, which has golden network content behind it as
described by
the RIPE paper (root and tld data), if the network has some
combination of
events that result in all of their announcements to you being
dampened by you,
your users
On 3 Sep 2004, at 14:16, James Baldwin wrote:
I'm looking for a contact in Level 3's Global Network Security
Operations team. If anyone can ping me offline with information, I'd
be grateful.
Thanks to everyone who responded. I've gotten in touch with the correct
person on their security team.
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Rodney Joffe wrote:
You are absolutely right in suggesting that .foo has to get its act
together. You may even tell your users that. But you'll be telling
every single one of them, because every single one of them is going to
attempt to resolve .foo domain names during
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Lucy E. Lynch wrote:
digging around here will answer some of your load questions:
With the background noise being approx half a gigabit/s and the PC
seeminly having a theoretical limit of 7.5 gigabit/s (according to the
article), buffering shouldn't have happened during
besides which, i hated the phone. i couldn't get it out of my
pocket without hitting the voice-call button. the asynchronous
nature of the java-based UI meant that the softkeys often changed
what they meant while i was trying to press one. what a total
piece of garbage.
CURIOSITY So
At 02:51 AM 4/09/2004, Deepak Jain wrote:
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/09/03/0534206
6.63 Gbps
The article ended with hardware specs 'S2io's Xframe 10 GbE server
adapter, Cisco 7600 Series Routers, Newisys 4300 servers using AMD Opteron
processors, Itanium servers and the 64-bit version
Hi Steve,
Steve Gibbard wrote:
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Rodney Joffe wrote:
snip
So, it seems to me that there are three questions here:
What is critical infrastructure? DNS for which domains? What about other
services? Google? Hotmail or Yahoo? The answer to this presumably
varies considerably
27 matches
Mail list logo
