Tulip Rasputin wrote:
That's why i explicitly asked for some social/political/etc.
reasons where an ISP may not want his traffic to traverse some
particular AS number(s). Something which is beyond BGP to
determine as of now ! :-)
FWIW, this is exactly how I understood the question. It's all
I've been using Gmail and thought you might like to try it out. Here's
an invitation to create an account.
---
Ricardo Rick Gonzalez has invited you to open a free Gmail account.
The invitation
will expire in three weeks and
[Disclaimer: I do not intend to aim at Savvis in particular.
It just happens that they make the news today. For all
practical purposes, s/Savvis/your_favorite_operator]
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/3634572.stm:
Mr McCormick promised that within the next 10 days all
spammers will be
On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 01:48, Jeff Kell wrote:
I suspect but cannot prove
that the packets are being spoofed as we are dropping (not resetting)
the probes, yet they continue. There are repeated probes from the same
IP address for about 15-20 minutes or more, then it moves along, but the
[ Two replies in one. Last point has operational content. ]
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 01:52:59PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see that 56trf5.com is a real domain. Does this mean that
the domain name registries and DNS are now being polluted
with piles of garbage entries in the same way
At 12:12 PM -0700 9/8/04, Fred Baker wrote:
At 04:29 PM 09/08/04 +, Paul Vixie wrote:
i guess this is progress. the press keeps bleating about stopping
spam from being received -- perhaps if they start paying attention
to how it gets sent and how many supposedly-legitimate businesses
At 11:04 AM +0530 9/9/04, Tulip Rasputin wrote:
Hi Chris,
Or, you just don't want to send traffic through Bill Manning's ASN because
you dislike his hawiian T-Shirt Policy? There are probably a few hundred
reasosn why you'd avoid an ASN... In general though I'd think that like
Michel said: It's a
update SAN FRANCISCO--The Internet needs to be upgraded with a new layer
of abilities that will deal with imminent problems of capacity, security
and reliability, Intel Chief Technology Officer Pat Gelsinger said
Thursday.
Gelsinger pointed to PlanetLab, an experimental network that sits on top
Gelsinger pointed to PlanetLab, an experimental network that sits on top
of the Internet, as a step in the right direction.
ROFL!
[ and i use planetlab ]
randy
Paul Vixie wrote:
update SAN FRANCISCO--The Internet needs to be upgraded with a new layer
of abilities that will deal with imminent problems of capacity, security
and reliability, Intel Chief Technology Officer Pat Gelsinger said
Thursday.
There is confusion in the air about the roles of hosts
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Paul Vixie wrote:
Adaptability, capacity, security. Wait, isn't that what ipv6 was
supposed to do?
-Dan
update SAN FRANCISCO--The Internet needs to be upgraded with a new layer
of abilities that will deal with imminent problems of capacity, security
and reliability, Intel
Layer 8.
- ferg
-- Paul Vixie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
update SAN FRANCISCO--The Internet needs to be upgraded with a new layer
of abilities that will deal with imminent problems of capacity, security
and reliability, Intel Chief Technology Officer Pat Gelsinger said
Thursday.
Gelsinger
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Paul Vixie wrote:
update SAN FRANCISCO--The Internet needs to be upgraded with a new layer
of abilities that will deal with imminent problems of capacity, security
and reliability, Intel Chief Technology Officer Pat Gelsinger said
Thursday.
Gelsinger pointed to PlanetLab, an
On 9/9/04 4:21 PM, Petri Helenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Vixie wrote:
update SAN FRANCISCO--The Internet needs to be upgraded with a new layer
of abilities that will deal with imminent problems of capacity, security
and reliability, Intel Chief Technology Officer Pat Gelsinger
Which is ironic given that many visible trends (optical cores, mpls, l2 ip
dslams) point to dumber network devices not smarter ones. maybe they're in
the business of selling microprocessors?
so we can have a marketing war between those who would save the net
using micro network processors,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings,
This is to inform you that the IANA has allocated the following
eight (8) IPv6 /23 blocks to the RIPE NCC:
2001:5000::/23RIPE NCC
2001:5200::/23RIPE NCC
2001:5400::/23RIPE NCC
2001:5600::/23RIPE NCC
2001:5800::/23
Yeah, great, lots of backbone, but get me fiber to my house, maybe I'll be
excited..
Nice marketing, but, um, still only as good as its weakest link..
HDTV over IP bwhaaa haaa hong long did it take to get VOIP to work?? 10
years? A bit of forshadowing I'd say..
-Original Message-
From:
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Brance Amussen :)_S wrote:
Yeah, great, lots of backbone, but get me fiber to my house, maybe I'll be
excited..
Nice marketing, but, um, still only as good as its weakest link..
HDTV over IP bwhaaa haaa hong long did it take to get VOIP to work?? 10
years? A bit of
Indeed.
So would this be...IP over IP?
And tunnels in tunnels in tunnels...
I see some deep recursion fun here. (Now...to keep the
underlying carrier networks up. Perhaps we need an
Undernet for the Internet to support this Overnet and
its valid mode of delivery.)
Follow the white
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
Layer 8.
- ferg
Sounds more like a burrito than the internet...
haha, correct
Mehmet Akcin
- Original Message -
From: Tom (UnitedLayer) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Fergie (Paul Ferguson) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 5:27 PM
Subject: Re: Intel calls for Internet overhaul
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004,
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Daniel Golding wrote:
It has become trendy, in some circles,
performance/congestion/non-deterministic nature/lack of security/insert
issue here. After firmly denouncing the Internet, the company or
individual then touts their product, which will fix/replace/augment the
You want to see the future of meritless products, you've
gotta look at the xri and xdi white papers from
oasis-open.org. ROTFL.
Peter
Dan Hollis wrote:
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Andre Oppermann wrote:
PS: I will patent it myself to prevent Versign from doing this.
Wouldnt it be beautiful if a bunch of people patented the hell out of
various ways to exploit dns wildcarding, thus preventing verisign from
doing anything useful
It would only be useful if those people were also in a position to
vigorously defend said patents when (and if) they were infringed.
assign the patents to icann, to the eff, to the registrar constituency ...
Hi, I am preparing to write a research paper for my economics class on the
effect of the internet bubble and burst on the economy. Also, what part (if
any) it played in the most recent recession.
If anyone could point me to any sites with data on the economy at the time and
after I would
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Matthew Sullivan wrote:
Dan Hollis wrote:
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Andre Oppermann wrote:
PS: I will patent it myself to prevent Versign from doing this.
Wouldnt it be beautiful if a bunch of people patented the hell out of
various ways to exploit dns wildcarding, thus
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 04:00:33PM -0700, Conrad Watson wrote:
With all the opinions on this list, I'm sure someone will give me a place to
start. Thank you.
Google.
Contact ChoiceNetworks and they can point you in the right direction, been
there too ;-)
Anyone know the name/contact information of a relatively high Sr.
manager at Verizon involved in their high-cap provisioning in the
NY/NJ metro region? I have a dedicated t1 going on its 4th month on
29 matches
Mail list logo
