On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 17:33:22 -0800, Vicky Rode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> that's why i asked, this type of behavior falls under what abuse terms?
>
> doesn't mean that it shouldn't be blocked/reported.
Block - you have enable on your routers and can do everything from
access list 101 deny to s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The latest release of the Multi-Router Looking Glass (MRLG) is now
available at: ftp://ftp.enterzone.net/looking-glass/CURRENT/
You can see it in action at http://www.ip-guru.com/mrlg/
There are patches available to patch from version 4.3.0 to 5.0.0 an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
in-line:
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
| Vicky Rode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
|
|>not sure if spiders falls under spam or ddos bracket when they
|>repeatedly start hammering one's network. you could possible report to
|>spamcop (*grin*) to get a quic
> > It is a matter of choosing a registrar that has the right business model
> > and services to suit the registrant.
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 01:28:51PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What if a company doesn't want to deal with
> any registrar? What if they just want to
> register their domai
sb> Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 10:14:55 +1100 (EST)
sb> From: snort bsd
sb> are authentication packets between routers and radius
sb> servers encrypted or clear-text?
Let's try Google before NANOG, please.
rfc radius authentication protocol
is a good first attempt.
FWIW, I find it useful
At 06:14 PM 1/21/2005, you wrote:
are authentication packets between routers and radius
servers encrypted or clear-text?
All clear text, but passwords are sent as an MD5 hash which is the result
of a shared secret on both the radius server and the router.
-Robert
Tellurian Networks - The Ultimate
hi:
are authentication packets between routers and radius
servers encrypted or clear-text?
Thanks
dave_au
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today!
http://my.yahoo.com
I saw the Above.Net issue and noticed that Glbx is taking an emergency
maintenance window for tomorrow morning to upgrade router software on ALL
routers (nice). I wonder if this is related since both networks use
Juniper. If anyone has info to share, it would be on-topic I think :)
-Scott Bethk
Additional information on MAC accounting from Hakan Lindholm...
(specifically, the SNMPv2c object to pull 64bit MAC accounting counters)
- Dan
-- Forwarded Message
From: Hakan Lindholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 20:36:45 +0100 (CET)
To: Daniel Golding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 20:16:14 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Analogies suck, but look at (for example) Norton AntiVirus. You pay
> for a year of virus definition updates. Then when the year runs out,
> Symantec is not going to give you a single new virus definition eve
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 09:01:13AM +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
>
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, James Laszko wrote:
>
> > Well, if the router CAN run BGP, the feed from Cymru is only about 84
> > prefixes - not a lot of memory tied up there, is there?
>
> I am *not* talking about the leaf - rather the
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:17:20 -0800, Matt Bazan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We're looking to dip our toes into the global server load balancing
> arena and I'd like to get your advice on the following:
>
> 1) For those of you running a GLSB solution do you perform this 'in
> house' or is it o
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005, David A.Ulevitch wrote:
> We received this totally ambiguous and non-specific message this
> morning:
We got the same thing. According to Cricket BGP update graphs, we had
some AboveNet route flapping at about 3:15AM and again from about
4:00-4:30AM EST. There were some mu
On Jan 21, 2005, at 10:43 AM, Chris A. Epler wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anyone have any details on what is going on with AboveNet? Evidently
something major but our support contacts didn't have a lot of details,
said there'd be something out later this afternoon about it.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anyone have any details on what is going on with AboveNet? Evidently
something major but our support contacts didn't have a lot of details,
said there'd be something out later this afternoon about it. Wondering
if others are experiencing problems with
Hi Matt -
We use F5 (3DNS) equipment to do this for our customers.
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:17:20 -0800
"Matt Bazan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We're looking to dip our toes into the global server load balancing
> arena and I'd like to get your advice on the following:
>
> 1) For those o
On Jan 21, 2005, at 1:14 PM, matthew zeier wrote:
If this is OT, my apologies.
Trying to setup an INOC-DBA account after it was mentioned here a
couple weeks back. I'm stuck after setting up a user account waiting
for the organization's admin (me) to approve it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hasn't respon
Hi folks
since i am the current operator, feel free to write directly to me if you
don't get a response in 36-48 hours.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] hasn't responded to any of my emails but I don't know how
> active that address is. Is this still a live service? If it's simply a
thanks
We're looking to dip our toes into the global server load balancing
arena and I'd like to get your advice on the following:
1) For those of you running a GLSB solution do you perform this 'in
house' or is it outsourced?
2) If running in-house, what gear do you use and how satisfied with it
have
If this is OT, my apologies.
Trying to setup an INOC-DBA account after it was mentioned here a couple
weeks back. I'm stuck after setting up a user account waiting for the
organization's admin (me) to approve it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hasn't responded to any of my emails but I don't know how
activ
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 22 Jan, 2005
At 10:32 AM +0100 1/21/05, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
Remember that the whois protocol is a mess. May be IRIS will fix that.
For those concerned with IRIS, please take time to review the
documents listed at the bottom of this page:
http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/crisp-charter.html
RFCs 3981
> > Well, if the router CAN run BGP, the feed from Cymru is only about 84
> > prefixes - not a lot of memory tied up there, is there?
Not a very wise solution. If hundreds of thousands of routers
take this feed from Cymru, then it won't be long
before someone attacks Cymru in order to control
the
As someone who used to "do" a great deal of managed network
services, I can certainly attest to that.
- ferg
-- "Christopher L. Morrow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, James Laszko wrote:
>
> Well, if the router CAN run BGP, the feed from Cymru is only about 84
> prefixes - no
This report has been generated at Fri Jan 21 21:44:23 2005 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of an AS4637 (Reach) router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/as4637 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table Hist
Hi, Hank.
] How would this scale for say 200K routers? 2M? -Hank
Dave Deitrich of Team Cymru will be presenting on this very
topic at the next NANOG. Short answer: We're ready when
you are. :)
Thanks,
Rob.
--
Rob Thomas
http://www.cymru.com
Shaving with Occam's razor since 1999.
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 05:08:18AM +0100,
Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 61 lines which said:
> Further, these options are not documented anywhere,
In the man page of GNU whois :-)
When querying \fIwhois.denic.de\fP for domain names, the program will
automatically
Steve Sobol wrote:
Matthew Sullivan wrote:
What sort of support would you give a not-for-profit Org such as
SORBS.net or an Org such as Spamhaus.org if our domains were hijacked
maliciously (or not)?
Shouldn't matter, should it?
No, that was my point.
Regards,
Mat
Thornton wrote:
a user can lock a domain..they can login to the control panel for there
registrar and select registrar lock, registrar-lock, or lock and i am
sure there are other registrars that word it even differently. once you
select that it effectively locks your domain so it cant be transfered
Hello William,
> 1. MIT receives transfer request from reseller 2. MIT sends
> email confirmation to whois contact (which contact - tech,
> admin?)
Melbourne IT would collect the WHOIS information for the particular
domain name.
We would store the critical details.
For .com names, we wo
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, James Laszko wrote:
>
> Well, if the router CAN run BGP, the feed from Cymru is only about 84
> prefixes - not a lot of memory tied up there, is there?
>
my point was that not all managed routers, the majority actually, can't
and don't run BGP. their code doesn't even suppor
31 matches
Mail list logo
