What if the USPS decided any magazine you subscribed to was
suddenly unfit for delivery and decided it should blocked (thrown
away)?
They don't decide. I do.
This is not factually true. The USPS has a Postal Inspection Service
that can intercept your mail for various reasons. Details
Is there any new development happening with the NANOG traceroute project?
ftp://ftp.login.com/pub/software/traceroute/
On 2005.03.15 15:03:12 %z, Bruce Pinsky wrote:
Robert Bonomi wrote:
OK, what am I missing?
*ASSUMPTION*:
The holder of the /16 _has_ delegated rDNS for the 32 /24s to the /19 owner.
The /19 owner can, on it's nameserver, run an authoritative zone for
the /16 -- with _its_ /24s listed explicitly, and a wildcard pointing
back to the rDNS
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 15:03 -0800, Bruce Pinsky wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brett Watson wrote:
| On 3/15/05 3:11 AM, Ziggy David Lubowa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
|
|
|On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 17:51:32 +0800 (CST), Joe Shen wrote
|
|Yes. Can I do this on a Linux
Hannigan, Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Third and finally, if you are really not a spammer, or you are truly
reformed,
de-listing is relatively easy. You donate US$50 to a charity or trust
approved
by, and not connected with, SORBS for each spam received relating to the
listing (This is
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What if the USPS decided any magazine you subscribed to was
suddenly unfit for delivery and decided it should blocked (thrown
away)?
They don't decide. I do.
This is not factually true. The USPS has a Postal Inspection Service
that can
At 20:22 -0800 3/15/05, Owen DeLong wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean by sideways delegations. It is
perfectly acceptable, for example, for:
a.root-servers.net returns 16.172.in-addr.arpa. IN NS ns1.arin.net.
ns1.arin.net returns 124.16.172.in-addr.apra. IN NS ns1.foobar.com.
ns1.foobar.com.
At 13:48 -0800 3/16/05, David Raistrick wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Edward Lewis wrote:
aside) to uphold. In the global DNS, no matter where you ask
question, you should get the same answer.
Really?
Yes.
dig @ns1.arin.net 124.16.172.in-addr.arpa. IN NS
and
dig @ns1.foobar.com
2) Use DNAME, RFC 2672. Good luck.
(http://www.isc.org/index.pl?/pubs/tn/index.pl?tn=isc-tn-2002-1.html)
3) Use RFC 2317. I encourage my competitors to operate this way.
Note: DNAME is equivalent to RFC 2317. In both cases this
will break the customers expectation that
At 16:56 -0500 3/16/05, Edward Lewis wrote:
servers in the first belong to 209/8, the latter to 209.173.48/8.
Whoops - the last is /24.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis+1-571-434-5468
NeuStar
I'm afraid that above is not an accurate or workable sequence of events.
Not accurate in the sense that I left out some of the queries and left
it as a summary of the relevant ones, however...
[...bind 9.3.1...] snip
Note too that this is from a fresh (empty) cache. Some queries are not
needed
11 matches
Mail list logo
