Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )

2005-04-02 Thread Peter Corlett
Dan Hollis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > because integrated or pci audio are often plagued by internal > electrical noise. USB largely avoids this by doing all the > conversion externally and largely isolated. Like that's going to matter for a monaural signal that's sampled at 8kHz with 13 b

Re: Yes, I realize it's April Fools Day, but... (was: Cisco to merge with Nabisco)

2005-04-02 Thread Randy Bush
hey joe, > If randy can tell me how to preemptively configure filter recognition > for 'chitchat', then I'll send him some cookies. No points for > reactive, since that is the present mode. if we could clearly define email classification algorithms, with negligible alpha and beta error bounds

Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure

2005-04-02 Thread Daniel Roesen
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 01:48:51PM +0200, Elmar K. Bins wrote: > The other: ICMP has been rate-limited. It might not be the way to > test those locations. An mtr output would be more interesting :) mtr uses ICMP too. Regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure

2005-04-02 Thread Elmar K. Bins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randy Bush) wrote: > > a.nic.de, 100 packets, 7% packet loss > > round-trip min/avg/max = 163.454/199.368/494.708 ms > > > > c.de.net, 100 packets, 2% packet loss > > round-trip min/avg/max = 15.071/46.131/724.957 ms > > > > z.nic.de, 100 packets, 3% packe