Have to admit to being surprised at DENIC poor placing.
The only time I did a comparison, DENIC were by far and away the best European
TLD maintainers.
Okay there wasn't much competition, and I was looking at purely technical
aspects of how the TLD were arranged, but the results were so good
--On 05 April 2005 10:43 +1000 Stephen Baxter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was looking around for any reports, press releases or even yarns about
the issues data centres face when they are built without access to
competitive fibre optic cable.
See MFS MAE-East ad nauseam.
Alex
On Monday 04 Apr 2005 9:56 pm, Sam Hayes Merritt, III wrote:
AOL blocks outbound 25.
In the UK they proxy outbound port 25, some of the time.
Blocking it would be far simpler for us, but I suspect create more support
calls.
On Monday 04 Apr 2005 11:06 am, Sean Donelan wrote:
Although Microsoft probably did more to create the problem than
anyone else, they finally have stepped up to the plate. In the last
year they have been more successful than anyone else at fixing their
piece of the problem.
Like anyone
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Dean Anderson wrote:
Err, not likely. SPF came out, and now bots can find the ISPs closed
relays with very little trouble at all.
AFAIK bots use the MX of a parent domain of the infected machine's
hostname to find an outgoing relay, not SPF. This is based on an
incident I
Police make an arrest in cable sabotage case on Martha's Vineyard,
Massachusetts.
http://news.bostonherald.com/localRegional/view.bg?articleid=76510
On Apr 5, 2005 3:33 PM, Tony Finch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AFAIK bots use the MX of a parent domain of the infected machine's
hostname to find an outgoing relay, not SPF. This is based on an
incident I dealt with in September, and the Spamhaus article
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Others just grab the smtp server (and AUTH settings if any) from your
MUA - easier if its Outlook / OE - and send using that smarthost.
Has that actually been observed in the wild?
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dotat.at/
On Apr 5, 2005 5:56 PM, Tony Finch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Others just grab the smtp server (and AUTH settings if any) from your
MUA - easier if its Outlook / OE - and send using that smarthost.
Has that actually been observed in the
--- Tony Finch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Others just grab the smtp server (and AUTH settings if any) from your
MUA - easier if its Outlook / OE - and send using that smarthost.
Has that actually been observed in the wild?
yes
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Florian Weimer) [Mon 04 Apr 2005, 22:25 CEST]:
* Gadi Evron:
Lastly, I suppose that as a geek ISP, one might want to sell more
bandwidth. After all, the more sh*t that goes through the tubes the
bigger tubes people buy.
Only if the end user market is ready for volume
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Stephen J. Wilcox:
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Gadi Evron wrote:
Anyone ever considered just closing these ports? People will pay you
more and just for your ACL services! You can put all your troubles
you would need to do this on a per
Florian Weimer wrote:
* Suresh Ramasubramanian:
Find them, isolate them into what some providers call a walled
garden - vlan them into their own segment from where all they can
access are antivirus / service pack downloads
Service pack downloads? Do you expect ISPs to pirate Windows (or
North American Network Operators,
Since quite a few of you are also attending the RIPE meetings Susan
though it would be a good idea for me to mention that a (European)
Peering BoF will take place in Stockholm at RIPE50 on Sunday 1st May
2005 and from 18.00 to around 21.00.
The format will be
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem arises when you are trying to push signal (spam) to a
non-cooperating recipient. I've seen spam that's so obfuscated that it's
unclear whether it's trying to sell me a R00leckss or medications. At
that point, it may be able to pass
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Sam Hayes Merritt, III wrote:
Unblocking on customer request is an expensive operation, for both the
ISP and the customer.
And they frequently assume that network operations changes are
free---Comcast reported that it would cost $58 million to implement port
25
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Tony Finch wrote:
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Dean Anderson wrote:
Err, not likely. SPF came out, and now bots can find the ISPs closed
relays with very little trouble at all.
AFAIK bots use the MX of a parent domain of the infected machine's
hostname to find an outgoing
Scathing critisism building over ICANN policies:
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20050405/1329204_F.shtml
- ferg
--
Fergie, a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Register:
The .net report has been speared a third time - by
bidder Sentan.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/04/05/sentan_slams_dot_net_report/
- ferg
--
Fergie, a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fergie (Paul Ferguson)) [Wed 06 Apr 2005, 02:19 CEST]:
The Register:
[..]
Dear Paul,
Would it belong to the realm of possibilities that you got yourself
a deli.cio.us account and post a link to the RSS feed here, once?
Very truly yours,
-- Niels.
--
20 matches
Mail list logo
