On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 03:55:15PM -0700, Vicky Rode wrote:
Just wondering how many have transitioned to djbdns from bind and if so
any feedback.
djbdns has lower performance, both as an authoritative and recursive
resolver, than bind.
It's less flexible than bind9. But it's data files and
I had a play with DJBDNS after using BIND for years. Here's why I
switched back:
- No AXFR support
It supports this.
No IXFR, no automatic notification of bind slaves (you get to run a
separate notify script) ...
But yes, it is far easier to use, consumes very low amounts of
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 03:55:15PM -0700,
Vicky Rode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 20 lines which said:
Just wondering how many have transitioned to djbdns from bind
If transitioning from BIND, why go to the non-free and non-compliant
djbdns instead of nsd
On Apr 8, 2005, at 5:43 PM, Niek wrote:
On 4/9/2005 1:50 AM +0100, Paul Vixie wrote:
Count Server Software
[snip some list]
One could also put together a list based on:
This actually would be an interesting list. Unfortunately, the
criteria you provide are a bit hard to come up with reasonable
Internet Routing Arch.
Routing TCP/IP vol.1
Cisco LAN Switching or Any other LAN switching book
Troubleshooting Routing Protocols by Zaheer Aziz
Cisco ISP essentials
Some chapters of IOS software Arch
On Apr 9, 2005 6:36 AM, Janet Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to make a
Blueprints for High Availability
Ewan Stern Hal Marcus
John Wiley Sons
. High Availability Network Fundamentals
Chris Oggerino
Cisco Press
Fundamental readings for those 24x7 guys.
Abraços,
Marlon Borba, CISSP.
Você prefere sua estabilidade hoje ou
sua felicidade amanhã?
--Max
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Conrad) [Sat 09 Apr 2005, 10:14 CEST]:
[..]
PowerDNS: Yes (authoritative only)
[..]
(I might have gotten some of these wrong)
You are - PowerDNS has pdns_recursor and has for quite a while.
Uses less memory than BIND and is faster too.
Potential conflict of
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 01:14:14AM -0700, David Conrad wrote:
Fortunately, if it is a religion, I am agnostic in the BIND vs. DJB war
since I work for a company that has created a product that could be
argued competes with both... :-).
Didn't Nominum write BIND9, and doesn't / didn't it
Thanks for the kind words.
- ferg
-- Bill Woodcock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to agree... Paul's been doing an excellent job of picking out the
one or two things that really matter each day, and I've found it quite
valuable. I think that unlike much of the administrivial chatter on
Fortunately, if it is a religion, I am agnostic in the BIND vs. DJB war
since I work for a company that has created a product that could be
argued competes with both... :-).
and from what i've heard, everyone who has tested nominum's ANS and/or CNS
has been impressed with the performance,
On Apr 9, 2005, at 9:35 AM, Will Yardley wrote:
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 01:14:14AM -0700, David Conrad wrote:
Fortunately, if it is a religion, I am agnostic in the BIND vs. DJB
war
since I work for a company that has created a product that could be
argued competes with both... :-).
Didn't
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Patrick W Gilmore wrote:
On Apr 8, 2005, at 10:28 AM, Philip Lavine wrote:
I am using AS prepending to favor one ISP over
another, in a BGP multihomed/multiISP scenario. Why
does the ISP receiving the prepends fail to add my
network into their routing table? Is this
On Sat, 9 Apr 2005, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
Just wondering how many have transitioned to djbdns from bind
If transitioning from BIND, why go to the non-free and non-compliant
djbdns instead of nsd (http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/nsd/)?
I couldn't agree more. At least BIND9 and NSD both support RFC
David Conrad wrote:
- Amount of code
Again, what should be counted? Should you include rsync? Should you
include utility programs like check-namedconf, axfr-get, rbldns,
walldns, walldns-conf, etc.?
You need only count the lines of code needed by the daemon/s
servicing requests. That is, IMO,
Janet Sullivan wrote:
I'd like to make a list for the BGP4.net wiki of books that are thought
highly of by the network community. What books stand out for you as
being excellent? If you could only own 5 network related books, what
would they be?
One of my favorites from years back though not
Roger Marquis wrote:
You need only count the lines of code needed by the daemon/s
servicing requests. That is, IMO, bind's only major failing. Too
much code, too many little used features (nobody I know needs or
wants rndc), and no way to compile without them. If you read Bruce
Schneier,
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 04:32:12PM -0700, Roger Marquis wrote:
You need only count the lines of code needed by the daemon/s
servicing requests. That is, IMO, bind's only major failing. Too
much code, too many little used features (nobody I know needs or
wants rndc), and no way to compile
At 07:32 PM 4/9/2005, you wrote:
David Conrad wrote:
- Amount of code
Again, what should be counted? Should you include rsync? Should you
include utility programs like check-namedconf, axfr-get, rbldns, walldns,
walldns-conf, etc.?
You need only count the lines of code needed by the daemon/s
APRICOT 2006 CALL FOR TECHNICAL CONFERENCE TRACK CHAIRS
Asia Pacific Regional Internet Conference on Operational Technologies
Perth, Australia Feb 22 - Mar 3, 2006
The APRICOT 2006 Program Committee is seeking interested and
qualified Track Chairs to actively assist the Committee in
recruiting
You need only count the lines of code needed by the daemon/s
servicing requests. That is, IMO, bind's only major failing. Too
much code, too many little used features (nobody I know needs or
wants rndc), and no way to compile without them. If you read Bruce
Schneier, as every developer
20 matches
Mail list logo
