Re: ATM (with the answer!!!)

2005-07-02 Thread Petri Helenius
Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: On Sat, 2 Jul 2005, John L Lee wrote: With routers you will need to turn buffering off and you will still have propagation in the double to triple milli-seconds range with jitter in the multi milli-seconds range. Please elaborate why a router would have multi-mi

Re: NTIA will control the root name servers?

2005-07-02 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
On 03/07/05, John Palmer (NANOG Acct) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Already entire nations are dropping ICANN. China for one and now > Turkey. > You know something .. the turks, or at least one minor government / industry department there, seem to have been drinking the public root koolaid. >

Re: NTIA will control the root name servers?

2005-07-02 Thread John Palmer (NANOG Acct)
Already entire nations are dropping ICANN. China for one and now Turkey. Istanbul, June 23, 2005 A Top Level Domain (TLD) system has been launched in Turkey as the result of an alliance between the Turkish Informatics Association (TBD) and Unified Identity Technology (UNIDT), officials announc

Re: ATM (with the answer!!!)

2005-07-02 Thread Mikael Abrahamsson
On Sat, 2 Jul 2005, John L Lee wrote: With routers you will need to turn buffering off and you will still have propagation in the double to triple milli-seconds range with jitter in the multi milli-seconds range. Please elaborate why a router would have multi-millisecond propagation delay.

Re: NTIA will control the root name servers?

2005-07-02 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
On 2 Jul 2005 11:56:07 -, John Levine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ICANN's leadership has long claimed and probably believed that the DOC > would eventually cut them free. Of course other governments have never > been thrilled that the root belongs to the US Gov't, but treatment of > countr

Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008

2005-07-02 Thread Todd Vierling
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, Christopher L. Morrow wrote: > > There is not need for NAT in IPv6. Use instead NAP (i.e. Network > > Architecture Protection). > > you are ignoring the reality... people WILL want v6 and nat :( it might be > ugly and distasteful, but the fact remains that people will want and

Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008

2005-07-02 Thread Sean Doran
On 1 Jul, 2005, at 23:16, David Conrad wrote: Remember the marketing hype about OSI? Remember the marketing hype about ATM? Or, back on topic, remember GOSIP? Who's the next Milo? Sean.

Re: ATM (with the answer!!!)

2005-07-02 Thread John L Lee
O ye of little packets (or cells), if you are going to complain about the question at least answer it. ATM Adaptation Layer (AAL) 1, 2, 3 / 4 and 5 AAL 1 – CBR constant bit rate traffic for voice trunks and video. AAL 2 – VBR variable bite rate with a timing relationship between sender and r

Re: NTIA will control the root name servers?

2005-07-02 Thread John Levine
>Is this operational or dross? Both, but mainly it's a one page press release from the Dep't of Commerce: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/USDNSprinciples_06302005.htm ICANN exists because of a DOC contact which you can find at http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/ ICANN's le