<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
eek! There are a couple of downsides to having the
router-ID divorced from a physical address:
1) you get an additional number which you have to have
to track to ensure uniqueness.
2) you lose the benefit of being able to double check
reachability (ping/ssh to rout
--- Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It's worth noting that C's don't need actual IP
> address space assigned to
> the router-id for OSPF. It's just an arbitrary
> value; it's probably better
> karma to set it to whatever you want (maybe
> something that doesn't look
> like an IP addre
It occurred unintentionally during an email account subscription change to
NANOG.
My bad :(
PS -
Randy Bush, is this any better? I.e., any more Microsog noise, herein?
Frank
Thanks for the response.
>
> You want to optimize for the lowest monetary cost
> network that still allows you
> to meet all the SLA's you've negotiated. And this
> depends on what you
> negotiated - for instance, if the SLA specifies 3
> 9's of reliability, spending
> money to build a 4 9's ne
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 15:47:22 +0800, Joe Shen said:
> Is there a common sense on the target of network
> optimization? or is there common startup line of such
> work? What should be the model of a optimized ISP
> network ( or PoP site) ?
You want to optimize for the lowest monetary cost network t
Hi,
this may be a OOO..LD topic which is talked, discussed
or agrued for year. ISP networks may need to be
optimized continuously. But, it seems people have
different view of optimization when they use this word
at different place; sometimes optimization means
adding more access router, add more
