url: http://eusecwest.com
url: http://pacsec.jp
(PacSec/Tokyo Announcement below...)
EUSecWest/core06 CALL FOR PAPERS
London Security Summit February 20/21 2006
LONDON, United Kingdom -- Applied technical security
will be the focus of a new annual conference f
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Matt Ghali wrote:
> Could you take a break from publically insulting your customers, and
> confirm that you have a grasp of what happens when both sides of a
> mirrored pair of disks die within 3 hours of each other?
One replaces the disks and restores from one's backup tape
Matt,
stop trolling. And do real backups, man.
HTH. HAND.
Alexander
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Rodney Joffe wrote:
As one of the remaining idiots, allow me to respond to you
initially here on NANOG - albeit 2 weeks later after being on the
road at NANOG and ARIN.
Thank you for acknowledging my presence as a customer. I had a brief
bout of (mis)communication
Hell Matt,
On 10/14/05 1:50 PM, "Matt Ghali" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I understand that since secondary.com operations were picked up by
UltraDNS, there's been a signifigant brain drain within UDNS
operations, and from what I've heard, there isn't a lot of smarts
left there.
As one of
-Original Message-
From: Telecom Regulation & the Internet
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Cannon
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 4:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [CYBERTEL] FCC Distinguished Engineering Fellow
The Federal Communications Commission would like to an
www.forbes.com/business/manufacturing/feeds/ap/2005/10/31/ap2308682.html
--
Joe McGuckin
ViaNet Communications
994 San Antonio Road
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Phone: 650-213-1302
Cell: 650-207-0372
Fax: 650-969-2124
At 12:56 AM -0400 10/29/05, Daniel Golding wrote:
>I have no specific information, but I'm guessing there is a per-mbps charge
>that kicks in at certain ratio levels. ...
>
>I'm having a bit of trouble figuring out Level(3)'s goal in all this. A bit
>of incremental revenue? For all of this trouble
On 31-Oct-2005, at 17:49, Bill Woodcock wrote:
Which leaves the question of why F, and now K, appear to be trying
to do
it.
F's covering prefix, 192.5.5.0/24, is advertised to peers of F-root
local nodes with NO_EXPORT. 192.5.5.0/24 is advertised to peers of AS
3557 without NO_EXPORT.
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Joe Maimon wrote:
> Isnt this the standard problem?
Correct.
> Why does anycast have any special bearing on the problem?
It doesn't, except that Vixie decided to do it anyway with F, and it
sounds like now K is doing it as well.
I have no clue why. The pro
Randy Bush wrote:
so a few of us are still looking at routing through the anycast
sunglasses. a particular probe is seeing instability [0] for
k.root-servers.net [1]. so we hop on to a router nearby, and
o this obscures their path to k1
o and, as they obey k0's NO_EXPORT, they can
so a few of us are still looking at routing through the anycast
sunglasses. a particular probe is seeing instability [0] for
k.root-servers.net [1]. so we hop on to a router nearby, and
have some fun looking at things. we discover an anomaly which
takes a while to sort out
o some of the anyc
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Matt Taber wrote:
>
> Odd - I am seeing my route die here (from AS7949):
>
> 1 router-sf-t3sf.wmis.net (69.39.94.5) 4 msec 8 msec 4 msec
> 2 69.39.68.169 [AS 12129] 4 msec 12 msec 4 msec
> 3 edge-1.sfld-mi.123.net (216.234.96.2) [AS 12129] 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
> 4 POS2-1.GW4.
Hi, NANOGers.
] Maybe its just _scary_ Halloween routing?
It's definitely Halloween, but this isn't as scary as it looks. :)
] 14 Cisco-Systems-1054141.cust-rtr.ameritech.net...
Back when we were part of Cisco, SBC named our link to them
accordingly. Now that we're on our own, I should prob
Hi, NANOGers.
] Unable to geto to www.cymru.com and 68.22.187.24 has been down
] for 5+ hours. Known issue?
We brought up a new BGP peer today, oddly enough to add additional
redundancy and improved performance. :) The turn-up appears to
have gone awry somewhere in the provider's network, and
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 08:10:37PM +, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
>
> On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Roy Arends wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, matthew zeier wrote:
> >
> > > Unable to geto to www.cymru.com and 68.22.187.24 has been down for 5+
> > > hours.
> > > Known issue?
> >
> > www.cymru
Maybe its just _scary_ Halloween routing?
It works from my view of SBC/Ameritech... even though it looks like its
going through a Cisco Systems customer connection.
6 ex1-g9-0-0.pxatga.sbcglobal.net (151.164.249.9) 17.078 ms 16.964
ms 16.89
1 ms
7 bb2-p3-0.atlnga.sbcglobal.net (151.1
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Roy Arends wrote:
>
> On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, matthew zeier wrote:
>
> > Unable to geto to www.cymru.com and 68.22.187.24 has been down for 5+ hours.
> > Known issue?
>
> www.cymru.com resolves to 68.22.187.27 which is reachable from AS1103.
just to through more fuel on the fir
Odd - I am seeing my route die here (from AS7949):
1 router-sf-t3sf.wmis.net (69.39.94.5) 4 msec 8 msec 4 msec
2 69.39.68.169 [AS 12129] 4 msec 12 msec 4 msec
3 edge-1.sfld-mi.123.net (216.234.96.2) [AS 12129] 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
4 POS2-1.GW4.DET5.ALTER.NET (65.206.123.245) [AS 701] 8 msec 8 ms
Getting hung up in savvis - can't ping through -
1. v140.core1.irv.intelenet.net
2. v8-ge4-1.border4.irv.intelenet.net
3. so-6-0-0.ar3.LAX1.gblx.net
4. so6-0-0-2488M.ar2.PAO2.gblx.net
5. bpr1-so-2-0-0.PaloAltoPaix.savvis.net
6. dcr2-so-3-3-0.SanFranciscosfo.savvis.net
7. dcr1-so-5-0-0.Sa
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, matthew zeier wrote:
> Unable to geto to www.cymru.com and 68.22.187.24 has been down for 5+ hours.
> Known issue?
www.cymru.com resolves to 68.22.187.27 which is reachable from AS1103.
Roy
On Monday, 31-October-2005 13:46, matthew zeier wrote:
> Unable to geto to www.cymru.com and 68.22.187.24 has been down for
> 5+ hours. Known issue?
I think Ameritech/SBC/AT&T has problems here in Chicago. We have had
problems getting to several sites here. Traces across Ameritech's
network di
Unable to geto to www.cymru.com and 68.22.187.24 has been down for 5+ hours.
Known issue?
folx,
a number of people involved with nanog in various official and
unofficial capacities have been having in-depth discussions about how
to make the nanog conference more accessible and productive to
newcomers.
i'm collecting anecdotal (totally bereft of scienctific value) data
about newcome
Hello Folks,
Is it just us, or are others experiencing loss/latency/bgp flapping
within Cogent (AS174) network in Miami? I'm not a direct customer; my
upstream is working with them, and was wondering. This appears to have
started for us 10/29/05 19:40 EDT.
Thanks,
Chris Ranch
25 matches
Mail list logo
