Kevin Day wrote:
On Dec 21, 2005, at 1:34 PM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Kevin Day wrote:
[..]
The disincentives for a small-mid sized network to moving to IPv6 are pretty
big right
now, which means very few of us are going to do it willingly. (Remember,
the little guys are who are going to
However I'm much more concerned that big providers (anyone who can
qualify for a /32) need to make nearly zero changes to their way of
doing things, but MomPop's regional ISP or Chuck's Web Hosting and
Bait Shop are going to be losing out big when it comes to IPv6.
Which is preferable,
Is there any MSN admins on the list that can help. We have a customer
that sends mail to an msn account and sometimes it goes and sometimes it
does not and they are getting very frustrated with our service of course
blaming us. I have logs that show we sent the mail and it was accepted
for
Is anyone aware an API/CLI or other interface that allows for
manipulation of the GSS's dns rules, answers, answer groups, and
domain lists?
I dug through a few of the reference manuals and could find no
reference to manipulation of the devices configuration beyond basic
system
For those of you who make use of the completewhois bogon lists
(apparently there are some)...
It appears that as of this morning they've decided that 204.57.128.0
- 204.255.255.255 belongs in the bogon lists.
G.
Pardon the operational interruption.
I'm aware of that and rerunning the generation program right now. There
is a new server being installed from yesterday to today as replacement
for old and after everything is done things will work much smoother
as the old server ran out of space and is causing problems.
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005,
---Original Message---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Addressing versus Routing (Was: Deploying IPv6 in a datacenter)
Sent: 22 Dec '05 03:55
The RIRs have not made any decisions yet about offering
geotop addresses, but 7/8 of the IPv6 address space has
been
NANOG 36 will be held Feb. 12-15 at the Fairmont hotel in Dallas:
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0602/hotel.html
Our room rate is $145 single/double. Thanks for making this happen,
Carol!
On Dec 22, 2005, at 10:03 AM, william(at)elan.net wrote:
I'm aware of that and rerunning the generation program right now.
There is a new server being installed from yesterday to today as
replacement
for old and after everything is done things will work much smoother
as the old server
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, Rodney Joffe wrote:
I'm aware of that and rerunning the generation program right now. There is
a new server being installed from yesterday to today as replacement
for old and after everything is done things will work much smoother
as the old server ran out of space and
At 12:56 PM 12/22/2005, you wrote:
P.S. 204/8 was not the only problem, there were problems with 128/8 and
133/8 as well so my apologies to people who may have noticed problems
overnight.
199.128.0.0/9 too.
-Robert
Tellurian Networks - The Ultimate Internet Connection
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, Robert Boyle wrote:
At 12:56 PM 12/22/2005, you wrote:
P.S. 204/8 was not the only problem, there were problems with 128/8 and
133/8 as well so my apologies to people who may have noticed problems
overnight.
199.128.0.0/9 too.
Yes, legacy blocks (with large number of
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, william(at)elan.net wrote:
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, Robert Boyle wrote:
At 12:56 PM 12/22/2005, you wrote:
P.S. 204/8 was not the only problem, there were problems with 128/8 and
133/8 as well so my apologies to people who may have noticed problems
overnight.
On 12/22/05 1:35 PM, Christopher L. Morrow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, william(at)elan.net wrote:
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, Robert Boyle wrote:
At 12:56 PM 12/22/2005, you wrote:
P.S. 204/8 was not the only problem, there were problems with 128/8 and
133/8 as well
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, Daniel Golding wrote:
On 12/22/05 1:35 PM, Christopher L. Morrow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
'most serious problem in months' ... this has happened in smaller chunks
during the past 'months' ? yikes... is that noted on your site so users of
the 'service' will know
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
Yes, legacy blocks (with large number of smaller allocations) whenever
datasize during processing exceeded certain amount. The bad data was
present at 2 of 4 servers for duration of the night but dns was being
so 50+% of your system was
On 12/22/05 1:35 PM, Christopher L. Morrow
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, william(at)elan.net wrote:
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, Robert Boyle wrote:
At 12:56 PM 12/22/2005, you wrote:
P.S. 204/8 was not the only problem, there were problems
with 128/8
I'm curious to find out if there is a device that would allow a single
DS3 to terminate on two different routers, and switch from the primary
to the backup router if the primary were to fail. I've seen this for
T1 circuits but I can't find anything for DS3.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
John
--
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:21:55PM -0700, John Neiberger wrote:
I'm curious to find out if there is a device that would allow a single
DS3 to terminate on two different routers, and switch from the primary
to the backup router if the primary were to fail. I've seen this for
T1 circuits but I
Ok, I promise this is my last reply to the list about this... This
has gone too far into theoretical and not operational content, and
probably belongs on an IPv6 policy list, so I'll hush. :) I'll
follow up with anyone privately who wants to continue the discussion
though.
On Dec 22,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:21:55PM -0700, John Neiberger wrote:
I'm curious to find out if there is a device that would allow a single
DS3 to terminate on two different routers, and switch from the primary
to the backup router if the primary were to fail. I've seen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/22/05 12:35:36 PM
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:21:55PM -0700, John Neiberger wrote:
I'm curious to find out if there is a device that would allow a
single
DS3 to terminate on two different routers, and switch from the
primary
to the backup router if the primary were to
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 14:05:25 -0500
From: Hannigan, Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Bogon stupidity... warning... operational post.
[ ... ]
Use a blacklist, pay the price. I'd like to know how many
people actually went to their boss and
23 matches
Mail list logo
