I need to find a third party who can help us figure out *what* is at fault,
even more importantly than who. Please contact me off list for details.
Thanks,
Eric
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 11:43:59AM -0800, Matt Ghali wrote:
>
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Bill Nash wrote:
>
> >You will not learn hatred until that MMO you host implements a 'Report
> >network problem' button that does a traceroute, and automatically emails
> >it and a canned message to your NOC m
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Bill Nash wrote:
You will not learn hatred until that MMO you host implements a 'Report network
problem' button that does a traceroute, and automatically emails it and a
canned message to your NOC mailbox. Ultima Online did this, back in my nocling
days. Like monkeys expe
On 3/7/06, Gunther Stammwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Does anyone know some kind of tool?
Just as I suspected: no one outside of the lab uses tools like owamp
for real-world monitoring.
aaron.glenn
Gunther Stammwitz writes:
> ==> Which tools (under linux) are you using in order to measure your
> own network ore on of your upstreams in terms of "gameability" or
> voip-usage?
My favorite tool for assessing delay distribution and loss over time
is Tobi Oetiker's (of MRTG fame) SmokePing (http:
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 11 Mar, 2006
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 11:52:40AM +, tony sarendal wrote:
Does traceroute really do that ? Even for ICMP.
Think about it.
Hint: the return packets your traceroute produces,
do they have the same return path for every hop ?
Think Inter
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 11:52:40AM +, tony sarendal wrote:
>
> Does traceroute really do that ? Even for ICMP.
> Think about it.
>
> Hint: the return packets your traceroute produces,
> do they have the same return path for every hop ?
>
> Think Internet, think large providers with many pee
Drew Weaver wrote:
We have heard a lot of negatives about them, about their pricing
model, about their network, about de-peering with Level 3, etc. What we
really need is actual information.
Here's a good one about Cogent. 100BaseTX connection from us to a
Cogent Cat3550 ("A"). "A"
On 10/03/06, Mark Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 23:33:44 +"tony sarendal" <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> On 07/03/06, Gunther Stammwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> >> >> > Well that's true but Iperf won't show you at which time a loss occured. It
> > will simply print out t
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 23:33:44 +
"tony sarendal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 07/03/06, Gunther Stammwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Well that's true but Iperf won't show you at which time a loss occured. It
> > will simply print out the results when the test has been finished. I
This report has been generated at Fri Mar 10 21:48:43 2006 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of an AS4637 (Reach) router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/as4637 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table Hist
12 matches
Mail list logo
