Hello,
I wonder if anyone has done any estimates on how many
percent of the Internet traffic:
A) does not pass a peering relationship
(i.e. is AS internal or passes through transit connections only)
B) passes a public peering relationship
C) passes a private peering relationship
I know this
At the risk of posting a 'me too' email, we have also had issues getting a
similar problem resolved with AOL. We have been receiving numerous ISP:B2 and
ISP:B3 rejection codes from AOL email servers. We have contacted their
postmaster # as posted on their website and each time talked with a very
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 08:21:04PM -0400, Martin Hannigan wrote:
> The killer here is that they asked a lot of people a year ago whether this
> was a good idea and everyone said no.
Agreed.
It's just the latest in the series of fiascos that we've seen when
people try to respond to abuse with abu
At 07:16 PM 5/4/2006, william(at)elan.net wrote:
On Thu, 4 May 2006, Martin Hannigan wrote:
At 11:15 AM 5/3/2006, John Levine wrote:
>Uh. Who let the Frog out?
>
>http://www.wired.com/news/technology/internet/0,70798-0.html?tw=r
ss .technology
It's all explained here:
http://weblog.johnle
On Thu, 4 May 2006, Martin Hannigan wrote:
At 11:15 AM 5/3/2006, John Levine wrote:
>Uh. Who let the Frog out?
>
>http://www.wired.com/news/technology/internet/0,70798-0.html?tw=rss
.technology
It's all explained here:
http://weblog.johnlevine.com/2006/05/03
And this just hit wires with
Does anyone have a
Google contact I can email, other then whats posted on the website? I have been
emailing the posted contacts and have not received any response.
Thanks
At 11:15 AM 5/3/2006, John Levine wrote:
>Uh. Who let the Frog out?
>
>http://www.wired.com/news/technology/internet/0,70798-0.html?tw=rss
.technology
It's all explained here:
http://weblog.johnlevine.com/2006/05/03
And this just hit wires with quotes from Renesys and SANS ISC.
http://w
Is there anyone on the list from crystaltech.com if so can someone contact
me off list. Your customers are having problems reaching my mx record and
mail from you all to our domains are bouncing.
On 5/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
why would anyone do that?
--bill
Some companies feel entitled to charging more for their routes than
they would for simple transit.
aaron.glenn
Matthew Black wrote:
For what it's worth, I received a very nice e-mail and had an
extended telephone conversation with a third-tier support
manager from AOL. They do respond and that's why I placed my
original post on this thread.
I too received contact from AOL, and they have been extremel
On Thu, 4 May 2006 10:47:28 -0700 (PDT)
Matt Ghali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 3 May 2006, Joe Maimon wrote:
You know, people say things like this a lot. Its not relevant. What is
relevant is how AOL is supposed to know that
a) the email considered for rejection is actually wanted
Well, I suppose that depends on what you mean by Tier 1. ;-)
We do buy from a number of providers, many of which would be considered
Tier 1 by many people.
On Thu, 4 May 2006, Jon Lyons wrote:
Internap?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 11:25:35AM -0500, John Dupuy wrote:
On Wed, 3 May 2006, Joe Maimon wrote:
You know, people say things like this a lot. Its not relevant. What is
relevant is how AOL is supposed to know that
a) the email considered for rejection is actually wanted
b) and wanted by AOL employees themselves
And if they did know how to accuratel
Don't barrage them with bogus joejob bounce notifications?
IIRC that is a feature of your mail configuration down there.
matto
On Wed, 3 May 2006, Matthew Black wrote:
We've noticed a surge in 421 e-mail errors from AOL.
Message soft bounced for '[EMAIL PROTECTED]', '4.3.2 - Not accepting me
At 12:57 PM 5/4/2006, Jon Lyons wrote:
Internap?
Yes. That's what I was thinking, but too easy?
-M<
--
Martin Hannigan(c) 617-388-2663
Renesys Corporation(w) 617-395-8574
Member of Technical Staff Networ
Internap?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 11:25:35AM -0500, John Dupuy wrote:> > From an off-list discussion:> > Does anyone know of an ISP that has paid transit from all known SFP > (Tier 1) providers? (sort of the old SAVVIS model on steroids.)> > John why would anyone do that?--
Internap?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 11:25:35AM -0500, John Dupuy wrote:> > From an off-list discussion:> > Does anyone know of an ISP that has paid transit from all known SFP > (Tier 1) providers? (sort of the old SAVVIS model on steroids.)> > John why would anyone do that?--
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 11:25:35AM -0500, John Dupuy wrote:
>
> From an off-list discussion:
>
> Does anyone know of an ISP that has paid transit from all known SFP
> (Tier 1) providers? (sort of the old SAVVIS model on steroids.)
>
> John
why would anyone do that?
--bill
From an off-list discussion:
Does anyone know of an ISP that has paid transit from all known SFP
(Tier 1) providers? (sort of the old SAVVIS model on steroids.)
John
On 5/4/06, Simon Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just point your intended receivers to AOL's help desk.
That just creates Chinese whispers.
You can probably do that - but dont astroturf the postmasters, dont
setup boilerplate that you ask people to email in en masse to their
abuse desk o
On Wednesday 03 May 2006 22:28, Joe Maimon wrote:
>
>
> You know, people say things like this a lot. Its not relevant. What is
> relevant is how AOL is supposed to know that
On the subject of which I'm in discussion with AOL to get email through that
contains something which is a known spammers
> to underline a point made previously though: Tier-1 is a routing
> architecture term that doesn't have any useful direct bearing in how
> best to select a service provider. some of the best service providers
> in the world are not "tier-1" and some of the worst are ( i won't name
> members of
22 matches
Mail list logo
