Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 08:50:29 -0400
From: Joe Abley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Spain was offline
[ SNIP ]
You seem to be suggesting that ISPs run stealth slaves for these
kinds of zones. This may have been a useful pointer for ISPs in days
gone by, but I think today it's impractical
[EMAIL PROTECTED] host www.red.es
www.red.es is an alias for web.red.es.
web.red.es has address 194.69.254.50
No idea what happened, and I don't read spanish,
According to red.es, they believe that a possible
hardware failure caused a file to be corrupted
during the update. When this was
This report has been generated at Fri Sep 1 21:45:31 2006 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of an AS4637 (Reach) router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/as4637 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table
Copies of this report are mailed to:
nanog@merit.edu
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From the ISC:
We have received a report of the Cogent Data Center in Herndon, VA
having connectivity problems. It appears to be localized. No need
to innundate them with phone calls, I am sure they are working on it.
One of our readers, Colin, called into the data center: I called
On 1 Sep 2006, at 16:22, Myke Lyons wrote:
From the ISC:
We have received a report of the Cogent Data Center in Herndon, VA
having connectivity problems. It appears to be localized. No need
to innundate them with phone calls, I am sure they are working on it.
One of our readers,
Myke Lyons wrote:
Update #1It appears that sometime on Wednesday that the problems were
more widespread, as they had some latency problems up in New York as
well, as reported by another reader. However it appears that the
problems had been resolved as of Thursday. No report yet on if the
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Tony Li wrote:
I've taken the rather extreme approach of bouncing everything through
Gmail first. Let's see them block Google. ;-)
Patient: Doctor, Doctor, It hurts when I do this.
Doctor: Don't do that.
There are lots of Mail Service Providers. AOL, Comcast, Gmail,
Apologies to the list, but, I'm at Witts End on this problem.Can someone from SBCGLOBAL with 1/2 a clue please contact me?I'm seeing an issue between dist4-g9-3.pltnca.sbcglobal.net andbras2-g9-0.pltnca.sbcglobal.net with intermittent complete packetloss... Matt's
I think my previous post may have touched on a more global issue.
Given the number of such posts I have seen over time, and, my
experiences trying to
report problems to other ISPs in the past, it seems to me that a high
percentage of
ISPs, especially the larger ones, simply don't allow for
On 1-Sep-2006, at 02:11, Martin Hannigan wrote:
You seem to be suggesting that ISPs run stealth slaves for these
kinds of zones. This may have been a useful pointer for ISPs in days
gone by, but I think today it's impractical advice.
How so? Anyone can get a zone and turn up [a-m] on-net
and
At 12:26 PM 9/1/2006, Owen DeLong wrote:
I think my previous post may have touched on a more global issue.
Given the number of such posts I have seen over time, and, my
experiences trying to
report problems to other ISPs in the past, it seems to me that a high
percentage of
ISPs, especially
on Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 11:45:53AM -0400, Sean Donelan wrote:
For example, Gmail doesn't include the originating IP address in its
email which makes it even more difficult for spam filters to judge its
reputation.
You misspelled makes it a veritable haven for 419 scammers.
--
It seems you are null-routing traffic heading towards our /20. If
there are any comcast chaps on this list, please drop me a mail - this
has been going on for a few days now and we're having trouble getting
it escalated to someone with sufficient access to check it.
Thanks,
Ras
At 12:37 PM 9/1/2006, Joe Abley wrote:
On 1-Sep-2006, at 02:11, Martin Hannigan wrote:
You seem to be suggesting that ISPs run stealth slaves for these
kinds of zones. This may have been a useful pointer for ISPs in days
gone by, but I think today it's impractical advice.
How so? Anyone can
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For historical data, please see http://thyme.apnic.net.
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith [EMAIL
On 1-Sep-2006, at 13:47, Martin Hannigan wrote:
I can't get a TLD zone?
*You* can do anything, Marty! You are the man! :-)
But back to the root servers. Are you
agreering with me that if I announce F and I root's netblocks
inside of my own network that everyone would be ok with that?
At 02:36 PM 9/1/2006, Joe Abley wrote:
On 1-Sep-2006, at 13:47, Martin Hannigan wrote:
I can't get a TLD zone?
*You* can do anything, Marty! You are the man! :-)
Well, let's rephrase that. Anyone can't get a TLD zone?
And no, you are the man. :)
But back to the root servers. Are you
On 1-Sep-2006, at 15:07, Martin Hannigan wrote:
Well, let's rephrase that. Anyone can't get a TLD zone?
While there are many smaller TLD zones that don't get updated very
often and which have wide-open AXFR to all and sundry, I'm betting
that the majority of zones that people on this
At 03:50 PM 9/1/2006, Joe Abley wrote:
On 1-Sep-2006, at 15:07, Martin Hannigan wrote:
Well, let's rephrase that. Anyone can't get a TLD zone?
While there are many smaller TLD zones that don't get updated very
often and which have wide-open AXFR to all and sundry, I'm betting
that the
Joe Abley wrote:
Well, let's rephrase that. Anyone can't get a TLD zone?
While there are many smaller TLD zones that don't get updated very often
and which have wide-open AXFR to all and sundry, I'm betting that the
majority of zones that people on this list care about either update
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Owen DeLong wrote:
I think my previous post may have touched on a more global issue.
Given the number of such posts I have seen over time, and, my
experiences trying to report problems to other ISPs in the past, it
seems to me that a high percentage of ISPs, especially
On 1-Sep-2006, at 18:48, Steve Gibbard wrote:
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Owen DeLong wrote:
I think my previous post may have touched on a more global issue.
Given the number of such posts I have seen over time, and, my
experiences trying to report problems to other ISPs in the past,
it seems
You're absolutely right, but your struggle is uphill. Some considerable
time ago my XO (James Aldridge) had a big hand in RFC2142, but in spite
of it being Standards Track and otherwise receiving universal approval,
real uptake was patchy. In fact, in spite of most peering contracts (which
On Sep 1, 2006, at 6:33 PM, Brandon Galbraith wrote:
I never understood why Gmail didn't put an X-Originating-From
header in mail sent out by web users.
Seconded! It may not be a requirement but the omission is certainly
inconsistent with most web-based email services, particularly a
Ack: X-Originating-From should be mandatory.
$.02,
- ferg
-- David Ulevitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 1, 2006, at 6:33 PM, Brandon Galbraith wrote:
I never understood why Gmail didn't put an X-Originating-From
header in mail sent out by web users.
Seconded! It may not be a
Anyone have a clueful contact at Register.Com? Their front-line customer
support is saying we need to talk to a dept that is supposedly 24/7 but
they won't give its name or its extension.
Our customer has asked to help them resolve an issue regarding a domain
that is on registrar-hold and
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Owen DeLong wrote:
I'm curious how people feel about this. As I see it, there are a number of
possible responses:
I think you omitted at least one other option.
Contact your own ISP, i.e. the provider you pay, and report the problem.
You make the choice how much support
28 matches
Mail list logo
