Drew,
There is definitely a power outage at telx/60 Hudson. According to telx,
this was a scheduled maintenance gone bad. I have someone onsite and he is
reporting that power should be restored shortly.
Note, those with redundant feeds within the facility should only see a
partial outage.
Reg
Thanks to netops at: nLayer, Cogent, HE for working tirelessly to help
mitigate this.
No thanks to Level(3) despite the best intentions of one sec-ops person
(Richard).
-david
Nate Carlson wrote:
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, david raistrick wrote:
got off the phone with davidu just a second ago.
One of our transits is reporting a power outage at Telx in NYC tonight.
Does anyone else have any reports of a power problem in that facility?
We're trying to get some word from Telx now too, but they're slow to
respond.
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, david raistrick wrote:
got off the phone with davidu just a second ago. DoS. they're working
on it,.
Yeah, that's the only thing I'd really expect to take them down.
Thanks much for the confirmation!
--
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Nate Carlson wrote:
Anyone here know someone who works on EveryDNS.net? None of their four DNS
servers are responding for me from multiple locations; I'm guessing a
wide-spread DoS?
got off the phone with davidu just a second ago. DoS. they're working on
it,.
--
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 17:04:38 GMT, "Chris L. Morrow" said:
> On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Routers on stub ASs don't need upgrading at all, for instance.
>
> but filter lists and such I imagine might :(
But the industry *did* learn its lesson with 69/8, didn't it?
pgpLarx6YnAU
Anyone here know someone who works on EveryDNS.net? None of their four DNS
servers are responding for me from multiple locations; I'm guessing a
wide-spread DoS?
The phone number in their whois record does not work. :(
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 09:49:25PM +0200, Petri Helenius wrote:
>
> Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
> >
> >
> >This is an excellent idea, but please do not select the first block
> >after 16 bit numbers are up (can you say buffer overflow?). Something
> >random, in the middle, would be better.
> >
> 27525
Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
This is an excellent idea, but please do not select the first block
after 16 bit numbers are up (can you say buffer overflow?). Something
random, in the middle, would be better.
2752512-2818047 ?
Pete
Roland Dobbins wrote:
On Dec 1, 2006, at 4:50 AM, Andy Davidson wrote:
RIPE will be accepting requests for 32-bit ASNs from 1/1/07,
according to an email to ncc-services two weeks ago.
Is there any possibility we can now get a block of ASNs set aside for
documentation purposes, akin to
On Dec 1, 2006, at 4:50 AM, Andy Davidson wrote:
RIPE will be accepting requests for 32-bit ASNs from 1/1/07,
according to an email to ncc-services two weeks ago. It does not
feel too early to start to understand what we must do to as a
community to guarantee ubiquity of reachable networ
agreed, let's NOT do the v6 thing... do the 32-bit asn's give us more than
just 'more bits' ? :) (Sorry, I couldn't resist). So, yes, let's get
someone to start testing, I'd just caution on assigning the 32-bit asn's
for real-users, since much of the net might not be able to use them,
partial re
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For historical data, please see http://thyme.apnic.net.
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Dec 1, 2006, at 10:54 AM, Chris L. Morrow wrote:
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Henk Uijterwaal wrote:
Last time I spoke to them, the Juniper and Cisco versions only ran on
a subset of their routers. Their claim was that almost nobody had
asked for this so it doesn't have any priority.
'the pow
aren't there still plenty (+20k or so) 16-bit ASN's out there
for assignment? (perhaps I'm missing something on the need to allocate the
new asn's?)
By all means let's wait until the last possible second to upgrade ASN
support. The waiting approach has worked so well for IPV6 :) Seriously
thoug
* Chris L. Morrow:
>> | 6. Transition
>> |
>> |The scheme described in this document allows a gradual transition
>> |from 2-octet AS numbers to 4-octet AS numbers. One can upgrade one
>> |Autonomous System or one BGP speaker at a time.
>>
>> Routers on stub ASs don't need upgrading at
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Chris L. Morrow:
>
> > So, all of the current devices need to get upgraded before 'day one' of
> > 32-bit ASN use... that'll be fun :)
>
> | 6. Transition
> |
> |The scheme described in this document allows a gradual transition
> |from 2-octe
* Chris L. Morrow:
> So, all of the current devices need to get upgraded before 'day one' of
> 32-bit ASN use... that'll be fun :)
| 6. Transition
|
|The scheme described in this document allows a gradual transition
|from 2-octet AS numbers to 4-octet AS numbers. One can upgrade one
|
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Donald Stahl wrote:
> > So, all of the current devices need to get upgraded before 'day one' of
> > 32-bit ASN use... that'll be fun :) Why is RIPE passing out the 32-bit
> > ASN's now?
> ARIN will begin passing out 32 bit ASN's to anyone who asks as of January
> 1, 2007. Th
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 16:02:55 + (GMT)
> "Chris L. Morrow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So, all of the current devices need to get upgraded before 'day one'
> > of 32-bit ASN use... that'll be fun :) Why is RIPE passing out the
> > 32-bit ASN'
So, all of the current devices need to get upgraded before 'day one' of
32-bit ASN use... that'll be fun :) Why is RIPE passing out the 32-bit
ASN's now?
ARIN will begin passing out 32 bit ASN's to anyone who asks as of January
1, 2007. This is the same policy as RIPE so I don't see what the bi
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 16:02:55 + (GMT)
"Chris L. Morrow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Andy Davidson wrote:
> >
> > RIPE will be accepting requests for 32-bit ASNs from 1/1/07,
> > according to an email to ncc-services two weeks ago. It does not
> > feel too early to s
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Andy Davidson wrote:
>
> RIPE will be accepting requests for 32-bit ASNs from 1/1/07,
> according to an email to ncc-services two weeks ago. It does not
> feel too early to start to understand what we must do to as a
> community to guarantee ubiquity of reachable networks.
S
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Henk Uijterwaal wrote:
>
> Last time I spoke to them, the Juniper and Cisco versions only ran on
> a subset of their routers. Their claim was that almost nobody had
> asked for this so it doesn't have any priority.
'the power of the market place!' ... perhaps now is the tim
On 12/1/06, Eric Gauthier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Audie,
> Sprint technician informed us that there was a power outage in the
Baltimore
> site on 11/28/06 between 2-3:00 PM EST. During this outage, several our
> clients could access our network. This incident re-occured again the
next
> da
Audie,
> Sprint technician informed us that there was a power outage in the Baltimore
> site on 11/28/06 between 2-3:00 PM EST. During this outage, several our
> clients could access our network. This incident re-occured again the next
> day between 1:45-4:15 PM.
We peer with Sprint in Boston
Sprint technician informed us that there was a power outage in the Baltimore
site on 11/28/06 between 2-3:00 PM EST. During this outage, several our
clients could access our network. This incident re-occured again the next
day between 1:45-4:15 PM.
Does anyone have further info?
thanks,
Audie
On 30 Nov 2006, at 07:02, Chris L. Morrow wrote:
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Deepak Jain wrote:
Afraid so. I'm hoping to be out of the industry before calls for
128 bit
AS#s come down the pipe and people (at that time) are laughing
about how
silly 32 bit AS#s seem.
anyone have a swag at the numb
28 matches
Mail list logo
