On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, JP Velders wrote:
> > defcon or CCC "extreme networking".
>
> For another form of "extreme networking", you could check out what's
I "stole" the name from the programming world with "extreme coding". I
somehow feel it fits.
> built every year for the SC Conference: https://
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Gadi Evron wrote:
Speaking of IPv4, an interesting thing from the CCC presentation was
that the IPV6 space used equaled (if I got this right) the entire EU
IPv6 normal use.
Would this be that the 100-150 megabit/s of IPv6 used at 23C3 equaled the
100-150 megabit/s of IPv
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Amar wrote:
>
> Mattias Ahnberg wrote:
>
> > We've been given a /16 each time so each visitor has had a fully public IP,
> > and the bandwidth has been provided by Telia the last couple of years. On
> > the hardware side we've both built it all with Extreme Networks equipment
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Jeroen Massar wrote:
You could also check http://www.ris.ripe.net/ and use that tool to
determine exactly which networks are not seeing you and then contact
those operators to fix their setups.
And for people not peering with RIS yet, PEER! (info at the url)
Well, the undo
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 02:14:43PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
> > Anyway, I wouldn't write a letter with nothing worth reading on the
> > first page. I don't write articles with nothing in the first
> > paragraph.
>
> Nor do I, but there is a well-established tradition
> in written Engl
Somewhere in the following confused ramble may actually be the only
cogent argument for top-posting I've seen.
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 09:52:29AM +, Alexander Harrowell wrote:
>
> For those of us who read nanog from a mobile device, it's incredibly
> annoying to have no content in the first
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Nachman Yaakov Ziskind wrote:
25 11.11.11.2 44 msec
26 11.11.11.1 48 msec
27 11.11.11.2 48 msec
28 11.11.11.1 48 msec
Yep. Way cool.
Unfortunately it's not the first time that:
1) someone with enable screwed up a routing design or did something dumb
like dueling static
Elijah Savage wrote (on Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 03:28:13PM -0500):
>
> Anyone else see this from their paths?
>
> vader# whois -h whois.cymru.com " -v 11.11.11.2"
> AS | IP | BGP Prefix | CC | Registry | Allocated | AS Name
> NA | 11.11.11.2 | NA | US | arin | 1984-01-19 | NA
>
> #trace
> Pro
Anyone else see this from their paths?
vader# whois -h whois.cymru.com " -v 11.11.11.2"
AS | IP | BGP Prefix | CC | Registry | Allocated | AS Name
NA | 11.11.11.2 | NA | US | arin | 1984-01-19 | NA
#trace
Protocol [ip]:
Target IP address: 66.80.187.122
Source address:
Numeric disp
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > And aren't seen through gblx. I also think I can't see those prefixes
> > through verizon.
probably gustavo means verizonbusiness here, and probably vzb-US (as701),
it's in 702 though.
>
> Also not seen via Telia (1299) or Level3 (3356).
>
> S
not seeing any routes through Level3 or INAP
On Jan 4, 2007, at 5:57 AM, Sebastian Rusek wrote:
Hi,
Since November 2006 we announce our 3 new prefixes:
194.60.78.0/24
194.60.204.0/24
194.153.114.0/24
from new AS41961.
It seems that somewhere our announcements are blocked probably due
t
> Since November 2006 we announce our 3 new prefixes:
>
> 194.60.78.0/24
> 194.60.204.0/24
> 194.153.114.0/24
>
> from new AS41961.
you may want to use the views from route-views.org and ripe's ris
project, as opposed to getting email from the very same folk who
contribute to them :).
looks to
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Gadi Evron wrote:
> Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 17:16:04 -0600 (CST)
> From: Gadi Evron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Router and Infrastructure Hacking (CCC conference last week)
> [ ... ]
> 4. I do wish the talk on how CCC set up their multiple-uplink GigE network
> for the confe
Not seen from ASN7046
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mattias Ahnberg) [Thu 04 Jan 2007, 12:31 CET]:
Amar wrote:
You forgot to mention that there was also IPv6 connectivity ;-)
*grin* How many kilobit IPv6 traffic did we push, you know? :P
23C3 did a few hundred Mbps - check the slides Gadi posted a link to.
(Data was based
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Pete Templin wrote:
> This "place" is full of people with opinions. Some like it hot, some like it
> not. We are never going to agree on top/inline/bottom posting.
> Why can't we all just get along and discuss operational issues?
>
Let's throw preference out the window a
Qwest appears not show it (traceroute dies at the first IP in their
network) and Cogent and LambdaNET show a jump from 90ms to 170ms between
their networks (in two different places depending on IP tracerouted) -
but it does go through.
--
Jeff Shultz
Not seeing any of the routes, or any routes from AS41961. UUNET, Sprint,
and AT&T connectivity.
On Thu, January 4, 2007 05:57, Sebastian Rusek wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Since November 2006 we announce our 3 new prefixes:
>
> 194.60.78.0/24
> 194.60.204.0/24
> 194.153.114.0/24
>
> from new AS41961.
>
> "Sebastian" == Sebastian Rusek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sebastian> Hi,
Sebastian> Since November 2006 we announce our 3 new prefixes:
Sebastian> 194.60.78.0/24
Sebastian> 194.60.204.0/24
Sebastian> 194.153.114.0/24
Sebastian> from new AS41961.
Sebastian> It seems that somewher
Sebastian Rusek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since November 2006 we announce our 3 new prefixes:
[..]
> Could you please check your configuration or help us to isolate the problem?
You could also check http://www.ris.ripe.net/ and use that tool to
determine exactly which networks are not seeing you and then
Yes, I should have made that clear, not received through Level 3 at
AS 16517. (But, Cogent has them.)
On Jan 4, 2007, at 11:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And aren't seen through gblx. I also think I can't see those prefixes
through verizon.
Also not seen via Telia (1299) or Level3 (33
> And aren't seen through gblx. I also think I can't see those prefixes
> through verizon.
Also not seen via Telia (1299) or Level3 (3356).
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And aren't seen through gblx. I also think I can't see those prefixes
through verizon.
Gustavo.
Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>
> They are seen here, through Cogent :
>
> *> 194.60.78.0 38.101.161.1164001 0 174 13237
> 41961 i
> *> 194.60.204.0 38.101.161.1164001
now pingable addresses are:
194.60.78.254
194.60.204.254
194.153.114.254
From one location, things die as soon as they hit AT&T, another location
things work perfectly.
I have a couple of networks off AT&T and I am not seeing these routes in
my tables. I do see them off other networks, howeve
Sebastian Rusek wrote:
Dnia czwartek 04 stycznia 2007 15:06, napisałeś:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sebastian Rusek) wrote:
Since November 2006 we announce our 3 new prefixes:
194.60.78.0/24
194.60.204.0/24
194.153.114.0/24
from new AS41961.
It seems that somewhere our announcements are blocked prob
> now pingable addresses are:
> 194.60.78.254
> 194.60.204.254
> 194.153.114.254
>
> They should be accessible via LambdaNET. Routes inside LambdaNET can be
> diffrent to each address.
Everything looks fine from here (AS 2116), prefixes reachable and
addresses pingable. Example traceroute below
Dnia czwartek 04 stycznia 2007 15:06, napisałeś:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sebastian Rusek) wrote:
> > Since November 2006 we announce our 3 new prefixes:
> >
> > 194.60.78.0/24
> > 194.60.204.0/24
> > 194.153.114.0/24
> >
> > from new AS41961.
> >
> > It seems that somewhere our announcements are bloc
> (All right then, scroll down for content :-))
It is not necessary to quote an entire message
when you are only replying to one specific
part of it.
> Minority? A mail client has been standard-ish for the last three to
> four years of upgrade iterations. There are a LOT of mobiles out
> there.
They are seen here, through Cogent :
*> 194.60.78.0 38.101.161.1164001 0 174
13237 41961 i
*> 194.60.204.0 38.101.161.1164001 0 174
13237 41961 i
*> 194.153.114.038.101.161.1164001 0 174
13237 41961 i
Regards
Marsha
Alexander Harrowell wrote:
Anyway, I wouldn't write a letter with nothing worth reading on the
first page. I don't write articles with nothing in the first
paragraph. Why should over a billion users of the English language,
etc, etc..
We're not talking about a letter or an article. We're tal
Hi Sebastian,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sebastian Rusek) wrote:
> Since November 2006 we announce our 3 new prefixes:
>
> 194.60.78.0/24
> 194.60.204.0/24
> 194.153.114.0/24
>
> from new AS41961.
>
> It seems that somewhere our announcements are blocked probably due to bogon
> lists.
To make it ea
Hi,
Since November 2006 we announce our 3 new prefixes:
194.60.78.0/24
194.60.204.0/24
194.153.114.0/24
from new AS41961.
It seems that somewhere our announcements are blocked probably due to bogon
lists.
Our ASN is is in AS block allocated by RIPE on 13 April 2006 then somebody can
have it
(All right then, scroll down for content :-))
On 1/4/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For those of us who read nanog from a mobile device, it's incredibly
> annoying to have no content in the first few bytes - a lot of mobile
> e-mail clients (all MS Windows Mobile 5 devices
On 4-jan-2007, at 14:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
all of Qatar appears on the net as a single IP address.
I wonder what they use the other 241663 addresses for.
To address the many machines and networks in Qatar.
The existence of a NAT gateway to one portion of the
Internet does not remov
> For those of us who read nanog from a mobile device, it's incredibly
> annoying to have no content in the first few bytes - a lot of mobile
> e-mail clients (all MS Windows Mobile 5 devices and every Blackberry
> I've seen) pull the first 0.5KB of each message, i.e. the header,
> subject line an
> > all of Qatar appears on the net as a single IP address.
>
> I wonder what they use the other 241663 addresses for.
Same as you.
To address the many machines and networks in Qatar.
The existence of a NAT gateway to one portion of the
Internet does not remove the need for registered IP
addres
Amar wrote:
> You forgot to mention that there was also IPv6
> connectivity ;-)
*grin* How many kilobit IPv6 traffic did we push, you know? :P
--
/ahnberg.
Mattias Ahnberg wrote:
We've been given a /16 each time so each visitor has had a fully public IP,
and the bandwidth has been provided by Telia the last couple of years. On
the hardware side we've both built it all with Extreme Networks equipment
and Cisco (and a mix of both).
You forgot to m
Gadi Evron wrote:
> 4. I do wish the talk on how CCC set up their multiple-uplink GigE network
>for the conference was filmed, I call this type of "create an ISP in 24
>hours", in a very very hostile and busy environment such as at
>defcon or CCC "extreme networking".
We do the same f
For those of us who read nanog from a mobile device, it's incredibly
annoying to have no content in the first few bytes - a lot of mobile
e-mail clients (all MS Windows Mobile 5 devices and every Blackberry
I've seen) pull the first 0.5KB of each message, i.e. the header,
subject line and the fir
40 matches
Mail list logo
