On 1/14/07, Gadi Evron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Your assumption is incorrect. These DNSBLs cover spam sent in email,
indeed. Thing is, spam is spam and spammers are spammers. Meaning, they
spam in every way they can.
How does this make his assumption incorrect? Spam is spam and DNSBLs
will
If you allow anonymous, unauthenticated access to any system it will
be abused. Auctions, blogs, chat, mail, phone, etc. IP addresses
have never been good authenticators for applications.
This is not true if you control the IP address space and the routers
around it.
I mention this merely b
The changes in network news have little to do with consumer
tendencies or entrenched content provider culture. News departments
have operated at a financial loss for many many years. The big
networks supported news as a service to the public, not as a
moneymaker. Furthermore, the internet h
At 09:50 a.m. 15/01/2007 -0500, Gian Constantine wrote:
The problem with this all (or mostly) VoD model is the entrenched culture.
In countries outside of the U.S. with smaller channel lineups, an all VoD
model might be easier to migrate to over time. In the U.S., where we have
200+ channel li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bora Akyol wrote:
>
> The question I asked earlier was, whether the last-mile SP networks
> can handle 24x7 100% link utilization for all of their customers. I
> don't think they can. And frankly, I don't know how they are going
> to get revenue from
Steve
That's mostly because the DVR boxes given by the cable companies (mine
is a Moto from Comcast)
are terrible. The UI just plain is unusable esp for on-demand portion of
the DVR guide.
I have caught up with the thread this morning and I have to say, I don't
understand why people think of vid
On 15 Jan 2007, at 00:43, Sean Donelan wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007, Tony Finch wrote:
I would expect the lists of compromised hosts to be fairly
effective -
open proxies of various kinds and perhaps botnet hosts. As for
SMTP the
blacklists would only be a starting point that either provid
The problem with this all (or mostly) VoD model is the entrenched
culture. In countries outside of the U.S. with smaller channel
lineups, an all VoD model might be easier to migrate to over time. In
the U.S., where we have 200+ channel lineups, consumers have become
accustomed to the massiv
On 15-Jan-2007, at 08:48, Michal Krsek wrote:
This system works perfectly in our linear-line distribution
(channels). As user you can choose time you want to see the show,
but not the show itself. Capacity on PVR device is finite and if
you don't want to waste the space with any broadcast
I am pretty sure we are not becoming a VoD world. Linear programming
is much better for advertisers. I do not think content providers, nor
consumers, would prefer a VoD only service. A handful of consumers
would love it, but many would not.
There are already cheap and efficient ways of doin
On 12 Jan 2007, at 15:26, Gian Constantine wrote:
I am pretty sure we are not becoming a VoD world. Linear
programming is much better for advertisers. I do not think content
providers, nor consumers, would prefer a VoD only service. A
handful of consumers would love it, but many would not
11 matches
Mail list logo
