-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Gristina wrote:
I have two racks in London UK. The colocation is
currently in London. The contract is up soon and most
of the feet on the ground in the UK of the company is
in the greater Birmingham area. So I'm interested in
colocating
No peering in Brum, quickest will be to bounce of London.
COLT has a data centre in Birmingham and we can do
what ever bandwidth you need to where ever.
Regards,
Neil.
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 12:56 -0800, Andrew Gristina wrote:
I have two racks in London UK. The colocation is
currently in London. The contract is up soon and most
of the feet on the ground in the UK of the company is
in the greater Birmingham area. So I'm interested in
colocating about two
Hey guys,
anyone have pointers for -48VDC powered analog modem units? Paradyne
and the like are no more. A -48VDC ATU-R might also be interesting,
although not preferred.
Best regards,
Christian
and hard to read...
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/osmhome/allochrt.pdf
adhoc allocation taken to it's limits?
We have a BOF slot in Toronto to discuss the general topic meeting
hosting, from the perspective of learning from past mistakes and
making the organisation of future events easier, and with the
additional goal of demystifying the process to those who might like
to host a meeting, but
On 1/30/2007 at 12:19 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IPv6 makes NAT obsolete because IPv6 firewalls can provide all
the useful features of IPv4 NAT without any of the downsides.
IPv6 firewalls? Where? Good ones?
Why good ones. NAT is a basic IPv4 firewall. All IPv6 needs to
Hi,
PIX/ASA Supports IPv6 Apparently, see below.
Don't know anyone who has tested it yet though ;-)
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_guide_
chapter09186a0080636f44.html
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
We will be running the keysigning sessions in Toronto during the
general session breaks (the breaks start sometime between 1000 and 1030
each day) in Hall F.
You may add your key to the keyring at:
http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?keyring=9342
Additional details
Lucy Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
and hard to read...
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/osmhome/allochrt.pdf
adhoc allocation taken to it's limits?
different frequencies of RF have different performance
characteristics. unlike ip addresses, a 1 mhz allocation at 180 mhz
and a 1 mhz allocation
I'm assisting in troulbeshooting an issue with a large client and I have a
quick question regarding the SBC Yahoo broadband service.
Thanks.
--
- tewks
I've updated the NANOG 39 page at cluepon.net with some information about
Toronto, and a large sports bar near the hotel for Super Bowl fans. I also
ask that anyone who is from or knows Toronto to please take a moment and add
something useful for our esteemed NANOG'ers.
Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
Checkpoint claims to have supported IPv6 since 2002:
http://www.checkpoint.com/press/2002/ipv6_081402.html
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
Juniper (ScreenOS 5.4) does it (http://tinyurl.com/yo9soq), Pix 7.0 does
it,
ack
___
Lucy E. Lynch | llynch @civil-tongue.net | llynch on jabber.org
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
Lucy Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
and hard to read...
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:43:52PM -0500, J. Oquendo wrote:
...
A lot of vendor information on this, etc. can be summarized over at
http://www.moonv6.org/ (or at least the hype of it)
...
This is why I asked: at some point last year, those guys said NO
firewalls were IPv6-ready yet.
--
Joseph S D Yao wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:43:52PM -0500, J. Oquendo wrote:
...
A lot of vendor information on this, etc. can be summarized over at
http://www.moonv6.org/ (or at least the hype of it)
...
This is why I asked: at some point last year, those guys said NO
firewalls
Hello all,
Being relatively new to the colocation business, we run into a fair number
of issues that we've never run into before. Got a new one today, and
although I can think of kludgey ways to accomplish what he wants, I'd
rather get some other ideas first...
We just had our first
We had that same problem and ended up doing it exactly as below, with
limited BGP announcements and policy routing all over. The customer also
demanded high-bandwidth at low cost, without regard to how good the actual
bandwidth was. It was, as you say, graceless.
Luckily we convinced them to
If you actually want to do this, you've got four choices:
- Policy route, as mentioned below.
- Get the customer their own connection to Cogent.
- Have a border router that only talks to Cogent and doesn't receive full
routes from your core, and connect the customer directly to that.
- Do
19 matches
Mail list logo
