I have to disagree. SWIP is not meaningless.
In my company some functions related to sending a SWIP are
automated, but my company has people on staff who know that
it is happening and what it means.
And I talk with plenty of other companies that fall into the
same boat.
In
[Apologies for duplicate emails]
Dear Colleages,
The IANA recently allocated the IPv4 address ranges 92/8 and 93/8 to
the RIPE NCC.
The following pingable addresses are now available in these blocks:
92.192.0.1
92.255.248.1
93.192.0.1
93.255.248.1
More information regarding the
FYI:
SURFnet has setup a 4 byte AS using Quagga and is currently announcing 2
prefixes originating from AS3.5
IPv4: 145.125.0.0/20 (Worldwide visible)
http://www.ris.ripe.net/cgi-bin/lg/index.cgi?rrc=RRC001query=12arg=%5C.5
IPv6: 2001:610:160::/48 (Only visible to the RIPE RIS project and
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 09:50:34PM +, Fergie wrote:
I would have to respectfully disagree with you. When network
operators do due diligence and SWIP their sub-allocations, they
(the sub-allocations) should be authoritative in regards to things
like RBLs.
After thinking it over: I
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 04:20:59PM -0500, Frank Bulk wrote:
Define network operator: the AS holder for that space or the operator of
that smaller-than-slash-24 sub-block? If the problem consistently comes
from /29 why not just leave the block in and be done with it?
Because
Comcast is known to emit lots of abuse -- are you blocking all their
networks today?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Frank Bulk
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 7:43 AM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 09:50:34PM +, Fergie
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 06:15:34PM -0500,
J. Oquendo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 24 lines which said:
was successfully configured by NASA Glenn Research Center to use
IPsec and IPv6 technologies in space.
Any human on board? Because he would have been able to access useful
HAHAHAHAHA I always knew that this stuff was the most prevalent and
billable content on the web, but I never thought of using it as a motivating
factor for chage!
Good one!
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Stephane Bortzmeyer
Because I haven't got unlimited WHOIS queries. (Although I
and everyone
else *should* have those. There are no valid reasons to
rate-limit any
form of WHOIS query.)
Yes there are. The current whois returns way more information on a query
than you need for network operations. That's
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 03:11:31PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Yes there are. The current whois returns way more information on a query
than you need for network operations. That's because the current whois
was designed back in the 1970's so that ARPANET network managers could
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 10:30:32AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I also find it curious that you claim to have people on staff at your
company who know what SWIP means. Perhaps you could ask them to share
that information with us since I have never seen this documented
anywhere. Do they
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 03:54:39PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 06:15:34PM -0500,
J. Oquendo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 24 lines which said:
was successfully configured by NASA Glenn Research Center to use
IPsec and IPv6 technologies in space.
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:56:57 +0200
Alex Le Heux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Apologies for duplicate emails]
Dear Colleages,
The IANA recently allocated the IPv4 address ranges 92/8 and 93/8 to
the RIPE NCC.
The following pingable addresses are now available in these blocks:
On Apr 10, 2007, at 11:13 AM, Joseph S D Yao wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 03:54:39PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 06:15:34PM -0500,
J. Oquendo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 24 lines which said:
was successfully configured by NASA Glenn Research Center
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 03:54:39PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
IPv6 has had operating system and router support for years.
I'd have to object with such a blanket statement.
I don't think you can say you support IPv6 (from an ISP's point of
view) without DHCPv6, since I don't think anyone
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
The only good thing I can say about this proposal is that 10GB is not
NEARLY enough to get your typical luser to think about changing their
configuration. Therefore, it probably won't have an impact on v6
adoption. (That ghod.)
Nor was it intended to. From what
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 12:10:59PM -0400, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
...
Second, who said v6 was the heights? ...
My, aren't we serious? Too serious to realize that satellites are a
little higher than I, at least, can reach.
--
Joe Yao
Analex Contractor
On Apr 10, 2007, at 1:24 PM, Joseph S D Yao wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 12:10:59PM -0400, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
...
Second, who said v6 was the heights? ...
My, aren't we serious? Too serious to realize that satellites are a
little higher than I, at least, can reach.
Guess I
Yes. Silly of you. I think you may have missed more than the singular
reference.
This back and forth has little to do with morality and more to do
with opinion.
Yet it begs, how moral is an argument of 'my opinion is superior to
your opinion'?
Such a lashing of another's opinion under
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also find it curious that you claim to have people on staff at your
company who know what SWIP means. Perhaps you could ask them to share
that information with us since I have never seen this documented
anywhere. Do they really know what you claim they know?
20 matches
Mail list logo
