Stephen Wilcox wrote:
Now, if you suddenly charge $2.50/mo to have a public IP or $15/mo for a /28 it
does become a consideration to the customer as to if they _REALLY_ need it
Where would this money go to?
Pete
Petri Helenius wrote:
Stephen Wilcox wrote:
Now, if you suddenly charge $2.50/mo to have a public IP or $15/mo for
a /28 it does become a consideration to the customer as to if they
_REALLY_ need it
Where would this money go to?
To ip-squatters.
Get your allocation now and turn it
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 10:50:10AM +0200, Peter Dambier wrote:
Petri Helenius wrote:
Stephen Wilcox wrote:
Now, if you suddenly charge $2.50/mo to have a public IP or $15/mo for
a /28 it does become a consideration to the customer as to if they
_REALLY_ need it
Where would
Stephen Wilcox wrote:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 10:50:10AM +0200, Peter Dambier wrote:
p2p people will be happy if they can get rid of their tunnels.
With rfc 1918 addresses for all there will be no more
filesharing, voip, spam and troyans.
really? because p2p doesnt work behind NAT, and
Hi,
The IANA IPv4 registry has been updated to reflect the allocation of
two /8 IPv4 blocks to the RIPE NCC in July 2007: 94/8 and 95/8. You
can find the IANA IPv4 registry at:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space
Please update your filters as appropriate.
Regards,
--
Leo
