On 27-Feb-2008, at 15:09, Mark Smith wrote:
Don't worry if the ISOC website times out, their firewall isn't TCP
ECN compatible.
Isn't it the case in the real world that the Internet isn't TCP ECN
compatible?
I thought people had relegated that to the nice idea but, in
practice, waste
On 28-Feb-2008, at 01:56, Paul Wall wrote:
UU/MFS tried running IP on the 'protect' path of their SONET rings
10 years ago. It didn't work then.
Well, it works so long as whoever was trying to troubleshoot the
circuits at 3am on US Thanksgiving understands that having the system
switch
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008, Joe Abley wrote:
On 28-Feb-2008, at 01:56, Paul Wall wrote:
UU/MFS tried running IP on the 'protect' path of their SONET rings
10 years ago. It didn't work then.
Well, it works so long as whoever was trying to troubleshoot the
circuits at 3am on US
On 28-Feb-2008, at 09:26, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Then you probably haven't been on the ass end of a continental fibre
link
drop. That actually mattered.
If both sides of your SONET ring drop, then surely you're as dead in
the water as you would be if each side of the ring was being used as
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008, Joe Abley wrote:
On 28-Feb-2008, at 09:26, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Then you probably haven't been on the ass end of a continental fibre
link
drop. That actually mattered.
If both sides of your SONET ring drop, then surely you're as dead in
the water as you would
Thus spake Owen DeLong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Feb 24, 2008, at 12:45 PM, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
The wording of the question and response referred only to ARIN
members. That does not include most orgs with _only_ legacy
allocations, but it would include orgs with both legacy and non- legacy
Hi Everyone,
Just received a light-up of calls about general connectivity, a call
to AboveNet got us the answer that they are having global routing
issues.
Has anyone received any more details?
--
Ross Vandegrift
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The good Christian should beware of mathematicians, and all
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Ross Vandegrift [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Just received a light-up of calls about general connectivity, a call
to AboveNet got us the answer that they are having global routing
issues.
Has anyone received any more details?
Seeing issues here
Got this off another list.
AboveNet is experiencing a network event.
Event Date Time:
18:00 UTC, 28 Feb 2008
Event Description:
AboveNet is experiencing routing instability in it's global IP backbone.
Customers may be experiencing increased latency and packet loss during
this event.
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:41:27 -0500
Joe Abley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 27-Feb-2008, at 15:09, Mark Smith wrote:
Don't worry if the ISOC website times out, their firewall isn't TCP
ECN compatible.
Isn't it the case in the real world that the Internet isn't TCP ECN
compatible?
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone knew of server hotel locations in Sweden or
Greece.
More generally, if there is a good resource for me to look this up
myself next time.
Thanks in advance,
Travis
--
URL:https://www.subspacefield.org/~travis/
Q: Who Would Jesus Waterboard? A: Matthew 5:38-42
For
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 12:58 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More generally, if there is a good resource for me to look this up
myself next time.
www.datacentermap.com
www.peeringdb.com (where there are exchanges, there is conditioned
space not too far away)
On Feb 28, 2008, at 3:58 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone knew of server hotel locations in Sweden
I would recommend Netnod in Sweden. Kurtis Lindqvist is a good
contact there.
Regards
Marshall
or
Greece.
More generally, if there is a good resource for me
I'm seeing everything from Hughes Network (my vsat) go to Portland,
Maine, from Northern Virginia, by way of Nashville, Las Vegas, Los
Angeles (Verizon), and then back to Boston (Alter), for 20 hops. The
usual is 10, straight up the eastern seaboard.
Lots of delay, and more bad dns than
Isn't it the case in the real world that the Internet isn't TCP ECN
compatible?
actually, no. ecn compat is increasing, happy to say.
Randy Bush wrote:
Isn't it the case in the real world that the Internet isn't TCP ECN
compatible?
actually, no. ecn compat is increasing, happy to say.
Hopefully the number of people with 8 year old pix firewall software is
not...
Anyone aware if this is causing any bleedover to Sprint? Seeing massive delays
(~280+ ms) and drops between Relay, MD (144.232.15.2) and San Jose
(144.232.8.145).
Also seeing same from fort worth (144.232.9.192) to ana (144.232.20.64).
Cisco.com is a good destination to try.
On Thu, 28 Feb
On Feb 28, 2008, at 4:29 PM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
On Feb 28, 2008, at 3:58 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering if anyone knew of server hotel locations in Sweden
I would recommend Netnod in Sweden. Kurtis Lindqvist is a good
contact there.
NetNod is a secure IX in Sweden,
18 matches
Mail list logo
