Re: default routes question or any way to do the redundant

as a friend who reads this list but clearly wants to remain anonymous pointed out randy

Re: default routes question or any way to do the rebundant

On Fri, Mar 21, 2008, Sena, Rich wrote: > Can someone put this in a digest for me? I will, once the shit settles. Adrian > > - Original Message - > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Barry Shein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: nanog@merit.edu > Sent: Fri Mar 21 16:44:39 2

Re: default routes question or any way to do the rebundant

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > And more to the point - if somebody manages to go through all the hoops > needed to ask a basic question on the NANOG list, it demonstrates a > desire to accumulate clue - so we should encourage those people. ... yes, please. (i've not given up on accumulating clue

RE: I'm going to stay on the NANOG list anyway

Thanks for letting us know that we should update our kill files. Al -Original Message- From: James R. Cutler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: March 21, 2008 4:39 PM To: ?NANOG? Operators Group 3F_Operators_Group_ Subject: I'm going to stay on the NANOG list anyway Whoops! I'm still coming t

Re: default routes question or any way to do the rebundant

At 04:20 AM 21/3/08, ann kok wrote: ls it possible to have 2 default routes? or how can I do the rebundant when the route is still working either eth1 or eth2 down? A google search for turns up lots of hints (mine included). There are some variations using lo0 so that the route is always ava

Re: default routes question or any way to do the rebundant

Can someone put this in a digest for me? - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Barry Shein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: nanog@merit.edu Sent: Fri Mar 21 16:44:39 2008 Subject: Re: default routes question or any way to do the rebundant On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 4

Re: default routes question or any way to do the rebundant

On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 5:59 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's cute Valdis, but did the little girl and Einstein force thousands of > people around the world to read their correspondence? Suggestion: Before creating list rule about appropriate level of expertise in questions, wait unti

RE: default routes question or any way to do the rebundant

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:15:06 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > >> mailing list. Isn't this akin to posting to a profesional >> mathematics forum asking for help with your Algebra? > > In 1943 he (Einstein) answered a little girl who had difficulties in > school with math

Re: NXDOMAIN data needed for survey

> > I think it's best that we let David Ulevitch and the crew @ OpenDNS make > the money that is to be made off this. He's doing good while doing well. Why shouldn't anyone be able to "make the money"? The problem with that post wasn't that he was advocating law breaking, it was that it's a mar

AS7018 (ATT) bgp contact needed

Could someone from AS7018 (AT&T) please contact me about a route you are originating that is hijacking/blackholing traffic? The route is: 66.235.248.0/22 - Kevin

Re: default routes question or any way to do the rebundant

On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:15:06 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > mailing list. Isn't this akin to posting to a profesional mathematics forum > asking for help with your Algebra? In 1943 he (Einstein) answered a little girl who had difficulties in school with mathematics. "Do not worry about your diff

I'm going to stay on the NANOG list anyway

Whoops! I'm still coming to grips with multihoming. According to your thinking, my many years on the NANOG mailing list were wrong and you tell me I should leave. I don't think I can allow you to do that, Andrew. Paul Vixie, Dillon, Bush, and others have given many examples of appropriat

Re: default routes question or any way to do the rebundant

I'll take that bet Valdis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:44:39 EDT, Martin Hannigan said: I dont think that there's any issue at all to be honest. NANOG isn't just for the clued. And more to the point - if somebody manages to go through all the hoops needed to a

Re: default routes question or any way to do the rebundant

On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:44:39 EDT, Martin Hannigan said: > > > I dont think that there's any issue at all to be honest. NANOG isn't > just for the clued. > > And more to the point - if somebody manages to go through all the hoops needed to ask a basic question on the NANOG list, it demonstrate

RE: default routes question or any way to do the rebundant

Scott McGrath wrote: > If we do not help the newbies how will they ever become clued. I can > certainly remember when I did not know a bit from a byte. I agree, but I question if NANOG is the appropriate medium for such help. I tend to (maybe mistakenly) assume a working knowledge of basic mul

Re: default routes question or any way to do the rebundant

If we do not help the newbies how will they ever become clued. I can certainly remember when I did not know a bit from a byte. Oh and btw I'll take 5 of those STM64's on special... Regards all - Scott Martin Hannigan wrote: On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Barry Shein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: default routes question or any way to do the rebundant

On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Barry Shein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Is this for real? > > Someone asks a harmless question about setting up multiple default > routes, not about Barack Obama or whether the moon is made of green > cheese, but about default routes. > > Then 10 people d

Re: default routes question or any way to do the rebundant

Is this for real? Someone asks a harmless question about setting up multiple default routes, not about Barack Obama or whether the moon is made of green cheese, but about default routes. Then 10 people decide to respond that this isn't appropriate for nanog. Then 25 people decide to dispute th

Re: NXDOMAIN data needed for survey

On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 10:45:30AM -0700, Tomas L. Byrnes wrote: > BTW: If someone legitimate needs NXDOMAIN data, I do have a bunch. If anyone else is interesting in a concerted effort to provide falsified data, I'm interested in helping and hosting. -- Ross Vandegrift [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Th

The Cidr Report

This report has been generated at Fri Mar 21 21:14:42 2008 AEST. The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table. Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report. Recent Table History Date

BGP Update Report

BGP Update Report Interval: 18-Feb-08 -to- 20-Mar-08 (32 days) Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS2.0 TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name 1 - AS9498 115119 2.0% 91.8 -- BBIL-AP BHARTI BT INTERNET LTD. 2 - AS24731 66934