nd. Never had experience with ARIN, nor its methods or templates
(only RIPE experience).
Took 5 weeks to get a /19 and then an additional 4 weeks to get the
ASN. YMMV.
-Hank Nussbacher
http://www.interall.co.il
--
Alain Hebert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
r with the discussion who spoke on condition of anonymity.
[snip]
More here:
http://news.com.com/2100-1028_3-6077654.html
Cheers,
- ferg
--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ferg's tech blog: http:/
s is why I stated that globally
the state/city should be pretty low (50%).
That good that you have 75% to 85% but I wasn't ignoring the AOL's
in my statement.
That's all.
(FYI: The NTP Issue has been resolved (;-} )
Kevin Day wrote:
On May 15, 2006, at 4:
basing your conclusions on your own lack of imagination.
DS
--
Alain Hebert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PubNIX Inc.
P.O. Box 175 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 5T7
tel 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.netfax 514-990-9443
Brian Wallingford wrote:
I'm not quite comfortable with the idea of building a market audience
based on data with at best dubious accuracy.
On Mon, 15 May 2006, Martin Hannigan wrote:
:At 12:49 PM 5/15/2006, Brian Wallingford wrote:
:
:> scam_snake_oil_etc
:
:
:How so?
--
GeoIP - http://www.maxmind.com/geoip/
Ashe Canvar wrote:
Hi all,
Can any of you please recommend some IP-to-geo mapping database / web
service ?
I would like to get resolution down to city if possible.
Thanks and Regards,
-ashe
--
Alain Hebert[EMAIL
pornography ? on what basis? what religion ? what culture?
regards.
Alain Hebert wrote:
Why?
If we can coral them in it and legislate to have no porn anywhere
else than on .xxx ... should fix the issue for the prudes out there.
william(at)elan.net wrote:
http://www.icann.org
ternet Responsibility - http://www.pfir.org
Co-Founder, IOIC
- International Open Internet Coalition - http://www.ioic.net
Moderator, PRIVACY Forum - http://www.vortex.com
Member, ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy
Lauren's Blog: http://lauren.vortex.com
DayThink: http://daythink.vor
of luck. I am trying to get a 10x10 cage in New Jersey (Jersey City area) but it seems everybody is at capacity. What happened?
--
Alain Hebert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PubNIX Inc.
P.O. Box 175 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 5T7
tel 514-990-5911
filtering by
blocking ASN's or IP prefixes. It is a variation of Net Neutrality,
just by a different name.
Except Network Neutrality is about QoS, not filtering.
[snip]
--
Alain Hebert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PubNIX Inc.
P.O. Box 175
Steve Sobol wrote:
Alain Hebert wrote:
With the way you named your address book (North American Noise and
Off-topic Gripes).
We now know where to fill your futur comments.
(In the killfile that is)
You don't seem to want to act very responsibly, based on your comments
hink that refusing to take reasonable action
to mitigate the damages because you feel the other party is "at fault" and
should be 100% responsible is probably a good way to hurt any kind of case
you might actually have against them too.
Yeap x packets/sec times million
Steve Sobol wrote:
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Alain Hebert wrote:
Because its DIX ressources... They can do whatever they want with it.
They owe nothing to DLink customers, and DLink customers should
know to buy equipments from a better company that do not trespasses on
FYI: a couple of update at http://people.freebsd.org/~phk/dlink/
I've summited a suggestion for a story to Wired... We'll see.
--
Alain Hebert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PubNIX Inc.
P.O. Box 175 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 5T7
tel 51
the right media
(blog/Wired/Computer Show) this could be solved quite rapidely.
Have fun...
--
Alain Hebert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PubNIX Inc.
P.O. Box 175 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 5T7
tel 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.netfax 514-990-9443
ared by lawyer and the other have enought intestinal
fortitude to put them in there place.
(At the bottom of the sea hopefully)
--
Alain Hebert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PubNIX Inc.
P.O. Box 175 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 5T7
tel 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.netfax 514-990-9443
Joseph S D Yao wrote:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 02:04:39AM -0400, Alain Hebert wrote:
Paul Vixie wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Simon Lyall) writes:
I've said in other forums the only solution for this sort of software is
to return the wrong time (by several months). The
Now if we can get this letter into Wired...
--
Alain Hebert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PubNIX Inc.
P.O. Box 175 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 5T7
tel 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.netfax 514-990-9443
e HA stuff and I don't see any of
the redundancy knobs in this version of the OS.
--
Alain Hebert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PubNIX Inc.
P.O. Box 175 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 5T7
tel 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.netfax 514-990-9443
ht be more effective if it
targeted, oh, www.dlink.com instead of an IP address.
Then at least it would not be taking up internal DIX bandwidth capacity.
By no means am I encouraging legally actionable activity, however, and
as noted, (b) just might be.
--
Alain H
Just switch but 2 (of more) of them makes for a good frontend to a farm
of squid.
With both incoming and outgoing resilience.
Joseph S D Yao wrote:
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 04:41:26PM -0400, Alain Hebert wrote:
Hummm squid.
With a touch of haproxy... (Or for those with money
.)
The aforementioned Blue Coat Proxy server.
--
Alain Hebert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PubNIX Inc.
P.O. Box 175 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 5T7
tel 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.netfax 514-990-9443
Randy Bush wrote:
Gadi Evron wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(time to go put on my fireproof jammies)
or your .procmailrc
randy
/usr/local/etc/procmailrc in my case. ( but not in production (; )
--
Alain Hebert[EMAIL PROTECTED
dmail servers globally.
--
Alain Hebert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PubNIX Inc.
P.O. Box 175 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 5T7
tel 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.netfax 514-990-9443
ility/redundancy.
Suggestions off list would be wonderful.
Thanks.
--
Alain Hebert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PubNIX Inc.
P.O. Box 175 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 5T7
tel 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.netfax 514-990-9443
In summary for now:
The situation is pretty much statu-quo.
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
On 2/10/06, Alain Hebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For APNIC, we also includes all their peers up-to (if possible) to a
ARIN one. But we only do that on extreme case of network flooding.
(
tupidity is a planet wide illness. (;
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
On 2/10/06, Alain Hebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That new bunch of spam is hard to tag on digest alone... And I dont
believe in regexing the content to see if a url is listed (too many
false positive).
T
t new bunch of spam is hard to tag on digest alone... And I dont
believe in regexing the content to see if a url is listed (too many
false positive).
--
Alain Hebert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PubNIX Inc.
P.O. Box 175 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 5T7
te
0Mbps. A Gig-E rated straight through, in conjunction
with the automatic crossover feature, was necessary to get to GigE.
A lot of cross over cables only cross pairs 1-2 with 3-6, leaving 4-5,
and 7-8 as straight through. Gig-E uses all four pair.
--
Alain Hebert
ale ISP's.0(Dont have time today to compile
it... Will see in the future)
For the other still commenting on my initial comment -> I didnt'
said full on spam...
Christian Kuhtz wrote:
On Feb 2, 2006, at 3:34 PM, Alain Hebert wrote:
I fail to see a usage for smaller IS
ave fun...
Randy Bush wrote:
I'm I alone to find this a bit spammy?
announcement of a free, open-source, and looking very useful tool
for operators looks like one of the most important messages i have
read on these lists this week.
randy
--
Alain Hebert
hat C-BGP could be very useful for ISPs willing to
optimise the distribution and the selection of the BGP routes in their
network. Comments, suggestions and questions from network operators
are more than welcome.
Best regards,
Bruno Quoitin, Sebastien Tandel and Olivier Bonaventure
--
Ala
since about 1900 UTC today. Using web site to do lookups
also fails or is VERY slow.
Anyone know what is going on here?
THANKS!
Jon Kibler
We have had to do the same was slowing down a bunch of mail.
--
Alain Hebert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PubNIX Inc.
P.O
oking for opertional instructions about clamav, broken
config, etc. But if anybody else noticed a volume reduction also?
And I'm curious to find out which network finally got fixed...
Thanks and have a good year.
--
Alain Hebert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ng it happen.
Remember to keep the names of the tech/admin you've talk too.
Worked for us...
Also
4. ARIN could re-assign the subnet to a new AS, they where very
eager too help but we didn't need to do it.
Have fun...
Alain Hebert wrote:
Hi,
A. Yeap we got
nounced in
his origial form.
Have fun...
Blaine Christian wrote:
J
On Nov 16, 2005, at 12:15 AM, Alain Hebert wrote:
Thanks.
( There is more interesting details but I will reserve myself. (; )
We're already working on making contact with the upstreams, but
you're
11:46:35PM -0500, Alain Hebert wrote:
Hi,
I know somebody that is experiencing route flapping for more than a
day now and we found out 10h ago that it was due to the announcement of
his subnet by a major TelCO.
Once that telco contacted, we got the run around for 10h now and no
willin
Hi,
I know somebody that is experiencing route flapping for more than a
day now and we found out 10h ago that it was due to the announcement of
his subnet by a major TelCO.
Once that telco contacted, we got the run around for 10h now and no
willingness from their part to fix the pr
38 matches
Mail list logo
