On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Vivien M. wrote:
> You must be talking about a different Netreg system that the one everyone
> else has used. The one we're talking about involves you logging in when you
> connect with an unknown MAC - once you've used the system to match your MAC
> to your student number/lo
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, John Kristoff wrote:
> There are certain environments where it would be nice for people to have
> spent some time. Working at a university would be one good experience for
> many people, particularly in this field, to have had.
I fully agree...This is the one environment wh
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Andrew Dorsett [3/15/2004 9:52 AM] :
>
> > Well whats wrong with you setting up a small router and using one IP? The
> > crap I hear most of the time is that they want to only issue one ip per
>
> Nothing particular
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, David A. Ulevitch wrote:
> Has it been a while since you've been on a resnet? They're bad, but most
> all "ResNet's" I know of are now implementing some sort of MAC/DHCP combo
> at the very least.
The thing to remember is that all rooms are locked until someone is issued
a
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> And what is wrong with setting up a hub or something in a dormroom? I
> find it quite convenient to leave both my PC and a laptop running on my
> desk, for various reasons (too many open terminals and windows is one of
> them ...)
Well whats
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Vivien M. wrote:
> credibly argue "But I never read this AUP". The web-based DHCP registration
> system prevents that.
Ok, I'll give that one to you. :) Got me there hehehe Though now we are
making the AUP a part of the freshman orientation session so there are no
excuses.
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Sean Donelan wrote:
> line, then the question becomes should you be able to send mail
> directly from your home server with a static IP address on a DSL line
> until abused? No need to buy another box, find a colo or figure out
> how to remotely administer another system or
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Sean Donelan wrote:
> I think the actual requirement is for a long-term end-to-end identifier
> for systems, and maybe even network users, before they can do certain
> activities on the network so you can trace or block the system. Systems
Now my question becomesIs this
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Rob Nelson wrote:
> On the other hand, if the person doesn't have a UPS at home, what good is
> when their SMTP server in a colo is still chugging? :)
Just because my power is out at home doesn't mean I don't have net access.
With the colo server collecting mail you can SSH
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> One suggestion I haven't seen yet: simply complain. Your cellular
> service provider may install a new base station in the area if enough
This is very true and sometimes it works. Even for the small customers.
I had a problem with Nextel that r
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm sure a lot of people have the same problem as we are having... Our NOC
> and Server Equipment is located in "No Cell Phone signal" zone of our
> building (It's amazing what metal walls, Server Racks and HVAC Systems
> will do to Cellphone Signals
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Majdi S. Abbas wrote:
> On the other hand, if you have the need for this kind of
> single stream performance, and the pipe to yourself, why not
> devise your own protocol with less overhead?
Because then you'll violate the rules of the contest. :)
http://lsr.internet2.
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
> wouldn't dns lookups be a bit time consuming and introduce a dos on the
> dos ?? if you had to look up each time you crafted a packet it'd take alot
> more effort to pound out 100kpps, no? Most of the flooders I've seen (I'm
> no programmer so I
> Andrew Dorsett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hey everyone, I know this is slightly off topic but I'm hoping that someone
> from Verisign or the like will respond. I am looking for a VERY secure
> computer cabinet to replace an open rack I have now. I'm looking
Hey everyone, I know this is slightly off topic but I'm hoping that someone
from Verisign or the like will respond. I am looking for a VERY secure
computer cabinet to replace an open rack I have now. I'm looking for almost
vault like qualities. Is anyone willing to make recommendations on
On Wed, 22 May 2002, Brian wrote:
> I see ucsd extension offers a communication engineering cert, which altho
> a cert is not vendor specific. Seems to deal with typical hi level EE
> stuff, and offers a shot to get into their masters program.
Exactly! It is high level EE stuff. That's n
On Wed, 22 May 2002, Kristian P. Jackson wrote:
> running around acting like network engineers, just as a bunch of network
> engineers are no more qualified to program. Perhaps a bachelors in network
> engineering is in order?
EXACTLY my conceptSo why can't we find some university and devel
On Wed, 22 May 2002, Nigel Clarke wrote:
> What do you think is more respected, a masters degree in
> Networking Engineering or a CCIE. In most
One of my arguments is that this doesn't exist but at a FEW schools
around the world and only at the MS level. I've been looking for a
network enginee
On Wed, 22 May 2002, Scott Granados wrote:
> the other hand I can think of some good reasons why someone might not
> have a degree but still be totally qualified.
*jumping on my soap box*
I have to say that the idea of requiring a degree for the IT industry is
obsurd. Sure it is an easy way to
19 matches
Mail list logo
