hu, 12 May 2005 04:15:07 -1000, Brian Russo said:
Is there now justification for allowing transit for ms-sql slammer ports?
That depends. Do you believe in end-to-end or walled-garden?
--
Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(808) 277 8623
Perhaps a better question is:
Is there now justification for allowing transit for ms-sql slammer ports?
- bri
Joe Maimon wrote:
Is there still justification for denying transit for ms-sql slammer
ports?
Thanks,
Joe
--
Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(808) 277 8623
t comparable, this is a different industry and different
market. Also bandwidth is not a pure commodity, and DSL is not pure
bandwidth.
I think your argument is at best uninformed, at worst
non-existent.. you
need to provide some references, examples, figures,
whatever.. else this is
little more than trolling.
Steve
--
Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(808) 277 8623
olks don't want broadband. You don't need
4mb down to read
your email. And once you get outside of the city limits there's a good sized market that can't get any type of broadband,
especially cable.
We may decline some, but I don't think that ISP's are going away anytime soon.
Bob Martin
--
Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(808) 277 8623
Can someone with verizon mail/postmaster group get in touch with me.
thanks,
- bri
--
Recursivity. Call back if it happens again.
Cheers to everyone who mailed me, apparently was a pccwbtn and/or
alter.net issue. Now resolved.
thanks,
- bri
At Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 05:56:04PM -0400, Brian Russo wrote:
>
> Is anyone else having problems accessing 128.171.* (hawaii.edu)
>
> - bri
>
> --
> Recursi
Is anyone else having problems accessing 128.171.* (hawaii.edu)
- bri
--
Recursivity. Call back if it happens again.
At Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 11:22:17PM +1000, Gregh wrote:
> I would love to know the average age of the list inhabitants.
22
>
> It has been my observation that things which are new become better known
> when a generation has grown up, completely, with it and is teaching the next
> generation.
>
At Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 08:22:48AM -0400, Chris Brenton wrote:
>
> Agreed. I think part of what makes 0-day easier to hide *is* the raw
> quantity of preventable exploits that are taking place. In many ways we
> have become numb to compromises so that the first response ends up being
> "format and
At Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 06:12:16AM -0400, Chris Brenton wrote:
>
> Key word here is "essentially". I've been involved with about a half
> dozen compromises that have been true zero days. Granted that's less
> than ground noise compared to what we are seeing today.
There're a lot more 0-days than
10 matches
Mail list logo
