On 10/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a network
operations thing... why should Comcast provide a fat pipe for
the rest of the world to benefit from? Just my $.02.
Because their customers PAY them to provide that fat pipe?
You are correct, customers pay Comcast to
On 11/5/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are AS35985 and provide transit for AS36845. Currently, AS7018 is
able to route to us (AS35985), but not our customer (AS36845). I have
checked every looking glass and traceroute site I can think of. Every
network I have tried has a
5. ATT (at least when I've dealt with them in their datacenters) does not
support BGP community strings for null routing (or any strings for that
matter :) Think about that for a second. To stop an attack Register.com
would need to call ATT and request a filter/null route. Since ATT
operations
On 4/27/06, John van Oppen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody have a list of communities that the old AS7911 accepts from
customers? I can't find their guide anywhere and nobody at level3
seems to have it.
I really need to keep traffic from a couple of ASes away from them if
possible
!
http://www.readytechs.com/filterpro
===
Charles Gucker wrote:
On 4/27/06, John van Oppen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody have a list of communities that the old AS7911 accepts from
customers? I can't find their guide anywhere
On 4/7/06, Alexander Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 7 April 2006 07:03:09 -0400, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Can you give us some examples so us dumb Americans can more
precisely explain the problem? :)
When a random customer (content hoster) asks you to accept
something out of 8/8
Much of the negatives is from jaded competitors who don't
want to fairly compete. Other than that, the answer is 'it depends'.
Depends on if you like to do traffic engineering; Cogent's
BGP community support, consisting of a whole three things you
can set (two if you only have a single
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 12:10:35PM -0500, Omachonu Ogali wrote:
I have the need to de-pref my routes to Level3, to be of equal value as the
routes they receive from their peers, but they don't offer a community for
that. But wow, I can see that this route originated from Tustin, CA!
Hrm, this
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 11:46:35PM -0500, Alain Hebert wrote:
Hi,
I know somebody that is experiencing route flapping for more than a
day now and we found out 10h ago that it was due to the announcement of
his subnet by a major TelCO.
Once that telco contacted, we got the
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 02:53:02AM -0600, Lewis Butler wrote:
On 05 Oct 2005, at 13:44 , Charles Gucker wrote:
Oh man, I have to jump in here for a moment. Not that I agree with
what happened, but to refute your claim that Cogent can get L3
elsewhere, it goes both ways. L3 can also get
On 07 Oct 2005 19:00:46 +, Paul Vixie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Charles Gucker) writes:
Ok, as I understand it, Level3 can get Cogent connectivity back
simply be restoring the peering that they suspended, right?
First off, that's not my quote. ;-) Second
On 10/5/05, Daniel Roesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 02:08:01PM -0400, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
You can only be a tier 1 and maintain global reachability if you peer
with every other tier 1. Level 3 is obviously the real thing, and Cogent
is close enough (at
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 03:37:08PM -0700, Matt Bazan wrote:
a) the quote was in fact from a particular company (sure, it may look
darn similar - but prove? and if you're really worried, fudge some
details a bit)
- sure, if it's a $10 million quote that's one thing. But say a
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 08:06:09PM -0400, David Hubbard wrote:
Hi all, I'd appreciate any on or offlist emails
with the names of larger providers that allow
you, through communities, to do prepending of
your AS path to selected remote AS's. We use two
providers that allow this since we use
14 matches
Mail list logo
