On 6/17/06, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The problem I see is that this technology will be used (literally,
not ideally) solely for harassment (especially via IRC). I do not
see any other practical use for this technology other than that.
The whole "right to privacy/anonymity" arg
On 4/13/06, Gregory Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From the BBC "Daily news", Technology section:
>
> * Net clocks suffering data deluge *
> Home hardware maker D-Link has been accused of denting the net's
> ability to tell the time accurately.
> Full story:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/em/-
On 4/12/06, Steve Sobol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> > By the way, since we're talking about D-Link, it's instructive to read the
> > warnings on their firmware update pages.
> >
> > Do NOT upgrade firmware on any D-Link product over a wireles
On 3/1/06, Nicole Harrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> In short, how much information do you pass on to support yourself and when.
We've found that a simple "we've received complaints about you and
your machine. Go here (symantec, fsecure, windowsupdate, etc) and
patch your machine." wor
On 7/21/05, Joseph S D Yao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 04:32:09PM -0700, Rick Wesson wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > I've developed a tool to pull together a bunch of information from
> > DNSRBLs and mix it with a BGP feed, the result is that upon request I
> > can generate a
On 5/31/05, Owen DeLong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not having received one, I have no gag order, so, I am free to tell you I
> haven't received one.
>
> Owen
This assumes that the new breed of NSL doesn't require you to deny
having received an NSL when questioned, unless you want to have some
On 4/14/05, Matthew Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This reminds me of the way others behaved when I entered the field
> some 25 years ago. Some people were very helpful and friendly.
> Others responded very arrogantly with the tone of "how stupid you
> are for asking that question."
I didn't
On Apr 8, 2005 4:55 PM, Vicky Rode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://software.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=05/04/06/197203&from=rss
>
> Just wondering how many have transitioned to djbdns from bind and if so
> any feedback.
>
> regards,
> /vicky
I used to use djbdns on my laptop for testin
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:29:09 -0600, Kathryn Kessey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seems like a more rational answer to Utah's pr0n phobia is for a certain
> religious entity to publish their own net-nanny software/service for their
> parishioners.
Call the filtering program "SCOwl"...
--
GDB ha
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 21:14:12 -0800, James Laszko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
> Why more people don't use resources like what Cymru offer is beyond
> me...
Not-Invented-Here syndrome?
--
GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 20:24:15 +0200 (EET), Pekka Savola
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> This seems to imply several things:
> >> - when having lots of sites, you typically want to obtain local
> >>Internet connectivity, because transporti
11 matches
Mail list logo
