Seems like cogent has been having issues this morning. I'm seeing high
latency all over the place.
Anyone has any idea what's going on?
-chris
forget it, the issue is related to issues with a transit provider.
*shrug*
-chris
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Christian Malo wrote:
Seems like cogent has been having issues this morning. I'm seeing high
latency all over the place.
Anyone has any idea what's going on?
-chris
FREE RICHARD
-chris
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Husan Sarris wrote:
NANOG,
It is with great sadness that I inform you that Richard Steenbergen,
long-time NANOG contributor and colleague, has been censored by Dr.
Harris this morning. Richard will be barred from posting to this list
until such
since when nanog-l turned into gmailswaps.com ?
come on already.
-chris
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Steven S. wrote:
And with that they're gone. Your welcome to everyone I got (I'm in the
process of sending them out as we speak).
probably not as much as shittynetwireless.net
-chris
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Bubba Parker wrote:
Maybe because efnet sucks? :) *runs*
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 11:07:40AM -0400, Matthew McGehrin wrote:
Why would you need to re-invent the wheel?
There are multiple EFNET servers run by
I'm sure Susan will make sure to revoke his posting rights.
-chris
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 12:44:50PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay... Here is a new one for me. Got a call from my dad saying he left
his PC on last night connected
no need to email your resume ...
-chris
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Krichbaum, Eric wrote:
They went to a loose configuration to get the Isat (most of our sat
users) back to an operational state. The Isat vendor is now testing a
tunneled version.
Eric Krichbaum, Chief Engineer
MCSE: NT4,
procket ? :)
-chris
On Tue, 25 May 2004, Tony Li wrote:
Well, that's pretty impressive. Since you're not using Juniper or
Cisco, whose
gear are you using?
Tony
On May 25, 2004, at 12:58 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
So you never run any production code that was compiled with gcc?
bill, mind to not use NANOG as your own yellow pages ?
-chris
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, william(at)elan.net wrote:
If there is somebody from Cisco on this list who has been accessing
completewhois port 43 whois service with thousands of consequitive queries
for last few days (or possibly
It was down, came back up.
It's certainly not a networking problem so saying it's down from a couple
hosts doesn't matter.
that's it that's all, no need to tell everybody it was down for you.
-chris
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Forrest Houston wrote:
Back for me now too. I was seeing the error
May I add that a lot of NANOG people actually use IRC for many reasons.
You would be suprised to learn how many of the people posting to NANOG
chat on a daily basis in a certain #nanog channel. Would you be pissed to
know that I'm an IRCer and I also own NANOG.NET ?
ohh and also, #nanog has
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
Tony Tauber wrote:
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 01:36:27PM -0400, Derek Samford wrote:
Shane,
There is a practice on that (At least here.).
Generally we provide a
I heard that UU.net is rolling Outlook at the core ...
-chris
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Jeff Harper wrote:
Anyone think this is related the Klez virus?
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Steve Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 10:58 AM
To: Streiner,
13 matches
Mail list logo
