DNS forward all queries and replies to myspace, Im sure they'll enjoy that!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Vixie
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 3:48 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: what the heck do i do now?
> > ... the eff
Tell them that you have absolutely no interest in doing business with their
company now and in the future and that any future calls will be considered
harassment. If that doesn't work, explain to them that they have an
inferior product to that of their competitors and that you are more likely
to
Can somebody explain to me why I keep getting e-mails with no content that are setting
off my virus scanners via NANOG list?
PIX firewalls are great if you configure them correctly for the application. 40 or
less servers may not require something as complex, however if the data you are
protecting is super-critical, I think a PIX might be your best solution.
Proxy firewalls (i.e. Linux, BSD or variant gateways) are g
o the complexity.
>It still holds that, generally speaking, if you can route instead of
>bridging, it's a better option.
>
>On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 01:36:48PM -0600, Gregory Taylor wrote:
>>
>> I have a question and would like all of your opinions on this ma
I have a question and would like all of your opinions on this matter, as I research
heavily into stateful ethernet bridging, packet mangling and their advantages and
disadvantages to local and wide area network topologies.
Deployed in large volumes, what negative effects, if any, would ethernet
--
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 14:37:38 -0800
>
>Greg,
>
>Let me spell it out crystal clear so you can understand. Are you, or
>are you not, the Gregory
>Taylor referenced in the URL's I sent below?
>
>Albert P.
>(signing his real name
and infinite wisdom in the past few days, including
>Gregory Taylor. I
>can't help but wonder if this is the same who launched multi-gigabit
>DDoS attacks against
>IRC servers and major ISP's recently:
>
>http://www.geocities.com/osek_owned/
>http://www.urbandi
e:
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 3:55 PM
To: Rachael Treu
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Counter DoS
Yes, lets allow the kiddies who already get away with as little work as
they can in order to produce the most de
Yes, lets allow the kiddies who already get away with as little work as
they can in order to produce the most destruction they can, the ability
to use these 'Security Systems' as a new tool for DoS attacks against
their enemies.
Scenerio:
Lets say my name is: l33th4x0r
I want to attack joe
Mutli-homing a non-ISP network or system on multiple carriers is a good
way to maintain independent links to the internet by means of different
peering, uplinks, over-all routing and reliability. My network on NAIS
is currently multi-homed through AT&T. I use a single provider as both
of my r
My mom likes the idea, she thinks it'll help her get her hotmail faster.
(shrugs)
Brian Bruns wrote:
On Thursday, March 11, 2004 3:05 AM [EST], Brian Bruns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Sounds like efnet channel wars on a much more interesting scale.
Like I've said in previous posts - do we rea
viders to their knees.
(Popcorn's in the microwave as I speak)
Greg
Jay Hennigan wrote:
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Gregory Taylor wrote:
After reading that article, if this product really is capable of
'counter striking DDoS attacks', my assumption is that it will fire
packets
After reading that article, if this product really is capable of
'counter striking DDoS attacks', my assumption is that it will fire
packets back at the nodes attacking it. Doing such an attack would not
be neither feasible or legal. You would only double the affect that the
initial attack ca
I remember the sidewinder. They had a huge marketing campaign aimed at
convincing the customer that their firewalls were inpenetrable. Their
firewalls didn't sell all that well, and those that did sell, proved to
be a colossal failure. I still have a deck of 'sidewinder' playing
cards from C
The IP that 2mbit.com inhabits is on a Road Runner commercial block,
which is allocated for small to mid-sized businesses. There is no
reason for commercial cable networks to be blocked under the same
pretenses that consumer cable networks are blocked.
Just my 2 cents
Greg
Matthew S. Halla
Hello Everyone, I'm new to this mailing list and as such I would like to
introduce myself.
My name is Gregory Taylor. Some of you know who I am and some of
you don't. For those who don't, I am a network and systems engineer up
here in the rainy northwest. I'd just
17 matches
Mail list logo
