[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're currently receiving the following prefix from
TeliaSonera on one of our IP transit links in Oslo:
aut-num:AS29049
as-name:Delta-Telecom-AS
descr: Delta Telecom LTD.
descr: International Communication Operator
descr:
Hi,
Following up on the thread about BGP communities, I was wondering if
there is a guide on how to actually implement communities within a
network...
There are a couple of presentations about why communities are good and
about the general design of communities but my googlefu has so far not
Robert Baxter wrote:
This may be of use to you.
http://www.secsup.org/Tracking/
Thanks, should have been more specific, its more a case of being able to
give traffic engineering like the ones listed on
http://www.onesc.net/communities/
J
--
COO
Entanet International
T: 0870 770 9580
W:
Joe Provo wrote:
A provider-hosted solution which
managed to transparently handle this across multiple clients and
trackers would likely be popular with the end users.
but not with the rights holders...
J
--
COO
Entanet International
T: 0870 770 9580
W: http://www.enta.net/
L:
Hex Star wrote:
Why is it that the US has ISP's with either no quotas or obscenely high
ones while countries like Australia have ISP's with ~12gb quotas? Is
there some kind of added cost running a non US ISP?
In the UK there is a very good reason - BT, see this write up:
Alexander Harrowell wrote:
Our Internet service is in the toilet again!
Yes, that's where we installed it..
http://www.computing.co.uk/vnunet/news/2196948/university-taps-sewers-internet
--
COO
Entanet International
T: 0870 770 9580
W: http://www.enta.net/
L: http://tinyurl.com/3bxqez
Hi all,
Sorry for the cross posting to a number of lists but this is an
important topic for many of you (especially if you get multiple copies).
As many people are aware there is an 'expectation' that 'consumer'
broadband providers introduce network level content blocking for
specified content
Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
[trimmed other lists, not sure if they'd appreciate nanog volumes]
On 7-jun-2007, at 11:06, James Blessing wrote:
As many people are aware there is an 'expectation' that 'consumer'
broadband providers introduce network level content blocking for
specified
Joe Abley wrote:
Anyway, how does BT's cleanfeed work? How are British 3G operators doing
equivalent blocking? I'd be interested in learning about the
implementation.
There is an excellent paper on the failures of clean feed here:
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rnc1/cleanfeed.pdf
J
--
COO
Jo Rhett wrote:
We've long been aware that BT *never* deals with spammers or DoS attacks
that originate from their network, but a new issue has come to light.
BT has a number of users who are apparently testing out stolen credit
card numbers from their network against stores of all
Shai Balasingham wrote:
We recently started to assign these blocks. So all the ranges are not
assigned yet. Following are some...
99.245.135.129
99.246.224.1
99.244.192.1
All reachable from here (as8468)
J
--
COO
Entanet International
T: 0870 770 9580
W: http://www.enta.net/
L:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eric Ortega wrote:
I am a network engineer for Midcontinent Communications We are an ISP in
the American Midwest. Recently, we were allocated a new network
assignment: 96.2.0.0/16. We've been having major issues with sites still
blocking this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Voellmy wrote:
I'm trying to learn about BGP and just ran across RPSL. I've seen
www.radb.net http://www.radb.net and know that lots of people are
registering their policies here. Are organizations also using these RPSL
policies to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You misunderstand. The problem of securing machines *IS* solved. It is
possible. It is regularly done with servers connected to the Internet.
There is no *COMPUTING* problem or technical problem.
True *BUT* (and this is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Gristina wrote:
I have two racks in London UK. The colocation is
currently in London. The contract is up soon and most
of the feet on the ground in the UK of the company is
in the greater Birmingham area. So I'm interested in
colocating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Very simply : Would you accept traffic from a customer who insists on sending 0
prefixes across a BGP session?
J
- --
COO
Entanet International
T: 0870 770 9580
http://www.enta.net/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Neil J. McRae wrote:
are you advertising them routes?
If so then why wouldn't you expect traffic?
-Original Message-
Very simply : Would you accept traffic from a customer who insists on
sending 0
prefixes across a BGP session?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Edward Lewis wrote:
Yeah, granted anyone looking for myspace might meet that demographic,
but how many neophytes would use Google for a IP Who Is search?
That's the listing I thought odd.
Having looked at the article isn't this a case of someone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jon Lyons wrote:
Get the guys direct number and start calling him all day. Direct
marketers/debt collectors really hate it when you call them at work and
bug them.. :)
Or give them a premium rate number that they can call that goes to permanent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Levine wrote:
He told me he would still calling until he got through to the right
person. I am the right person.
Next time, try asking for the name and phone number of his boss, so
you can call and report what an excellent job he's doing.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
matthew zeier wrote:
Does it simply provide an easy way to privately connect to transit and
peers? Or can I also go crazy and peer with anyone who wants to peer
(like in the olden day!) ?
EU peering is very different from US peering (as many
21 matches
Mail list logo