Have you called your ISP today?
On 4/16/08, Jake Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've sent repeated emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED]/com/*, no response yet.
> There is an IRC DDoS bot on EFnet actively attacking users - and has
> been for quite a while, as you can see from the signon date.
Abuse desk is a $0 revenue operation. Is it not obvious what the issue is?
Some of the folks that are complaining about abuse response generate
revenue addressing these issues. Give me some of that. I'll give you
a priority line to the NOC.
Disclaimer; No offense intended to security providers
Yes, it is operational.
Best,
Marty
On 4/15/08, Fred Reimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But isn't this what nanog is for? It appears to be more on-topic than the
> email threads. More E than S.
>
> Fred Reimer, CISSP, CCNP, CQS-VPN, CQS-ISS
> Senior Network Engineer
> Coleman Technologies,
> -Original Message-
> From: Randy Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 12:56 PM
> To: Martin Hannigan
> Cc: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: nanog volume (was: Problems sending mail to yahoo?)
>
> > Can we wrap the mail threads up
>
&
Folks,
Same request as the Yahoo! Mail thread, can we go ahead and wrap this
up? Excellent points, intelligent positions, but definitely not
operational. This one might be great for ASRG, which has been a little
more active lately.
Best Regards,
Marty
--
Martin Hannigan
Folks,
Can we wrap the mail threads up or at least move them over to their
respective best-places like zorch, nsp-sec, spam-l, asrg, or
yet-another-favorite-list-for-spam-religion? We've gone far beyond
typical mass-mail operations.
Best Regards,
Marty
--
Martin Han
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 1:58 AM, Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ clip ]
> > I heartily second this. Yahoo (and Hotmail) (and Comcast and Verizon)
> > mail system personnel should be actively participating here, on mailop,
> > on spam-l, etc. A lot of problems could be solved (and some a
a good
> reason not to do business with these companies.
>
> I don't take my time to post on NANOG to invite a deluge of sales
> calls.
If we catch them, we'll act. We added some language related to that to
the new AUP and have been able to act on it as a result.
--
Mart
ew spam all the time. The most spam
I receive is from an old domain that I turned off the MX records. Every
now and then I turn them back on to see what's flowing and it never
changes. Within seconds.
[obOp] I think that the language change defeats many of the heurist
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Deepak Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There is no reason to assume these are civilian satellites. Any one of a
> number of affected or interested countries could have provided the imagery
> (or ship information) to Reliance. Its not saying *who* analyzed the i
Has this circuit ever run clean(normal)?
-M<
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Brian Raaen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am currently having problems get upload bandwidth on a Sprint circuit. I am
> using a full OC3 circuit. I am doing fine on downloading data, but uploading
> data I can on
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 6:06 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > I doubt we'll ever see the day when running gigabit across
> > town becomes cost effective when compared to running gigabit
> > to the other end of your server room/cage/whatever.
>
> You show me the ISP with the majority of t
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 10:09 PM, bill fumerola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ disclaimer: i work for opendns. ]
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 05:53:15PM -0400, Martin Hannigan wrote:
[ snip ]
> so, to recap:
> nope, we don't sell NXDOMAIN data. we don't se
>
> I think it's best that we let David Ulevitch and the crew @ OpenDNS make
> the money that is to be made off this. He's doing good while doing well.
Why shouldn't anyone be able to "make the money"? The problem with
that post wasn't that he was advocating law breaking, it was that it's
a mar
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Barry Shein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Is this for real?
>
> Someone asks a harmless question about setting up multiple default
> routes, not about Barack Obama or whether the moon is made of green
> cheese, but about default routes.
>
> Then 10 people d
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Steve Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ snip ]
> I wonder who he's paying for his nxdomain data, and whether that
> someone is authorized to sell it. It strikes me that it's just a small
> step for someone with access to ISP internal data to go from selling
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Steve Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mar 20, 2008, at 9:56 AM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Ray Demain wrote:
> >> We are looking to purchase NXDOMAIN data for an in
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Ray Demain wrote:
> We are looking to purchase NXDOMAIN data for an internet survey.
>
> We prefer to receive the data on an hourly basis so it is as fresh as
> possible. Our system receives the data from you via ftp that you provide.
> Its hard to value the data
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Tomas L. Byrnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Clearly, they are incensed by youtube content, so what makes anyone
> think that they would not be trying to engage in a case of Cyber-Jihad?
>
Let's avoid speculation as to the why and reserve this thread for
glob
There's also some golf taking place, but it might be too late for this
NANOG. If you golf and attend NANOG drop me a line and we'll set you
up with the specifics. We're also close to being able to crertify a
PGA sanctioned club. ;)
Search Facebook for 'Internet Golf Society' and join for more in
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 9:49 PM, K. Scott Bethke
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sorry if this is off-topic frustration has set in. I've got what
> looks like a routing loop or a wedge in your network and I cant get
> past tier2 saying it is an "internet problem". I asked to speak with
> an
Obviously, this was meant to be a private communication. My apologies
for cc'ing the nanog list, it was intended to follow the admins
procedure and go to nanog admins and respect the feelings of the
poster.
Best Regards,
Martin
On Feb 5, 2008 9:10 PM, Martin Hannigan <[EMAIL P
,
Martin Hannigan
NANOG MLC Member
On Feb 5, 2008 7:33 PM, John Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sent: Tue 2/5/2008 2:49 PM
> To: John Lee
> Subject: Jeanette Symons
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi John,
>
On Feb 4, 2008 12:38 AM, Sean Donelan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Todd Underwood wrote:
> > there has has been a lot of speculation that this is all some US
> > prelude to war with iran. while i don't claim to know much about
> > whether that makes any sense, i do know that
Marshall:
I don't see any cables for Lebanon. I also don't see any cable for
Syria. I see "Falcon" coming down an estuary on an edge border for
Jordan. In proximity, Israel has some redundancy, although I don't
have the granularity to strip out the specific cables. It looks like a
"branch" to me,
Hi Michael:
On Feb 1, 2008 6:44 PM, Michael Painter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Here's at least one:
>
> http://www.ofcc.com/procedures.htm
Yes, this is the idea.
My experience is that fisherman coops, similar to this one for network
operators, are contacted during the desk top study "DTS"
On Feb 1, 2008 2:25 PM, Ahmed Maged (amaged) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> "Does look normal to me" is far from a global conspiracy theory.
>
>
> Thank you for the translation but I think you got it wrong.
>
I agree, there should be a sanity check as I understand that they are
within close
On Feb 1, 2008 11:43 AM, Steven M. Bellovin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's an interesting article at
> http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/technology/AP-Internet-Outages-Cables.html
> on cable chokepoints.
>
"NEW YORK (AP) -- The lines that tie the globe together by carrying
phone calls and In
On Jan 31, 2008 11:20 AM, Rod Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> http://www.kisca.org.uk/Web_SWApproaches.pdf
>
> And if you enlarge the map, you can see little dots on the lines
> representing the cables that denote repairs.
>
> Lots and lots of repairs. Treacherous waters.
>
>
The dista
On Jan 31, 2008 4:30 AM, Hank Nussbacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>\
>
> I think more interesting is the landing stations where numerous cables
> intersect. They may be diverse in the water, but they cluster around each
> other when they hit the landing stations.
>
> -Hank
They aren't that
On Jan 31, 2008 2:08 AM, Paul Ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> - -- "Martin Hannigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >In the Med/IO cable case, a ship dropped an anchor on the cable,
> &g
On Jan 30, 2008 9:41 PM, Todd Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 01:56:42AM +, Paul Ferguson wrote:
> >
> > For what its worth, Todd Underwood has a very good overview of the
> > countries affected by this outage over on the Renesys Blog here:
> >
> > http://w
Folks, we'd like to ask that this thread die a quick and painful
death. It's gone off topic and it seems to have run whatever short
course that it tried. While what Europe does is interesting to us as
network operators, this is European policy and off topic for NANOG.
Best Regard
On Jan 15, 2008 3:52 PM, Joe Greco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Joe Greco wrote:
> > > I have no idea what the networking equivalent of thirty-seven half-eaten
> > > bags of Cheetos is, can't even begin to imagine what the virtual
> > > equivalent
> > > of my couch is, etc. Your metaphor doe
messages that contain nothing but an empty request for
"someone from xyz to contact $foo" for an unknown reason. I think it's
fair for us to ask for some content if we're going to see these
requests forwarded to ~9k users.
Best Regards,
Martin Hannigan
NANOG MLC Member
ter.
Best Regards,
Martin Hannigan
NANOG Mailing List Committee
On Dec 30, 2007 9:42 PM, Michael Greb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I've attempted to contact DreamHost NOC or Abuse departments via the
> numbers in whois but just get voice mail and no call back.
>
> I've got a user sending a lot of UDP traffi
Hello Folks:
That would be a slip of the auto-completion function. I can't really
think of how to operationalize NYE so I'll have to apologize instead.
Sorry for the mis-directed email!
Best Regards and Happy Holidays,
Marty
On Dec 29, 2007 2:29 AM, Martin Hannigan <[EM
Ok folks, what's the plan? I think we should opt to join each others
company at either Brasserie Jo's, or Blu. I can't speak for Jo's NYE,
but Blu NYE has optional fireworks viewing on their deck facing the
common. Should be pretty awesome. $99 bux.
Significant others invited, of course, and anyo
On Nov 20, 2007 2:21 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ snip ]
> - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> (reason: 552 5.2.0 F77u1Y00B2ccxfT000 Message Refused. A URL in the
> content of your message was found on...uribl.com. For resol
On Nov 20, 2007 3:11 PM, Alex Pilosov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:21:19 PST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > > This seems a rather unwise policy on behalf of cox.net -- their
> > > customers can originate scam emails, but c
Dear Colleagues:
This morning, a new Acceptable Use Policy was posted on the NANOG website.
http://www.nanog.org/aup.html
Please be aware of it and note some significant changes. Much of the
language like "discouraged" was removed so that readers of the list
can interpret the AUP clearly vs
On Nov 15, 2007 1:44 PM, Raymond L. Corbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Multiple outbound gateways have been having problems with the MXLogic
inbound servers over the past few days >and the tier1 support
continues to say that our IP's are not on their blacklists and that
there shouldn't be anythin
helpful and the Merit
folks are as competent (or more in some cases) as any of us.
We'll keep you posted and do a post mortem.
Best Regards,
Martin Hannigan
NANOG MLC Member
On Nov 9, 2007 11:00 AM, Bill Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Given the serious impact this is having on operations, does this have a
> master ticket number or escalation id of some type? Has the vendor been
> involved yet? When can we expect to see a post mortem/RFO?
>
> - billn
Try not to
et us
know about this.
Best Regards,
Martin Hannigan
NANOG MLC Member
Folks,
A brief update.
The team at Merit has identified what is causing the mailer messages
to come back to the entire list. The admin team at Merit is working on
a solution. Please do continue to ignore the message. We'll update
again when there is a solution.
Best Regards,
Martin Han
On Nov 6, 2007 5:35 PM, Greg Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
[ snip ]
> Hmmm. When using IE 7 on Windows Vista out of the box, and I give it
> a non-existent domain, it prompts me to connect to a network (even if
> I'm already connected to one). It also puts the browser in "work
> offlin
Regards,
Martin Hannigan
NANOG MLC Member
d this myself in a few topics
related to spam ddos and surrounding tools and techniques.
The only thing I'd ask is that people don't branch off threads. It
messes up our killfiles. :-)
Martin Hannigan
NANOG MLC Member
were a NAMOG (North American Mail Operators Group) or
> the like to resolve these sorts of issues. Feel free to clue-by-four
> me if I've missed it.
>
Hi Chuck,
Mail problems that are operational in nature are more than welcome
here. The politics and kookery of spam policy and fighting
On 10/29/07, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 10/29/07, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > "Unfortunately, we cannot provide you with
> > > specific information other than to suggest a review
> > > of the questionnaire we supplied and try
On 10/26/07, Scott Weeks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ snip ]
> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: David Ulevitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Often times when I get these (and it's pretty often) I just take their
> email address and add it to my list of people we send out RFQs to.
[..and.. ]
> Yo
On 10/25/07, Al Iverson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 10/25/07, Weier, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Any Hotmail/MSN/Live postmasters around?
> >
> > My company sends subscription-based news emails -- which go to thousands of
> > users within Hotmail/MSN/Live. I appear to be getting
On 10/15/07, Mark Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> >
> >
> >On 15/10/2007, at 8:24 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
> >
> >> [moresnip]
> >>
> >> The way I read the portion of the th
On 10/14/07, Iljitsch van Beijnum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 14-okt-2007, at 19:34, Martin Hannigan wrote:
>
> > Is this a configurable option for the inverse behavoir? Seems to me
> > that it should be since it affects the user experience and sets policy
> > f
On 13 Oct 2007 15:47:16 +, Paul Vixie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Nathan Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > ...
> > Nice rant though :-)
>
> agreed.
>
> > ...
> > Does anyone have info on how bind (and other recursive resolvers)
> > select whether to use v6 or v4 if an NS points at a re
On 10/12/07, Steve Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 12, 2007, at 5:08 PM, Mark Foster wrote:
>
>
> >
> > (If some random dynamic IP host on the other side of the world
> > started hitting my firewall for no apparent reason, i'd be raising
> > my eyebrows too. Of course, these days,
e for this. You
could also try OnForce http://www.onforce.com/. Thanks for your help.
Best Regards,
Martin Hannigan
NANOG MLC Member
On 10/5/07, Darin Pesnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I was wondering if anyone on the list works for Comcast or could help me get
> in touch with them to discuss the requirements for establishing a peering
> relationship. So far our efforts to contact them have not resulted in
>
On 9/28/07, Paul Ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> - -- "Hex Star" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This problem is easily solved by simply rejecting mail sent by servers on
> > dynamic IP ranges...
>
> Great. I guess we can all go home now
On 9/27/07, Raymond L. Corbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you check the source IP in the headers? My logs show that they are
> coming from a buncha residential IP addresses so its prolly a bot
> network doing it. Most of the messages going through our servers with
> that have the domain lifel
Folks,
I'm receiving about 25K spams per minute with this subject:
Subject: "Looking for Sex Tonight? Curtis Blackman"
They randomize the name on the subject line. Is this any particular
virus/malware/zombie signature and any suggestion on how to defend
against it besides what I
On 9/21/07, Mark Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> >
> >On 9/15/07, Jeroen Massar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> [spam: Check http://www.sixxs.net/misc/toys/ for an IPv6 Toy Gallery :)]
> >>
> >> Somewhat long, hopefully useful content follows...
>
On 9/15/07, Jeroen Massar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [spam: Check http://www.sixxs.net/misc/toys/ for an IPv6 Toy Gallery :)]
>
> Somewhat long, hopefully useful content follows...
>
> Barrett Lyon wrote:
> [..]
[ clip ]
> Of course when there is only a A or only that protocol will be
> u
On 9/17/07, Barrett Lyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On a totally unrelated note: Not to make any accusation on the
> security of the end-point tunnel network what-so-ever, but an
> entirely other issue is the tiny bit of a security conundrum that
> default tunnels create -- tunneling traffic
On 9/17/07, Iljitsch van Beijnum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 17-sep-2007, at 19:06, Martin Hannigan wrote:
>
> > Getting back to my original discussion with Barrett, what should we do
> > about naming? I initially though that segregating v6 in a subdomain
> > w
On 9/15/07, Iljitsch van Beijnum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 15-sep-2007, at 21:25, Barrett Lyon wrote:
>
> > The other thought that occurred to me, does FF/Safari/IE have any
> > ability to default back to v4 if v6 is not working or behaving
> > badly? This could be a helpful transition feat
On 9/15/07, Barrett Lyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > How did you do the naming? Matching or unique?
>
> Matched , I was thinking about doing a w6 or something more
> unique for now, but that somewhat defeats the point.
I tried to do it in a round robin record based on the describe
On 9/15/07, Iljitsch van Beijnum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 15-sep-2007, at 21:25, Barrett Lyon wrote:
>
> > The other thought that occurred to me, does FF/Safari/IE have any
> > ability to default back to v4 if v6 is not working or behaving
> > badly? This could be a helpful transition feat
On 9/15/07, Barrett Lyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
[ snip ]
> We removed on our production hosts shortly after we deployed it,
> our global v6 deployment goes production next week, at which time I
> may re-add the to limited production. If we do this, I publish
> a report of the
On 9/12/07, Ross Vandegrift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 08:36:45AM -0400, Joe Abley wrote:
> > This (the general subject of how to keep real-world cabinets tidy and
> > do cabling in a sane way) seems like an excellent topic for a NANOG
> > tutorial. I'd come, for sure :
On 8/27/07, Raymond L. Corbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm experiencing a lot of problems with about 8 of our outbound mail
> gateways to the MSN/Live mail servers throughout the day. Are there any
> mail/sysadmins on this list, or anyone that can get me in contact with
> someone
I do have a volunteer from EFF...
I had mentioned that both VeriSign and Neustar have people that are
fluent in the
technical and general legal issues as well as the legal aspects. It
would seem to make more sense to solicit one of those organizations
since NANOG is about operations, and not p
> http://www.circleid.com/posts/submit_comment/splitting_root_too_late/
I tried to look, but I can't seem to find circleid.com; perhaps
bestbuy is intercepting my dns traffic :)
It's quite possible these days. :-)
http://www.circleid.com/posts/splitting_root_too_late/
I gave you a better URL
"Furthermore, at least one large ISP in Europe is doing the same
thing, redirecting root server traffic to their own servers."
http://www.circleid.com/posts/submit_comment/splitting_root_too_late/
"Furthermore, at least one large ISP in Europe is doing the same
thing, redirecting root server tr
Dear Colleagues:
Anyone have a pointer to a list of regulations, or know off the top of
your head, related to data privacy at US ISP's? CALEA? CANSPAM? DMCA?
et. al.
Please reply off list and I will summarize responses back to the list
at a later date.
Best Regards,
Martin
>Sorry if this is OT but we are having a discussion with our HR
department. We are in the process of getting a 24 X 7 NOC in place and
HR has a problem with calling them NOC Specialist. What is the
generally accepted title?
Interesting marketing problem.
I like to use NOC as the 'group' and
>Upon leaving a router at telx and asking one of their techs to plug
>in the equipment for me, I came back to find all my cat5 cables neatly
>tied with some sort of waxed twine, using an interesting looping knot
>pattern that repeated every six inches or so using a single piece of
>string. F
rary to standard Internet and operator policy.
They can't, and I doubt anyone is very worried about a lawsuit
from ISC. Legal geniuses they are not.
-M<
--
Martin Hannigan(c) 617-388-2663
Renesys Corporation(w) 617-39
ttp://www.circleid.com/posts/paul_vixie_on_fort_nocs/
YMMV:
Best Regards,
Martin
--
Martin Hannigan(c) 617-388-2663
Renesys Corporation(w) 617-395-8574
Member of Technical Staff
answer the first two yes, the third is worth
trying to make "no".
-M<
--
Martin Hannigan(c) 617-388-2663
Renesys Corporation(w) 617-395-8574
Member of Technical Staff
with Internet standards
- companies agreed to have IP space allocation and utilization
reviewed and certified by their auditors and results submitted
to ARIN on a yearly basis as condition of use
I'll see you in the lobby Sunday for my free trip to McCormack
and Schmicks. ;-)
-M<
At 06:05 AM 9/4/2006, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
On 01.09 13:47, Martin Hannigan wrote:
>
> I can't get a TLD zone? But back to the root servers. Are you
> agreering with me that if I announce F and I root's netblocks
> inside of my own network that everyone would be ok wi
At 03:50 PM 9/1/2006, Joe Abley wrote:
On 1-Sep-2006, at 15:07, Martin Hannigan wrote:
Well, let's rephrase that. Anyone can't get a TLD zone?
While there are many smaller TLD zones that don't get updated very
often and which have wide-open AXFR to all and sundry, I
At 02:36 PM 9/1/2006, Joe Abley wrote:
On 1-Sep-2006, at 13:47, Martin Hannigan wrote:
I can't get a TLD zone?
*You* can do anything, Marty! You are the man! :-)
Well, let's rephrase that. Anyone can't get a TLD zone?
And no, you are the man. :)
But back to the root s
At 12:37 PM 9/1/2006, Joe Abley wrote:
On 1-Sep-2006, at 02:11, Martin Hannigan wrote:
>You seem to be suggesting that ISPs run stealth slaves for these
>kinds of zones. This may have been a useful pointer for ISPs in days
>gone by, but I think today it's impractical advice.
one by, but I think today it's impractical advice.
How so? Anyone can get a zone and turn up [a-m] on-net
and outperform (response and uptime) many of the existing
instances of root servers. I'm quite confident it would work
as designed.
Where's Dean Anderson when
e in
the ccTLD. They are responsible for the uptime.
There is a comment period taking place related
to the ICANN IANA root zone checks. This made me think of it.
http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-18aug06.htm
-M<
[ ObOffTopic: Maybe Paris Hilton can teach then about "separ
st week and
peaked out tonight at almost a full second for a resolution of anything.
-M<
--
Martin Hannigan(c) 617-388-2663
Renesys Corporation(w) 617-395-8574
Member of Technical Staff
e any
constructive criticism on the pitfalls to deploy before we are all dead.
-rick
I'm not. Consensus usually comes after the party, not before.
-M<
--
Martin Hannigan(c) 617-388-2663
Renesys Corporation(w) 617-395-8
ng this work for some time and
deserves some credit so I'd say "have you spoken to them about how
to make their report better" yet instead of "create more".
-M<
--
Martin Hannigan(c) 617-388-2663
Renesys Corporation
posting here has become arguably low as of late. Maybe
it's because of too much rain? I don't know, but NTP, geo-location,
and CALEA have all been subject to this.
/me back to our regularly scheduled programming
--Michael Dillon
--
Martin Hannigan
nd from the folks at SBC, you
did not run harassing call, annoyance call, and LAES services. I would
appreciate a correction.
-M<
--
Martin Hannigan(c) 617-388-2663
Renesys Corporation
's not really fair to baseline the credibility of
any geo location discussion based on hostip.info.
There are much better commercial services like Quovus,
MaxMind, and Akamai.
-M<
--
Martin Hannigan(c) 617-388-2663
Renesys Corporation
At 02:11 PM 5/17/2006, Steve Gibbard wrote:
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Martin Hannigan wrote:
And there are many, with many TLD's.
(rough counts)
provider/tld's
UDNS 48
ISC 19
PCH 8
PSG 23
ICANN 4
UUNET 61
RIPE 87
DEC 10
NIC.FR 71
Note: There is cross servicing of TLDs counted ab
resting for location purposes, but of course, that's already
been thought of. :)
-M<
--
Martin Hannigan(c) 617-388-2663
Renesys Corporation(w) 617-395-8574
Member of Technical Staff
p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6947978.PN.&OS=PN/6947978&RS=PN/6947978
-M<
--
Martin Hannigan(c) 617-388-2663
Renesys Corporation(w)
r geo locating
in their Trends product. I'd tend to doubt it. Anything is possible, I
suppose.
-M<
On 5/15/06, Martin Hannigan
<<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 01:56 PM 5/15/2006,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
pplying this type of thinking to Internet doomsday scenarios
will be key in survivability, IMHO. If you want every solution
to be 100%, we're likely to be down for some factor longer than
we need to be.
Anyhow, back to your regularly scheduled show. :-)
-M<
--
Martin
1 - 100 of 240 matches
Mail list logo
