-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De
la part de Randy Bush
Envoyé : mardi 22 novembre 2005 09:35
À : Edward W. Ray
Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : RE: route-views.routeviews.org down?
1555 ms55 ms55 ms www.routeviews.org
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Sean Donela n writes:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Blaine Christian wrote:
We are talking about an infrastructure that does not lend itself
very well to market forces. In many places FFTH and/or
DSL
Was that a device trying to phone home and get it's configs?
Cisco, Nortel, etc. phone home and get configs via tftp.
Vonage doesn't need to phone home for config. The device is
programmed
(router) and it registers with the call manager.
If you analyze the transactions it's
ssh, or other schemes of enhanced security...?
mh
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De
la part de Daniel Golding
Envoyé : mardi 15 février 2005 23:39
À : Jason L. Schwab; Martin Hannigan
Cc : nanog@merit.edu
Objet : Re: Vonage complains about
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
Something else to consider. We block TFTP at our border for
security reasons and we've found that this prevents
Vonage from
working.
Vonage devices initiate an outbound
ssh, or other schemes of enhanced security...?
We have some that use https, but that is as about as secure
as it gets. We also encrypt config files, so that helps.
Likely (at least for the time being :) better than nothing (or of
course use of naked protocols). My (inherited) point
an argument that is valid and focus on the spelling?
This thread has gotten a bit long in the tooth, so I'm
waiting for Godwin's law to take effect.
Yes, quite a bit OT for this list... Other lists and forums
around...
Thanks,
mh
--
Michael Hallgren, AS6453, mh2198-ripe
--
Robin
test
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De
la part de Eric Pylko
Envoyé : lundi 5 juillet 2004 22:02
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Announcing a /19 from a /16
Hi-
I'm working on a project within a large corporation and asked
their network
Hi-
I'm working on a project within a large corporation and asked
their network folks about getting a /19 from one of their
/16s. I wanted it to avoid NAT and any possible overlapping
from using RFC1918 addresses. This project gets connected to
the internet at different
Hi,
Hi James,
i would agree except NAC seems to have done nothing
unreasonable and are executing cancellation clauses in there
contract which are pretty standard. The customer's had plenty
of time to sort things and they have iether been unable to or
unwilling to move out in the
Per Gregers Bilse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 28, 10:37am, Sam Stickland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there any BGP extensions that would cause a BGP
speaker to foward
all of it's paths, not just it best? I believe quagga had
made some
recent attempts
It has been
snip
uRPF in the core seems like a bad plan, what with diverse
routes and such.
Loose-mode might help SOME, but really spoofing is such a low
priority issue why make it a requirement? Customer triggered
blackholing is a nice feature though.
/snip
Shared view,
mh (Teleglobe, btw)
Global Crossing has this, already in production.
Idem, Teleglobe,
mh
I was on the phone with Qwest yesterday this was one of
this things I asked about. Qwest indicated they are going to
deploy this shortly. (i.e., send routes tagged with a
community which they will set to null)
Deaggregation is at an all time high, I have raised this
publically in some forums and IXP ops lists. Response is
poor, action is non-existent.
The only way I can see to do anything about this is for
upstreams to educate their customers and others to pressure
their peers.
Two
You mean like Level3?
Well,... proxying (in any shape) should, hopefully, not happen prior to
having a decent downstream trust relation onboard... (?)...
mh
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Steven M. Bellovin
Sent: Wednesday,
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 04:55:44PM +0300, Petri Helenius wrote:
Does anyone know, either on the east coast US, London, Stockholm,
Copenhagen, Amsterdam or Helsinki transit providers which would allow
edge/handoff interface control to different traffic classes using BGP
way along.. building cotton walls.. ('cause
I wouldn't want my highway provider limit my driving experience in the
case I eventually run into a better performing car..). More subtle highway
speed versus security considerations... neglected, of course :)
/ohh
mh
--
Michael Hallgren, http
.. but anyway: someone informed on planned role of
policyanalysismarket.org ?
Out of curiosity,
mh
Businesses that ask for email addresses know that a significant percentage
of people can't type their own email address correctly. Each of those
results in a bounce, or an undeliverable message sitting in an mqueue
somewhere. It would not surprise me if they also reduced their
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Deepak Jain wrote:
I strongly approve of such requirement. I know that it is in
the peering
agreements of several carriers, but they often don't check or enforce
this. Many register customer routes and ASes. If routes and policies
were properly
Hi guys,
What's the currently efficient/preferred way of updating (replacing, rather
than
adding) a record at http://puck.nether.net/netops/ :: NOC Telephone List ?
Cheers,
mh
--
Michael Hallgren, http://m.hallgren.free.fr/, mh2198-ripe
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 07:40:46PM +0200, Michael Hallgren wrote:
Hi guys,
What's the currently efficient/preferred way of updating
(replacing, rather
than
adding) a record at http://puck.nether.net/netops/ :: NOC
Telephone List ?
Cheers,
Jared,
You need
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
Who actually uses RADB to build filters other than Verio? While my
experience with other providers is limited Verio is the only one (of the
ones we have used) who used RADB entries for BGP peers.
AFAIK, Level3 and CW.
Teleglobe as well
.ro -- try their London or Amsterdam guys. In an earlier life --
Teleglobe -- I
found them quite responsive (at least EU daytime :).
Cheers
mh
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de
Sorin Constantinescu
Envoye : jeudi 26 septembre 2002 20:21
Hi Yu,
Hi nanog,
Have any idea of the current popular trouble ticket system for the NOC ?
The system used to accept, dispatch, close, store and search trouble
ticket
or customer case ? It's pretty much a NOC work flow system, but more
focused
on IP NOC.
So what's the popular one ? How about
Hi,
FYI,
I'm currently sitting as customer to 5511, and I see your two mentioned
addresses behind ATT (NY peering FT-ATT), NAC.
mh
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de
Gerald
Envoye : samedi 31 aout 2002 16:55
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 01:09:54PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anybody mentioned the benefits of ISIS as an IGP to them.
Link-state protocols are evil, and when they break, they *really*
break.
I still do not see a compeling argument for not using BGP as your
IGP.
Um. Set up more than one reflector
yes... and align your setup with your physical topology(so making it
useful);
use other proto for mapping your infra, etc, etc,..
mh
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Ralph Doncaster wrote:
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Peter van Dijk wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at
[...]
the lower range controlled by ARIN. No idea why ARIN doesn't have a
record
for it...they only carry records for ASN 16779, which is Telstra-USA.
Andy
I noticed that as well. But a quick google shows that Telstra is most
definitely AS1221. Maybe they forgot to renew one of
That's a little odd, considering that's included in a range of AS' that
RIPE shows as delegated to ARIN. Anyone have any ideas?
aut-num AS1221, inverse
[...]
remarks AS assigned by the former InterNIC
[...]
source APNIC
mh
Derek
-Original
aut-num AS1221, inverse
as-name ASN-TELSTRA
descrTelstra Pty Ltd
descrLocked Bag No. 5744
descrGPO, Canberra, ACT, 2601
country AU
admin-c GH105-AP, inverse
tech-c
Please correct me if I am wrong. This is not allowing the practice of
selling IPs or ASes,
I've never really come around to fully understand the notion (more and
more common, it seems) of _selling_ such..? (Maybe I'm an idealist :)
but it encourages those of us who have acquired other
: operational importance, in deed and afaik, for
commercial as well as for RE. Let's hope for some 11th hour fix...
mh
Rob
--
Michael Hallgren, http://m.hallgren.free.fr/, MH2198-RIPE
34 matches
Mail list logo
