I shut the last down a few days ago, actually: a piece of spam mail
went through the list and one of the few remaining subscribers got
trigger-happy and complained to _my_ isp about it. Since no other
mail had gone over the list in months, I yanked it.
It was a lovely idea, but never really gai
In the immortal words of Robert E. Seastrom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > and, if you want to see a particularly broken example, buy "internet
> > service" from t-mobile gprs in the states, port 22 blocked, no smtp
> > relay, ... "walled garden" mentality
In the immortal words of Tim Wilde ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> And they act like they're the victims. Amazing.
>
> "Without so much as a hearing, ICANN today formally asked us to shut down
> the Site Finder service," said VeriSign spokesman Tom Galvin. "We will
> accede to their request while we e
In the immortal words of Scott McGrath ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> 1 - Purchase a Cesium clock this is a Primary Time/Frequency standard
> which does not require access to a reference standard to maintain
> accuracy.
>
> This is a Stratum 0 source so once placed behind a Unix/Cisco/Ju
In the immortal words of Justin Shore ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
>
>
> I can think of 6 different console cable pinouts and connectors that
> Enterasys (Cabletron) has used over the years. No wait, make that 7. How
> could I forget the inherited Fore ATM architecture and subsequent blades.
>
In the immortal words of Wayne E. Bouchard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> So then now instead of mail to misspelled domains, instead of
> bouncing, now goes to /dev/null and you have no idea that your
> critically important piece of information didn't get through?
You _hope_ it goes to /dev/null.
It mig
In the immortal words of Matthew Crocker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> Shouldn't customers that purchase IP services from an ISP use the ISPs
> mail server as a smart host for outbound mail?
Given the way that most ISP "shared resource" machines (including but
hardly limited to DNS caching/recursi
In the immortal words of Richard Welty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 15:25:46 -0700 (PDT) "Gary E. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > returning 127.0.0.2 for everything would be an ugly way to bow out.
>
> yes, but it's been done before.
And oddly enough, it was a terrible id
In the immortal words of Leo Bicknell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> Has anyone else gotten one of these?
Dozens, and have bitbucketed them on every single mail server I can
get my hands on.
> It appears they are trolling a Nanog archive on the web and sending
> these out to posters. *sigh*
They
In the immortal words of [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Austad, Jay wrote:
> > As a side note, I've used Cisco's CSS, F5's stuff, Alteon, and Foundry. Out
> > of all of them that I've used, the Foundry had the least problems and had a
> > nicely structured config.
In the immortal words of Paul Vixie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > It might also be port 113 -- some sites try to query your tcp port 113,
> > and wait for a timeout if the port is firewalled. A better solution
> > than blocking it is to send an immediate RST.
>
> people who depend on tcp/113 des
In the immortal words of Jack Bates ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > Whats wrong with the nanog-offtopic list ?
>
> The legal issues are technical on-topic and nanog related. However,
> there are some that want to know what's going on in the legal system,
> and others that don't. At the same time, t
In the immortal words of Avleen Vig ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> Look it's very simple.
> If you steal something, you go to jail. That's really nto hard to
> understand, and the reason it doesn't happen more often, is because
> prison systems are already too full of people convicted of more serious
>
In the immortal words of [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> I suggest that an appropriate technique would be for the BIND server to
> originate traffic on it's local subnet that would look suspicious and
> possibly trigger intrusion alarms.
Good lord.
I'm a little stuck for a proper
In the immortal words of Geo. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
>
> Can someone verify something for me?
> Do an NSLOOKUP for www.stemtostern.com and stemtostern.com against the
> i.gtld-servers.net
> why would the www one resolve?
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0596001584/
Sheesh.
--
In the immortal words of blitz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> From ISN:
>
> >http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/28842.html
Wow. With one post to bugtraq, gobbles has now successfully trolled
the register, slashdot, and now nanog.
Somebody buy that turkey a beer.
-n
---
In the immortal words of Gregory Hicks ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> There IS another list that goes to about the same group of people...
>
> NANOG-OT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Indeed. It's rather underutilized these days -- there was a spasm of
activity right after 9/11, when I created it -- but it's still
In the immortal words of [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> Its used primarily by very small sstem operators and I don't
> know any isp of any serious size (i.e. over 1000 users or domains) that is
> using them
Sprintlink, mail.com/iname/outblaze, and I believe possibly PacBell
all us
In the immortal words of Sean M. Doran ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> i hate spamarrest. i really do. i hate it.
> you don't know who you are, but lots of the rest of us do.
64.39.29.161:allow,RBLSMTPD="-learn to filter on precedence headers, idiots"
Adjust for local filtering methodology.
-n
In the immortal words of Paul Vixie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> The trouble is, often times I'd rather hire the world's smartest garbage
> man. I never forget that when I got done interviewing for my first full
> time programming job I went back to my job fixing cars and pumping gas, and
> my fall
In the immortal words of Mitch Halmu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> (Rev. Martin Niemoller, 1945)
Congratulations, Mitch, you have done what many of us would have
considered impossible: you have surpassed your own previous high-water
mark for tasteless, self-involved bullshit. (Which, for the
short-
In the immortal words of [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Sun, 05 May 2002 18:15:15 EDT, "Nathan J. Mehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > people that this had happened to? I'd file a class-action liability
> > suit against Microsoft for sell
In the immortal words of [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >
> > So we have a choice: pay for the (very nice but expensive) commercial
> > product, or add forty percent to our mail spool disk farm and extra
> > cpus and ram in the mail server farm to deal with the additional
> > influx.
In the immortal words of John R. Levine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> * It swaps the current set of problems for an all-new and quite
> possibly worse set of problems, as bad guys come up with ways to
> scam the per-message payment system. Just think, get infected with
> e-payment klez via you
In the immortal words of Simon Higgs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> SOAs with bogus.domain.names pointing to 127.0.0.1 appear to be causing
> email to bounce (amongst other things).
If there is actually an MTA out there so broken that it tries to
connect to the server mentioned in the SOA MNAME fie
25 matches
Mail list logo
