On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Brad Knowles wrote:
At 5:17 PM -0400 2005-06-28, Mark Tombaugh wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 09:54 -0400, Robert Boyle wrote:
we enabled a global rule which blocks
any email from accounts such as billing, root, postmaster, antivirus,
abuse, security, etc. which don't
On Sat, 9 Apr 2005, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
Just wondering how many have transitioned to djbdns from bind
If transitioning from BIND, why go to the non-free and non-compliant
djbdns instead of nsd (http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/nsd/)?
I couldn't agree more. At least BIND9 and NSD both support RFC 4035
[ It is a bit off topic, but I am looking for people who have travelled
through Heathrow lately with the new x-ray scanner, and nanog people are
generally engaged in a lot of traveling ]
I was just pointed out to this article:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/11/18/blunkett_xray_blank/
It says:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Randy Bush wrote:
The problem is that the world *won't let me* be a well functioning
exception.
Correction, the world *can't* let you be a well functioning exception.
not true. it can but many have decided not to.
Just like I also 'chose' to not read messages tagged by softwar
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Lars-Johan Liman wrote:
I *understand* that I'm a rare exception.
The problem is that the world *won't let me* be a well functioning
exception.
Correction, the world *can't* let you be a well functioning
exception.
People always scream 'no censorship', but there is only that ma
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, Lars-Johan Liman wrote:
It's too d---ned cheap to send out spam, and it'll be too d---ned
cheap to sell your stuff over VOIP in the future.
But we've fixed that! We added a ENUM layer with DNSSEC on top of it.
So now we can decide what to tell our potential callers without them
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Greg Schwimer wrote:
whois -h whois.ripe.net
% This is the RIPE Whois secondary server.
% The objects are in RPSL format.
%
% Rights restricted by copyright.
% See http://www.ripe.net/db/copyright.html
inetnum: 0.0.0.0 - 255.255.255.255
netname: IANA-BLK
descr:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Paul Vixie wrote:
> (and if the idea that kc or woolf could be depended upon to parrot
> somebody else's point of view caused you to laugh so hard you spewed
> coffee all over your keyboard while reading the above tidbits, then
> send the repair bill to verisign, not me. i'm
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
> What I AM looking for is a commentary from the internet community,
> strictly relating to the fact that a judge has issued a TRO that forces an
> ISP (NAC) to allow a third-party, who WILL NOT be a Customer of NAC, to be
> able to use IP Space allocat
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
> No. This is a clear situation where the customer has canceled his service
> with us in writing.
Ok, important point.
> b) In regards to your passage, "because the customer just appears to be
> another multi-homed customer of yours", this is a key p
> Subject: Slides for NANOG31 IPsec tutorial
>
> If you plan to attend Sunday's hands-on tutorial for using the IPsec
> server at NANOG, you may want to have a look at the slides in
> advance. You can find them at: http://www.packet-pushers.net/NANOG/ipsec/
Unfortunately, I won't be there. But
Hi guys,
Is there anyone with a fiber drop or something around Penn Station in NYC? Or
some non T-Mobile wireless presence?
We're trying to get some bandwidth in the Pennsylvania Hotel in july, and I had
hoped to do this through T-Mobile's wireless, but that doesn't seem to be
an option they'
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, David Luyer wrote:
> Site Finder on its own added to spam; spam volumes increased as the number
> of "sender domain does not resolve" bounces dropped away.
That is a myth: http://www.xtdnet.nl/paul/spam/graphs/versign.png
If you want to blame spam on a single corporatin,
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, William Allen Simpson wrote:
> This is a feature, not a bug. Law enforcement is required to pay --
> up front -- all costs of tapping. No pay, no play.
Oh, I wish, I wish
In NL, law dictates any telecommunicatins device (as defined amongst things
as "anything with
Hi people,
Is there anyone from T-Mobile on this list? I'd like to talk to someone
about the New York City network for an event in July.
Cheers,
Paul
On 23 Sep 2003, Paul Vixie wrote:
> > Thought I'd mention that I helped setup BIND 9.2.3rc3 on a yellowdog
> > linux powercomputing machine tonight. It worked. And the mail queues
> > began clearing out. Just for an oddball success report.
>
> oh hell. thanks for the kind words, but we ju
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Scott McGrath wrote:
> Remember when you go to a library to study rare manuscripts you generally
> need to prove to the curator that you have a legitimate scholarly interest
> in the documents not simply random curiousity.
That's because those old manuscripts are fragile, no
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, N. Richard Solis wrote:
> There are some states that operate their own grids. Texas, for example.
Didn't know those chairs took that many megawats :)
Paul
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
> > Something I'm surprised no one has commented on considering the
> > direction of this thread has been should ISPs be responsible for
> > customer actions if they are not allowed to refuse service to customers?
>
> ISP's can't refuse service t
(Some more background on the Flashback censorship issue)
Paul
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 01:08:20 +0100
From: Zenon Panoussis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, batz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED
(Zenon isn't on Nanog and asked me to forward this)
Paul
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 20:59:06 +0100
From: Zenon Panoussis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, batz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROT
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:
> Just for the record, your story above is far from complete and not true
> on all accounts. It is also a quite simplified version of what
> happened.
Perhaps Zenon (Whom I cc:ed just because he knows the details) can
shed some more light on th
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:
> This has been a discussion item in the Swedish ISP business for quite
> some time (for a reason).
> The matter is actually a lot more complex than what you say above.
How ironic, would that be because of Flashback magazine? :)
For those who do
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Stephen Fisher wrote:
> I've seen people use shielded CAT5 to protect it from interference but
> they didn't bother grounding the shielding on either end
In the "me too" category, I've seen a company install wireless on top of
the Netherland's highest building (The Rembr
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, batz wrote:
> I suppose that any ISP can turn off a connection they deem
> a threat to the rest of their operations, but I think this
> incident can serve as an example of how ISP's can get dragged
> into political spats. It shows how Verio was manipulated
> by Dow to squelc
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> One Dutch ISP that shall remain unnamed (and is not one I work for or
> have worked for) deployed Extreme on AMS-IX, with Extreme's BGP
> implementation.
>
> It broke horribly.
Then again, AMSIX and their Foundry's break every other day as well :)
In
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Sabri Berisha wrote:
> > AMS-IX graphs seem to have a glitch, or one heck of a DDOS.
> > http://www.ams-ix.net/hugegraph.html
>
> This was a power outage.
I doubt the dip in the graph, which looks to me like about 1G missing
between 12:00-19:00 was just from that 3 second p
On Sat, 29 Jun 2002, Sean Donelan wrote:
> Sorry for interrupting our quarterly peering debate, but I'd like to
> ask if there are any groups for people who are Postmasters (abuse, spam,
> dmca, etc)? I know there are many groups for people who want to complain
> about those subjects, but I was
On Fri, 10 May 2002, Adam McKenna wrote:
> They've begun making the templates harder and harder to find. I don't know
> if this is on purpose (although I suspect it is).
Ofcourse it is. Only ask the admin-c (clueless client) for approval to
transfer (not the tech-c, whose email address actuall
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, J.D. Falk wrote:
> Spam has reached such epic porportions
Indeed. I recently plotted my entire spam collection from 1997-now,
and it looks like an exponential problem :(
See http://www.xtdnet.nl/paul/spam/
Paul
--
"One liners are no liners."
--- Fenrir
Three weeks, seven tickets, and nine operators later it looks like I might
actually have my host records NSG4447-HST and NSJ4375-HST updated in the
next 48 hours. That's only 20 days after I've sent the first form, and 11
days since that old IP has been disconnected.
In short my problem was tha
31 matches
Mail list logo
