Nathan Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Perhaps you could integrate your work with a project like pfsense?
From what I've seen, that's the best open source CPE solution, and
doesn't yet have real IPv6 support (but has just about everything
else).
That would be a huge benefit to the
James R. Cutler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am astounded at seeing this discussion. I have not seen this much
disavowing of CIDR addressing since 2003 or before.
To steal a phrase from Dave Rand, you're confused. Nobody is
disavowing CIDR, nor is anyone arguing against using the all-zeroes
Wayne E. Bouchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So my oppinion is don't hesistate to use it until you find a real,
reproducible problem.
Tell that to your call center manager. :-)
---rob
Patrick Clochesy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We could come up with a list or an updateable site, but it's bound to be
abused and thus ignored, the same reason people arn't sending to abuse@ and
postmaster@ in the first place.
If only there were some web site where someone could go to search
Gregory Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 21:42:21 -0500
From: Michael Greb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've got a user sending a lot of UDP traffic to 208.113.189.13 port 22.
This traffic is very likely undesirable and I'd be willing to pull the
plug immediately if I can get
Robert E. Seastrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gregory Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 21:42:21 -0500
From: Michael Greb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've got a user sending a lot of UDP traffic to 208.113.189.13 port 22.
This traffic is very likely undesirable and I'd
Mark Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 21:50:01 -0500
Robert E. Seastrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd really, really, really like to have DHCP6 on the Mac. Autoconfig
is not sufficient for this task unless there is some kind of trick you
can do to make the eui-64 come
Leo Bicknell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message written on Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 10:57:59PM +0100, Iljitsch van
Beijnum wrote:
It is wih IPv6: you just connect the ethernet cable and the RAs take
care of the rest. _You_ _really_ _don't_ _need_ _DHCP_ _for_ _IPv6_.
If you need
Chris Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Once upon a time, Owen DeLong [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I think it makes sense to assign as follows:
/64 for the average current home user.
/56 for any home user that wants more than one subnet
/48 for any home user that can show need.
Dumb question
Chris,
Those were straw-man numbers. The point is that eventually it all
becomes a commodity and mass-produced, and I'd like to see the stuff
that would be maximally useful to us be the commodity that benefits
most from the mass production. Hence my preference for the 10km optics.
A practical question here: does anyone know offhand if 4km reach is
adequate for interbuilding access (i.e., DC[124] to DC3) access at
Equinix Ashburn, including worst-case interior wiring and cross
connects? I'm thinking that's cutting it close. The enterprise
people are substantially less
Justin M. Streiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I haven't read the draft spec yet to see what's being proposed for a
link budget at 3/4/10km, but that's just as important as the physical
distance.
That's a really good point, and one which I didn't originally consider
pre-coffee. :-)
Link
.
---rob
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Robert E. Seastrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 5:06 AM
To: Justin M. Streiner
Cc: nanog@merit.edu; Chris Cole
Subject: Re: IEEE 40GE 100GE
Justin M. Streiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I haven't read
Deepak Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm on board with that as far as it goes, but has the scenario of
adjustable launch powers so that you don't ever need attenuators plus
the economy of scale that would come from having *one* type of
interface for 1m-10km runs been considered? It seems
that the NANOG mailing list accepted attachments.
Someone oughta fix that, heh.
Thanks,
---Rob
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Robert E. Seastrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 11:20 AM
To: Chris Cole
Cc: Justin M
Michael Painter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
michael's colleague writes:
Most ISP routers (and I have seen configs for over
1000 of them and only seen source route blocked on less then 10 of these!
[1]) do not filter source routing (ie no no ip source-route entry). As
a result, source
Barry Shein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
P.S. It's an interesting thought. The only approach to a solution I
could imagine is that the whole address would have to be passed in the
MX query.
Once upon a time (1987) there was this experimental facility called MB
(mailbox) records which did
Randy Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
no sc hat at all
the appended message earned me a formal complaint from the mlc.
No, it did not. It earned you a polite request from Marty to show
some leadership and not engage in off-topic personal sniping on the
list. When you asked if it was a
Randy Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
when i asked if it was formal, assuming it was so because it had been
cc:d to the sc ($deity knows why), rob said yes it could be taken that way.
I'm sorry that you misunderstood my communication; obviously I should
have laid it out more carefully. The
Jim Popovitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 18:46 -0400, Martin Hannigan wrote:
Just so we're clear, you will continue to see requests to adapt to the
AUP wrt to being on topic. If you don't like that, you can certainly
seek to have me thrown off the MLC. In fact, I
Randy Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
but i am certainly guilty of terseness and obscurity, as well as
confusing two ex-cseo of qwest. my apologies.
...
this would have been very clear as to the formality of the message, and
have allowed discussion and explantation.
Matthew 7:5
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ARIN has set up a wiki at http://www.getipv6.info to publish information
that will help ISPs, large and small in implementing IPv6 and migrating
to an IPv6 Internet.
The unintentionally funny part of this is that the wiki hangs (the
redirect to
Xin Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sorry for the confusion. Let me clarify.
We are interested in a number of questions:
1. Can we assume loosely synchronized router clocks in the Internet,
or we have to make absolutely no assumption about router clocks at
all?
Make no assumption.
2. If
Travis H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 03:48:18PM -0500, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
Lucy Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
and hard to read...
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/osmhome/allochrt.pdf
I had the same reaction at first.
Incidentally, you can get this for cheap from
With certain susceptible Sun CPUs which were popular during the last
sunspot maxima, this was actually demonstrably true (and acknowledged
by Sun), so don't laugh too hard.
---rob
Leigh Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Somebody form a certain large
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Same with buying a handgun in most states and in Canada. Same with
opening a business in most jurisdictions. You have to go to cityhall and
apply for a license first. Why should domain name registries be special
and be exempt from these normal processes of vetting
handled.
---rob
sean donelan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sorry about the general mail. Network operators
sometimes disappear into the ether. If anyone knows
how to contact Coloco or Doug Humphrey I'd appreciate
finding out how to get my server back
Alexander Harrowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One of my blog-related interests is the career of Russian arms dealer
Viktor Bout. I recently checked out the namebase.org social network
diagram for him...and was a little surprised to see where our very own
Paul Vixie comes in it.
Roland Dobbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mar 1, 2007, at 1:10 PM, Chris L. Morrow wrote:
So... again, are bogon filters 'in the core' useful? (call 'core' some
network not yours)
Antispoofing is 'static' and therefore brittle in nature, people
change jobs, etc. - so, we shouldn't do
Gadi Evron [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
Cat Okita [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Maybe I'm missing something here - I haven't seen Rob Seastrom send
any personal attacks to the list. Are you talking about private email?
If that's the case
Inasmuch as anyone with an ICBM (Intel-Chip-Based-Mac) has 802.11a
capability, and such devices have been gaining increasing traction
among geeks of late, I'm not surprised. The latest Airport Extreme
base station from Apple is A/B/G/N (the Express is still b/g).
Joe Abley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i thought it was actually covered on-list... during the event, no?
I don't think it was especially covered on this list (you are no
doubt thinking of other lists). There was a lightning talk about it
in Toronto, for which slides can be found in the usual
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do you know of any network operators who have no Solaris boxes at all
used in the management of some part of their network? Seems to me that
it is very common for network operators to use Solaris boxes to manage
their networks. And while they may have ACLs to
Lucy Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
and hard to read...
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/osmhome/allochrt.pdf
adhoc allocation taken to it's limits?
different frequencies of RF have different performance
characteristics. unlike ip addresses, a 1 mhz allocation at 180 mhz
and a 1 mhz allocation
Jamie Bowden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Entrances, ha. Anyone remember that railroad tunnel in Baltimore ?
And I am pretty sure that Fairfax County isn't much better.
We have a railroad tunnel in Fairfax?
single points of failure, like f'rinstance collapsed backbone segments
on boone blvd.
Joel Jaeggli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is it just me or is this article a migraine inducing mix of metric and
English measures?
you're lucky they also didn't use nautical miles and fathoms (1.829
meters in si units)...
Leagues... mustn't forget leagues.
Edward Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The #10 google search in the Who Is category (leading off with
Borat, Hezbollah, EU, hot, ...) is IP Who Is.
I'm not sure what to make of that. Has google replaced the whois client?
Well, the article talks about people using myspace as a search term,
Edward Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yeah, granted anyone looking for myspace might meet that demographic,
but how many neophytes would use Google for a IP Who Is search?
That's the listing I thought odd.
There would be very few of them if it weren't for spam.
no, he's saying that a lawsuit is a useful method of forcing someone
who is intentionally or negligently distributing incorrect information
that other people who do not know any better then believe and use in
their own networks.
i betcha libel laws aren't written in such a way that they are
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BTW, the speed of light in fibre is roughly equal to
the speed of electrons in copper and roughly equal to
two-thirds the speed of light in a vacuum. You just
can't move information faster than about 200,000 km/hr.
Slow day at work, Michael? In my universe light
Very little here that we don't already know:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061122/ap_on_go_ot/passports_air_travel
*except* for the bit in the third from last paragraph about the
startlingly large percentages (between 25 and 42%) of Americans
traveling to Canada, Mexico, and the Caribbean who
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 09:26:13AM -0500, Robert Boyle wrote:
At 09:23 AM 11/9/2006, you wrote:
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006, Robert Boyle wrote:
You should also create a bogons list for your BGP routes which you
accept from your upstream. Block all RFC1918 space and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Steve's 100% spot-on here. I don't have bogon filters at all and it
hasn't hurt me in the least. I think the notion that this is somehow
a good practice needs to be quashed.
Some people don't use condoms with hookers either. Just because they
haven't caught
Niels Bakker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert E. Seastrom) [Thu 09 Nov 2006, 16:02 CET]:
[..]
Steve's 100% spot-on here. I don't have bogon filters at all and it
hasn't hurt me in the least. I think the notion that this is
somehow a good practice needs to be quashed
You may have heard that the US and Canada are going to start requiring
passports for air travel between them beginning soon. That date is
currently set as 8 Jan 2007, which is before February NANOG. MERIT
has noted this on the web site, but a cursory check of my list
archives didn't turn up
Fearghas McKay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 11:29 -0400 15/10/06, vijay gill wrote:
Is this your final answer? I've used AC power in lufthansa business
class. Makes the 8 or 9 hour trip back to the states much more
ditto KLM Business class in a 777.
ditto NW in a 74.
Fascinating... of course, you can see where the confusion came from,
particularly given the source of some of the components and the fact
that they're not actually committed until they get the orders (hence,
no satellite capacity online _today_). Thanks for the additional
data; I'm sure
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Renesys Todd thinks Panasonic is buying the thing.
As I understand it, Panasonic's product is different, cheaper, and not
a turnkey service (they don't have their own satellite transponder
constellation). It is aimed at nation-states, not the commercial
market.
Jeff Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Supposedly there is a www.nic.mil as well, but it doesn't seem to be
accessible from my location currently.
DoDNIC Help Desk:
1-800-365-3642
1-614-692-2708
---rob
Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Duh. Did you ever read the numbers for Connexion? They managed to design a
system which cost the airlines up to $1mil per plane to install, and only
generated $80k/yr/plane total revenue (thats Boeing revenue not airline
revenue). They had
Rick Kunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can anyone tell me the standard way to deal with patch panels, racks, and
switches in a data center used for colocation?
Network Cabling Handbook by Chris Clark is a bit dated (5 years old)
but probably should be on your bookshelf anyway, particularly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, Joshua Brewer wrote:
What about when we're seeing this on port 25?
Sand worms.
In all seriousness, your guess is as good as mine, at that point. If
memory serves, the platforms we saw this on most, with web browsers, were
mobile devices.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Network operator discovers that measures taken to mitigate
an old network security measure, long past their sell-by
date, are now causing random grief. Seems to me like
bang on topic for NANOG.
Agreed. Rare that people do haircuts on router configs; they're
I'm not picking on William here; his message was just the last I saw
in this thread which has gotten way out of hand.
I have not discussed this thread with my fellow list admin team
members either, though we can do that...
But it would make our (the list admin team's) lives easier, as well as
This is kind of a disgrace. Hopefully public mention of it will cause
repairs to happen.
---Rob
---BeginMessage---
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent has not yet been delivered to one or more of its
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I left for several hours and came back to the house stinking like burning
rubber. The new batteries are apparently melting the terminal rubber
insulation. I had to throw it back into bypass mode and unplug that pack
(the only one with new batteries!)
By terminal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've had this APC Matrix 5000 with 3 XR battery packs for almost 6 years
As others on the list have noted, your batteries are almost certainly
ready to head off to the battery recycler.
In terms of what to put inside the XR packs, they're Group 24 AGM
batteries,
Christopher L. Morrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
Come on Sean, this very few disruptions stuff is below your usual
standards. The least you can do to help us pass the time in this damn heat
is to recount a few good stories about routers you
Mark Jeftovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So how about publishing some SPF data on your earthlink.net domain so
...
Same goes for comcast.
...
It's all but eliminated the backscatter we send to hotmail. If they
can do it
ditto Cox (guys... adelphia and roadrunner could do this, why
Gerry Boudreaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is not VeriSign this time.
It is not even remotely the same as SiteFinder either. It requires
people to make a conscious decision to use different nameservers than
the ones they're currently using, and is likely to get the same or
less level of
Joe Abley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 29-Jun-2006, at 14:25, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
We're looking to acquire a couple small servers that can act as
routers for
us at remote locations.
How small? :-)
http://www.compulab.co.il/x270/html/x270-cm-datasheet.htm
He wants x86; those are
vijay gill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Matthew Petach wrote:
Robert Seastrom--should you do v6 at all?
Should you be a pioneer, and make the v6 people
happy, sure, do it; if you want to make money,
no.
I think Alain from comcast had a different take on it.
The specific context was should
As promised in the nanog-37 community meeting, here's a summary of
monthly traffic from 1999 to present. The disclaimer here is that
these numbers are approximate, as they are based on the date stamps on
files in an mh-format mail directory, i.e. they're based on the time I
fired up the mail
401 North Broad, not West Broad - Broad runs N/S.
It's not comparable with 60 Hudson, more like 165 Halsey, both in
quality of the installation and character of the neighborhood.
Haven't been in 1 Wilshire.
401 North Broad is the carrier hotel in Philly though... unless
you're using Amtrak
M. David Leonard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What is to prevent a network from providing unjittered NTP to its
downstream clients/customers BUT jittered NTP to outsiders? How is this
different from providing up-to-the-millisecond stock exchange data to
paying customers but delaying the same
Matt Ghali [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Companies behaving irresponsibly and releasing (selling!) code that
abuses a shared public resource should not be the norm.
The addresses that are configured into shipping Apple products for NTP are:
time.apple.com
time.asia.apple.com
Hegger, Stefan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hope not bothering you but I'm looking for some experiences with IPS
systems. There are several vendors but is there a recommandation or some
tests? As Service provider we need a system which handles the scanning
in hardware and it should work as a
Martin Hannigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It may not be so clear cut. Check out Mark Jeftovic, a trusted source
on DNS information, and a director of CIRA:
http://blog.easydns.org/archives/60-China-Top-Level-Domain-news-possibly-not-news..html
It has become clearer after trading a
Glen Kent [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For example, an ISP can learn two different equal cost routes to a
foo.com server via two different autonomous domains. It can thus split
different flows (based on src-dest IP, src-dest Port, TOS, etc) across
these two paths.
Do operators currently do
Christopher L. Morrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Robert E.Seastrom wrote:
Glen Kent [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For example, an ISP can learn two different equal cost routes to a
foo.com server via two different autonomous domains. It can thus split
different flows
Joe Abley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 24-Jan-2006, at 12:07, Robert E.Seastrom wrote:
He said via two different autonomous domains, which I took to mean
two upstreams... and my understanding is that (on ciscos anyway)
you're talking per-packet, not per-flow load balancing.
If you can get
Joe Abley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 24-Jan-2006, at 13:09, Robert E.Seastrom wrote:
Joe Abley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you can get two candidate routes for the same destination into the
FIB, then you'll get per-flow load balancing as long as CEF is
running, no?
Yes and no. CEF
Jim Popovitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jerry Pasker wrote:
The point is: What's more damaging? Being open with the maps to
EVERYONE can see where the problem areas are so they can design
around them? (or chose not to) or pulling the maps, and reports, and
sticking our heads in the sand,
Matt Ghali [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hear Hear.
After reading the GoDaddy domain registration legal agreement,
available at:
https://www.godaddy.com/gdshop/legal_agreements/show_doc.asp?se=%2Bci=1839pageid=REG%5FSA
especially section 7, Restriction of Services, Right of Refusal, I
have to
Henry Yen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In (at least) the Long Island, NY market, Verizon FTTH/FIOS installers
physically cut and decommission the copper upon fiber install.
Bye-bye DSL competition. Since they won't bring back the copper
even you don't like the FIOS service, it's permanent.
Ben Butler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anyone got any comments about how good or otherwise the Cisco 7200 +
NPE-G1 or 7301, both with 1GB of RAM, is as a eBGP router + L2TP
terminator for DSL subs, in terms of scalability for bandwidth through
put the number of VPDN sessions it can terminate
Randy Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
but it will be a classic. if you can get and edit it, send
it to boing boing or /.
Pearls before swine.
In my rss aggregator, boingboing and /. are labeled a Directory for
Dilettantes and News for Goobers respectively.
Please pardon the crossposting between ppml and nanog...
Geoff Huston [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why /48 rather than /47 or /49? - alignment to nibble boundaries to
make DNS delegation easier.
It has recently come to my attention that we are in error when we
expect n[iy]bble to have the same
Nils Ketelsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ben Butler wrote:
if anyone had a view on what would happen if I managed to source an
SDRAM of 512MB / 1GB of the same specification as the 256MB Cisco
compatible memory that you use in an 7200 NPE225. Cisco say the maximum
ram for that NPE is a
Moore will likely have to continue to produce the solution.
What happens if he can't? Silicon technology *is* topping out. What
happens to v6 if every single household and business on the planet
decides to multihome?
I often wonder what would happen if IETF and NANOG were to
collectively
Hannigan, Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Oct 6, 2005, at 10:34 AM, Peter R. wrote:
On 10/1/05, Cogent's network (AS174 -- a very old network)
originated the equivalent of 1x /8 + 1x /9 -- that's 1.67% of the
ends that constitute the global end-to-end network that we call
Pekka Savola [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
er... the first depeering flaps have -already- occured in IPv6
space. there are several (mostly EU-based) ISPs that refuse to
peer w/ folks using 3ffe:: space and/or filter that prefix.
Sabri Berisha [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To get
an understanding of routing-protocols, begin with RIP[3] and perhaps
run your own RIP-lab
necromancy will be severely punished.
---rob
Matthew Crocker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Everything looks like it is configured properly on my servers but the
customer is reporting that certain parents (VerizonDSL, Comcast,
DirectWAY) can connect to certain website and not others. At this
point I think the problem is with the DNS
Matthew Crocker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yeah, yeah, that is overrated. If my site goes dark and my DNS goes
down it doesn't really matter as the bandwidth and the web server
will also be down. Having a live DNS server in another part of the
country won't help if the access routers
Mikael Abrahamsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Randy Bush wrote:
Would it be improper to suggest that you pick a different acronym? :-)
yes it would be.
everything in language A has a strange connotation in some other
language B. e.g., my name is great fun in
Marshall Eubanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am I the only one who feels that an NDA, even an NDA with a vendor, is an
agreement that should be honored ?
I know they are silly in many case, but still...
We certainly wish for our vendors to honor *their* NDAs with us, don't
we? RIRs come
Todd Vierling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Seriously, though, that's exactly what you're describing, and about what I'd
suggest in a no-other-option scenario -- but if it's possible to pull fiber
through the conduits, it would probably be far less expensive long term, or
even medium term if
Joseph S D Yao [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dave,
I think the mail gateways back when the various networks were being put
together into an internet had as their functional purpose unifying
disparate networks. On the contrary, a firewall has as its purpose
partitioning a network that
Israel, David B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, my practical solution to this one is max-prefixing your peers.
It means you have to watch your peers slow growth, but frankly, you
should be watching that anyway.
Max-prefix is part of the battle.
A corollary max-aggregate where for
Stephen J. Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
wheres the ops in this?
dont get me wrong, i'm sympathetic with new orleans and also
definitely not a bush supporter but this is verging on incitement
and i dont see the point of the post to here
My guess: someone who doesn't like Paul (and
Network Fortius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anybody having any idea why such a high packet loss on lever3's
network, in Chicago?
End-user misinterpreting output from MTR. This network does not
appear to have any packet loss end-to-end.
---Rob
Stef:~
Howard, W. Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do carrier ISPs classify their voice traffic as Really
Important, and everybody else's data as Best Effort? This
isn't just selfishness, since We All Know voice is less
tolerant of latency and jitter than TCP.
We do?
Try to keep a
David Hagel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Would there be any data out there on what fraction from this 60ms to
80ms RTT is raw propagation delay and what fraction is typical packet
queuing delay at intermediate switches? Does queuing delay play much
of a role at all these days? Or is it all
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am going to be cutting over about 75,000 DSL lines from
one core network to another. Does anyone have
recommendations on subnet and DHCP scope size? If I make
them /23s I have to do about 145 subents. If I make them
/22s I only have to do
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If not, once again, I'd ask you to cite sources rather
than make broad sweeping statements about what is already available.
Appealing to some anonymous authority in order to claim the sky is
falling is hardly endearing.
I think that people who specialise in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We should all be looking to the security auditing work done by
the OpenBSD team for an example of how systems can be
cleaned up, fixed, and locked down if there is a will to do so.
Beer, unsupported assertions, and lack of rigorous audit methodology
can be blended
OK, not really in the core, but the subject made you look at least. :)
I'm interested in people's experiences with consumer-grade routers
functioning in non-NAT mode; that is to say, running PPPoE to the ISP
and routing a /29 or a /28. A sane filtering language and stateful
firewall that can
Stephane Bortzmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Already, some 21 TLDs are whitelisted, including .cn, .tw, a number
of European ccTLDs, .museum, and .info. Any other registrars who
want to be supported can simply E-mail Gerv at the Mozilla
Foundation, or his Opera counterpart, and give them a
Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There were lower levels of priority that you could also use,
but flash was the top one that I heard about.
The four buttons on the 1633 row of an AUTOVON telephone are labeled
P, I, F, and FO for Priority, Immediate, Flash, and Flash-Override.
The
1 - 100 of 189 matches
Mail list logo
