RE: BGP Anywhere - Global Redundancy

it be ok as my direct peer ISP wont (shouldn't) drop the /24? -=Vandy=- -Original Message- From: Bill Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 10:01 PM To: Vandy Hamidi Subject: Re: BGP Anywhere - Global Redundancy Depending on what your address space

BGP Anywhere - Global Redundancy

All, We're an ASP and are considering adding a secondary Backup Datacenter (BDC) in the US to protect our web presence. My goal is to ensure automatic failover of my Primary DC's (IP) traffic to the BDC in the event of a catastrophic failure of the PDC. I'm considering geographic load

RE: BGP Anywhere - Global Redundancy

this. Anyone from UltraDNS? -=Vandy=- -Original Message- From: Steve Gibbard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 5:48 PM To: Vandy Hamidi Cc: nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: BGP Anywhere - Global Redundancy On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Vandy Hamidi wrote: All

Goofle/Sprint having problems?

My offices that use Sprint are having timeouts and major slowdowns to www.google.com Traceroute shows it going through reach.com and that is where the slowdown is occurring. See hop 11 below. Tracing route to www.google.akadns.net [216.239.57.103] over a maximum of 30 hops: 11 ms1 ms

RE: Goofle/Sprint having problems?

PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 2:01 PM Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Goofle/Sprint having problems? On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Vandy Hamidi wrote: My offices that use Sprint are having timeouts and major

RE: Goofle/Sprint having problems?

:38 PM Subject: RE: Goofle/Sprint having problems? On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Vandy Hamidi wrote: Yeah, a visual route just showed my trace going to AUS and then Singapore. Hmm... You think Google is going to be pissed when they find out their site was being routed to Asia? Heads

RE: Backbone Infrastructure and Secrecy

http://www.thebunker.net/ -Original Message- From: Eric Kuhnke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 3:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Backbone Infrastructure and Secrecy I recall reading, last year, about a Cyber Bunker outside London UK which is being

Why can't I default Originate?

Platform: Cisco 7206VXR SW: Version 12.2(15)T2 router#sh run | b bgp router bgp 65011 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes bgp confederation identifier 12345 bgp confederation peers 65001 65021 bgp deterministic-med

RE: Why can't I default Originate?

PROTECTED] Cell: (978) 394-2867 On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:43:35PM -0700, Vandy Hamidi wrote: Platform: Cisco 7206VXR SW: Version 12.2(15)T2 router#sh run | b bgp router bgp 65011 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes bgp confederation

RATE-Limiting and

QOS tagging and queuing would have to be involved. -=Vandy=- -Original Message- From: Jack Bates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 4:43 AM To: Andy Dills Cc: Vandy Hamidi; prue; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Newbie network upgrade question, apologies

RE: RATE-Limiting and

. Scott M, do you think the Microflow policer you referred to can limit traffic based on individual flows within a defined range (acl)? -=Vandy=- -Original Message- From: Scott McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 12:53 PM To: Vandy Hamidi Cc: Jack Bates

RE: Newbie network upgrade question, apologies in advance to NANOG

Also, you may want to set your border router (the one with the serials to your ISP) to route per packet as opposed to allowing the routes to cache. This will distribute the bandwidtch evenly across your T1's. If you don't, then a single high traffic session or destination can consume an

IRR/RADB and BGP

Title: Message Our new ISPis asking that I create a maintainer object in the RADB and associated AS/Routes for us to be about to eBGP peer. This is the first time I've been asked by a provider to do this for something as simple as peering to advertise a couple /24's. I've peered with ATT,

RE: Testing BGP with real UPDATEs

If you are testing the receipt of routes and inbound filtering, I just block all outbound advertisements and connect to an ISP or one of my border routers. That way you can test your filters and inbound access-lists and manipulate the BGP tables before putting the router into production. Hope

RE: how is cold-potato done?

From what I've experience on Cisco routers. The RID isn't the final deciding factor, it has been the route that was first present. I had a router peering with 10.0.0.6 and 10.0.0.7 and if I reset BGP on .6 the .7 route will stick and even though .6 comes back up the .7 route will stay. BGP