-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm looking for pointers (forum) regarding purchasing dark fiber. At the
same time can anyone point me in the right direction regarding
purchasing dark fiber in Bombay, India.
tia,
- --
regards,
/virendra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bill Nash wrote:
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not just bypass them and go direct to the unwashed
masses of end users? Offer them a free windows
infection blocker program that imposes the quarantine
itself locally on the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thanks for taking notes.
comments in-line:
Matthew Petach wrote:
2006.02.14 talk 2 Netflow tools
Bill Yurcik
byurcik at ncsa.uiuc.edu
NVisionIP and VisFlowConnect-IP
probably a dozen tools out there, this is just
two of them. Concenses
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Jeroen Massar wrote:
I Ar Es,
At least they have received the 2610:30::/32 allocation from ARIN.
Lets see if they how taxing they find IPv6 ;)
so.. this is surprising why? the us-gov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hmm..I thought (correct me if I wrong) wsus followed a mirror
(distributed) model say if a group of servers were pegged the update
process would provide remote clients access to the closet and min
latency host(s) in order to distribute the load
.
- ---
true enough.
Or maybe I'm just missing the point of this thread.
- -
You might want to take a look at rfc 2804 for some background.
regards,
/virendra
Flounder
Vicky Rode wrote:
comments in-line:
Peter Dambier wrote:
Vicky Rode wrote:
...Raising
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
They could be possible rate-limiting it. That's why tools such as mtr
and others do not necessarily tell you the whole truth.
regards,
/virendra
Elijah Savage wrote:
Jon Lewis wrote:
I was trying to get some IOS and compare a few images in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
comments in-line:
Peter Dambier wrote:
Vicky Rode wrote:
...Raising my hand.
My question is on Terry Hartle's comments, maybe someone with more
insight into this could help clear my confusion.
Why would it require to replace every router
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/25/AR2005102501807.html
or
By Arshad Mohammed
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, October 26, 2005; Page D01
New federal wiretapping rules that would make it easier for law
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just taking a quick poll to see if nanog community would consider this
a worthwhile effort to pursue?
regards,
/virendra
- Original Message
Subject: Re: FCC Outage Reports ..(.was Verizon outage in Southern
California?)
Date:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I wonder what ever happened to redundancy? I guess 5 9s (dunno what the
going number is) got blown out of the water for them.
regards,
/virendra
David Lesher wrote:
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
I'm not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Apparently there was a software glitch in the switch(s) which disrupted
route calls.
regards,
/virendra
Hannigan, Martin wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matthew Black
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 3:13 PM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
well, if the existing discussion is not enough, cisco has an interesting
article out...see /. for more information.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/about/ac123/ac147/archived_issues/ipj_8-3/ipv4.html
wearing my flame suite :-)
regards,
/virendra
insight will be appreciated.
regards,
/vicky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDOHZ1pbZvCIJx1bcRAihfAJwLF026eea0TxIt5nww7/jCr4YBxQCg57M/
zTUBKD1pkuE7S3NHnjqyqPU=
=lWUk
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Just wondering if anyone has any links and /or price matrix for colos?
Any pointers will be appreciated.
regards,
/vicky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
this is a good start for me...i'll take it from here :-)
regards,
/vicky
Paul Vixie wrote:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vicky Rode) writes:
|
|
|Just wondering if anyone has any links and /or price matrix for colos?
|
|Any pointers will be appreciated
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Has anyone (a) experienced or noticed issues related to this
vulnerability (b) what action(s) have you taken to address this, if any?
What do folks at verisign and isc think about this?
Any insight will be appreciated.
regards,
/vicky
Fergie
regards,
/vicky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCf6hJpbZvCIJx1bcRAsSiAKC1hRB4epeMef3FAxeC9/dSbfju9gCfSASO
OUOZb1US1CLLZ8w/W5n1lnc=
=v32F
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
in this area. Didn't get much
feedback.
regards,
/vicky
|
| -Dan
|
| [0]Idiots With Firewalls. See http://urchin.earth.li/cgi-bin/ecn.pl
|
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
are the devices coping up
with filters in place, if any?
Like to hear what nanog community and the people who are involved w/
internet2 connectivity think.
Any insight and /or pointers to any papers will be appreciated.
regards,
/vicky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I made that up :-)
Basically I meant to say not congested as the current Internet is.
regards,
/vicky
Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
| On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Vicky Rode wrote:
|
|
|In general, how are they protecting themselves from malicious code
|infection
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
since you deviated from my original post...
http://www.icir.org/floyd/ccmeasure.html
regards,
/vicky
Daniel Roesen wrote:
| On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 02:07:15PM -0700, Vicky Rode wrote:
|
|Basically I meant to say not congested as the current Internet
, checkout, http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2481.html
regards,
/vicky
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Hi,
|
| Is anyone using the DSCP ECN bits to any great extent? Does it require
| end-host support in the stack to actually work?
|
| Cheers,
| Christian
|
|
|
| This message and any attachments (the message
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://software.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=05/04/06/197203from=rss
Just wondering how many have transitioned to djbdns from bind and if so
any feedback.
regards,
/vicky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thanks for the insight to all who responded.
regards,
/vicky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mark,
You are not alone. I've had problems even as a member :-)
I'll try and ping someone there and see what I can do.
Feel free to contact me directly if need be.
regards,
/virendra
Mark Newton wrote:
| I need to talk to someone who can update the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It depends.
If your device(s) was part of the change management notification then
that's correct.
regards,
//virendra//
Luke Parrish wrote:
| Trying to get clarification on an issue.
|
| Maintenance/outage window is 2:00AM to 5:00AM, during the window
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Why even bother responding. Just imagine frontbridge (using them an
example, I have no affiliation with them) responding to each and every
spam they block..something like 7 terrabytes of data per week or so. I
guess this is one way to justify for more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
Just wondering if there is any way I could use a scanner (I have a home
grown script for this) that would go thru the DNS registries from some
public source, scan for keywords in the domain name.
Anything that is available only to ISP's and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
Just wondering if there are any pool of public accessible (read-only)
snmp enabled devices that one can access for testing purposes (such as
snmpwalk, polling devices via oid/mib, graphing chart..etc)?
I'm looking for a pool of devices that I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
in-line:
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
| Vicky Rode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
|
|not sure if spiders falls under spam or ddos bracket when they
|repeatedly start hammering one's network. you could possible report to
|spamcop (*grin*) to get a quicker
and /or linked to a
master file as opposed to upgrading the ios?
like to hear more thoughts on it.
regards,
/vicky
|
| - jared
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFB7
this incident, http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~plonka/netgear-sntp/
regards,
/vicky
Dan Hollis wrote:
| On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
|
|On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:30:04 +0200, Gadi Evron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
|Inktomi (now Yahoo!) sends it's spiders all over the Internet. Lately
|some
it have a
| positive impact on overall net performance if everyone just turned off
| all internetwork status polling?
- -
depends on the polling period.
regards,
/vicky
|
| ducking
|
| -Jim P.
|
|
|
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=53700951
regards,
/vicky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBpMpOpbZvCIJx1bcRAqFmAJ96505uhm2Ipg
how to 'waste' bandwidth and
storage in order to conserve 'scarce' computing in this new world of
inverted values, said Smarr.
i'm not even sure why even implement mpls where latency/congestion is
not an issue specially in this case or even talking about I2 for that
matter.
regards,
/vicky
Deepak Jain
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ietfreport is timing outhere's another url for this draft.
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-baker-diffserv-basic-classes-04.txt
interesting read at:
http://qbone.internet2.edu/papers/non-architectural-problems.txt
regards,
/vicky
Sean
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
...also look into IMA (inverse multiplex atm).
regards,
/vicky
Gerald wrote:
| I've got what seems to me like an innocuous question for this list...
|
| Someone is requesting access to about 3 mb of traffic up/dn. I figure 2
| T1s will give them the 3
Hi there,
Just wondering if there's anyone who can recommend a layer 2 trace
utility similar to l2trace on a cisco switch but one that runs on a
linux box?
Any help will be appreciated.
regards,
/vicky
Currently this appliance supports the following qos components w/ 45mbps
support on eth0 and eth1:
-- shaping
-- buffering
-- policing
Any pointers to white papers, similar deployment, lesson learned or
simply your feedback will be appreciated.
regards,
/vicky
provider and / or your internal
traffic is not being over-book?
Any recommendations, thoughts, white papers, pointers will be greatly
appreciated.
regards,
/vicky
interesting reading
http://mail.internet2.edu:8080/guest/archives/qbone-arch-dt/log200205/msg0.html
regards,
/vicky
Edward B. Dreger wrote:
GC Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 16:53:17 -0400
GC From: Gordon Cook
GC The point I am making in my report is NOT that the best
GC effort network has
I'm interested in hearing people's view points on this as well. In
general what do folks thing about implementing yet another appliance
within their networks as opposed to implementing the same features (if
supported by their gear vendor) within their choke points.
regards,
/vicky
Matt Bazan
in setting this up.
Subscribe:
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/nsp-qos
regards,
/vicky
Hi there,
Just wondering why was my e-mail thread (Hierarchical Credit-based
Queuing (HCQ): QoS) dated 5/9/2004 9:36 PM reported as a spam? Just
trying to understand so that I don't repeat it. Below is a cut and paste
of the reported incident.
Please advice.
regards,
/vicky
cut here
the TOS bits
unless I pay them extra for the feature. The above scenario is a point
to point connection to a remote site.
Any insight will be appreciated.
regards,
/vicky
Hi,
Do you know by default if the routers pass the TOS bits?
regards,
/vicky
Scott McGrath wrote:
The answer is it depends. routers _usually_ honor the TOS bits unless
they are configured to clear or rewrite them. We use the TOS bits for
designating traffic classes so in some cases we rewrite
recommend a qos forum which I can ping as well.
Any insight will be appreciated.
regards,
/vicky
Hi Todd,
sorry about the late responseyes in fact i am using my own dns servers
w/o any problems (knock on wood)time warner think its their cable modem
box but i think its a caching issue on there end.
regards,
/vicky
-Original Message-
From: Todd Mitchell - lists [mailto
Hi Jay,
comments in-line:
-Original Message-
From: Jay Hennigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 10:22 PM
To: Vicky Rode
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: has anyone notice this ?
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Vicky Rode wrote:
It would be easier to troubleshoot
and they are
experiencing similar problems. is this socal.rr.com related or other regions
are expediting same problems too. time warner's network status page shows
everything is okay.
regards,
/vicky
Hi Jay,
see comments in-line:
-Original Message-
From: Jay Hennigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 4:09 PM
To: Vicky Rode
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: has anyone notice this ?
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Vicky Rode wrote:
just wondering has anyone noticed
Hi David,
i'm just couple feet away from my box. i'm currently using wireless and even
tried wired with same results. the fact others are experiencing similar
problems makes me believe the problem could be on time warner end, possible
caching issue.
regards,
/vicky
-Original Message
-Original Message-
From: Chan, KaLun
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 4:18 PM
To: Chan, KaLun; DL NOC Managers; DL NOC-IP Services
Cc: Eisenhart, William; Minter, Daniel; DL Neteng-core-ip
Subject: RE: [ARIN-20030123.943] 69.3.0.0/Covad - who had this block before?
All,
It has
Hi there,
What really confuses the heck out of me is that a company this size can't
control/monitor their change management??. Then again not having all the
facts has had everyone perplexed.
later,
vicky
At 07:38 PM 10/5/2002 -0400, you wrote:
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Tim Thorne wrote:
After
55 matches
Mail list logo
