where one could end up
sending tunneled packets to a PE which isn't able to receive and process them
correctly.
Thanks,
- Mark
Regards,
-- Enke
* From: W. Mark Townsley
* Date: Mon Mar 15 13:19:37 2004
Please see inline.
Yakov Rekhter wrote
Please see inline.
Yakov Rekhter wrote:
Mark,
i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547)
service without needing to run label switching in the
core(LDP/TDP/RSVP) but straight IP (aka iMPLS).
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-townsley-l2tpv3-mpls-01.txt
See also Mark's
Yakov Rekhter wrote:
No, I was *not* referring to draft-raggarwa-ppvpn-tunnel-encap-sig-03.txt.
Redback's implementation that does not require manual provisioning of
point-to-point GRE tunnels between MPLS networks and to each and every
IP-only reachable PE is *purely* an implementation
David Meyer wrote:
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 10:02:10AM -0800, Yakov Rekhter wrote:
Dave,
Hey Suki,
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 02:14:20PM -0800, sonet twister wrote:
Hello,
i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547)
service without needing to run label switching in the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 17:54:44 EDT, Steve Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Gosh, oh golly-gee, do you really think that they would do something
like that (planting a story)?
Well, officially, we've decided that we don't do disinformation:
