acid, fire dept was called, and building
was evacuated. From what I hear no loss of service however. I'm not
on-site but this is what I'm hearing.
--chip
--
Just my $.02, your mileage may vary, batteries not included, etc
Chris Owen wrote:
On Oct 17, 2006, at 1:36 PM, David Ulevitch wrote:
Anyone else seeing these failures? WorldNIC does a lot of
authoritative DNS
We've got several customer domains in the same boat.
I can ping those addresses but they don't seem to be answering queries.
I called'em a
, yadda.
--chip
--
Just my $.02, your mileage may vary, batteries not included, etc
Edward B. DREGER wrote:
MA Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:31:56 +0100 (CET)
MA From: Mikael Abrahamsson
MA The current routing model doesn't scale. I don't want to sit 5 years from
MA now needing a router that'll handle 8 million routes to get me through the
MA next 5 years of route growth.
American Network Operators Group
-ChanServ- Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-ChanServ- Options: Secure, SecureOps
-ChanServ- Mode Lock: -s
--chip
-- Just my $.02, your mileage may vary,batteries not included, etc
only
gives you an idea of where to begin troubleshooting.
--chip
-- Just my $.02, your mileage may vary,batteries not included, etc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerry Boudreaux wrote:
mtr shows the packet loss in the last hop for me:
14. sjck-dmzbb-gw1.cisco.com 0.0%
62 66.6 75.4 64.5 293.7 37.1
15. sjck-dmzdc-gw2.cisco.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florian Weimer wrote:
* Stephen J. Wilcox:
packet inspection will just evolve, thats the nature of this
problem.. there are things you can find out from encrypted flows -
what the endpoints and ports are, who the CA is. then you can look
at the
, valid, external, atomic-aggregate
11608 3491 1668 10796 {11060,12262}, (aggregated by 10796 24.95.80.203)
207.246.129.14 from 207.246.129.14 (207.246.129.14)
Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external, atomic-aggregate
Community: 11608:1006 11608:550
--chip
--
Just my $.02, your
. This can save huge amounts of
time when bad things happen and this applies no matter how large or
small you are.
--chip
--
Just my $.02, your mileage may vary, batteries not included, etc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Off list?
Thanks kindly.
(Second NANOG list request for this).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFC3OTw0STXFHxUucwRAtyAAJ4iwZepou65McfaQ7sIjsFqAJK2ngCdHW9R
NPDDT5gUcIUuV3maRgCFrLM=
=yw2W
-END PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
off list.
Thanks kindly.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFC06pU0STXFHxUucwRArO7AJ9L3dUEs9iluwWFTUAl0EsIjNnKsQCdFcxJ
8b9r0X5LN0zMGW+Euw5PRtY=
=c4xA
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Spencer Wood wrote:
This is kind of off topic, so please feel free to delete if you want
grin..
Anyway, in our NOC we current have two LCD projectors displaying outputs
from two different computers. On one of the display's, I would like to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joe Loiacono wrote:
|
|
|
|
| So imagine a residential area all pulling digital video over wireless.
| Sound familiar? Ironically close to TV! (yet so different)
You mean like VoIP over dsl ?
Burning gigantic holes in the bandwidth to carry traffic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joe Maimon wrote:
|
| Is there still justification for denying transit for ms-sql slammer ports?
on my at work small network, slammer (or slammer like) traffic is
still around 2% of inbound blocked traffic. (just a dead end off
of asn 6467)
-BEGIN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You mean those of us who ARE private isps?
Probably doing what we are doing today, reacting to the
enviroment.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCgl5b0STXFHxUucwRAjlIAJ4wxqmzrBbV8tqemqPwyQsqHnhY2wCgpbX4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Bonomi wrote:
|From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 26 12:37:15 2005
|Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 13:35:31 -0500
|From: Eric Gauthier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|To: Fergie (Paul Ferguson) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Cc: nanog@merit.edu
|Subject: Re: Clearwire May Block
Hello,
Could someone with BGP clue from AS 577 please contact me off list
regarding sourcing space that doesn't belong to you.
Thanks,
Chip Gwyn
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
Just my $.02, your mileage may vary, batteries not included, etc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
| On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 09:00:11PM -0500, Sean Donelan wrote:
|
|Sendmail now includes Port 587, although some people disagree how
|its done. But Exchange and other mail servers are still difficult
|for system
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
|
| Yes, this _is_ much worse. :-/
|
| Thinking out loud here, but one's imagination runs
| wild at the prospect of how much it will take before
| more credence is given to a serious top-to-bottom security
|
and matching filter for each
mailing-list...make's thing nice and sorted automatically. Your Gmail
acc't can be accessed via rss too, so there's that.
--chip
Just my $.02, your mileage may vary, batteries not included, etc
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 17:48:07 +0100, Jeroen Massar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 11:36 -0500, chip wrote:
SNIP
Try pointing your subscription to Gmail.
Why the peep would I want to rely on a service provider like Gmail or
Hotmail or whatever for something as as important
We've been getting alot of questions about Cox and Verio peering today.
Anyone know of something specific going on?
Thanks,
Chip Gwyn
+-+
| Chip Gwyn |
| Network
initiatives.]
I believe RBL will list open proxies.
Another good resource is the Blitzed Open Proxy Monitor (BOPM)
http://www.blitzed.org/bopm/.
--
Chip Rosenthal * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.unicom.com/
Lawsuit Update: I Win, Domain Hijackers Lose * http://save.unicom.com/
24 matches
Mail list logo
