On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 11:03:57 +0100 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I find it interesting how many people are concerned with sending email
> to gmail users yet are quite willing to send email to public mailing
> lists that are archived and indexed by Google.
There is in most cases a significantly lo
Hell, I couldn't even log into it. The system was "Temporarily
unavailable" when I tried.
Curtis
Petri Helenius wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone really believe that people will use
gmail as their one and only email account? Perhaps they
are really using it for trading DIVX encoded mo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone really believe that people will use
gmail as their one and only email account? Perhaps they
are really using it for trading DIVX encoded movies.
After all, the cost of sending a DIVX encoded movie from
one gmail.com mailbox to another gmail.com mailbox is
relati
> And here I thought I was the only one to seriously consider blocking
gmail
> (to and from) because of the security implications.
I find it interesting how many people are concerned with
sending email to gmail users yet are quite willing to send
email to public mailing lists that are archived
On Sep 12, 2004, at 8:05 AM, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
Maybe those of you who created accounts using the links provided by
todd
could post some invites.
NOOO! No more Gmail on NANOG!
Before anyone does such a moronic thing, please note that all people
subscribed here, or reading the
Nakul Malik wrote:
Maybe those of you who created accounts using the links provided by todd
could post some invites.
-Nakul
Before anyone does such a moronic thing, please note that all people
subscribed here, or reading the archives, now and for the future have
access to the accounts from tho
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Todd Mitchell - lists
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2004 11:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 30 Gmail Invites
The weekend is quiet and I know that many of the people on this list
still desire a gmail invite/account. So, here's a list of 30 invites.
First come,
> I'm with Paul on the "makes sense" to run your own personal mail server
> - for me, and others who _can_ run their own mail server. For those
> who can't, public mail servers are all "scary". Gmail is no more scary
> than hotmail, yahoo, msn, verizon, earthlink, or any of a billion other
> m
On Sep 11, 2004, at 11:40 PM, Daniel Senie wrote:
And here I thought I was the only one to seriously consider blocking
gmail (to and from) because of the security implications.
Hope you are blocking every non-personal mail server on the planet.
I'm with Paul on the "makes sense" to run your own pe
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 11 21:58:47 2004
> From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Paul Vixie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: 30 Gmail Invites
> Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 22:54:16 -0400
>
>
>
At 10:54 PM 9/11/2004, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul Vixie writes:
>
>i still can't understand why anyone would want a gmail account, free or not.
>
>not just "anyone on nanog". anyone, anywhere, ever. the reasons "why not"
>are compelling enough. but there are n
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul Vixie writes:
>
>i still can't understand why anyone would want a gmail account, free or not.
>
>not just "anyone on nanog". anyone, anywhere, ever. the reasons "why not"
>are compelling enough. but there are no counterbalancing reasons "why to",
>either com
On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 22:33:40 -0400 Chris Brenton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-09-11 at 22:26, Paul Vixie wrote:
> >
> > i still can't understand why anyone would want a gmail account, free or not.
> But..but..but..it's "special". You have to be invited. ;-)
well, i think at this p
On Sat, 2004-09-11 at 22:26, Paul Vixie wrote:
>
> i still can't understand why anyone would want a gmail account, free or not.
But..but..but..it's "special". You have to be invited. ;-)
C
i still can't understand why anyone would want a gmail account, free or not.
not just "anyone on nanog". anyone, anywhere, ever. the reasons "why not"
are compelling enough. but there are no counterbalancing reasons "why to",
either compelling or otherwise.
i just don't get it. the approach
On 09/11/04, some dork with a gmail account wrote:
> The weekend is quiet and I know that many of the people on this list
> still desire a gmail invite/account. So, here's a list of 30 invites.
> First come, first serve. Please use only one invite and save the rest
> for others.
Ho
On Sat, Sep 11, 2004 at 11:44:10AM -0600, Todd Mitchell - lists wrote:
>
> The weekend is quiet and I know that many of the people on this list
[snip]
'Quiet' isn't a bad thing. In an operations context it is a GOOD
thing. Please don't mistake volume for value.
Followup to /dev/null.
--
The weekend is quiet and I know that many of the people on this list
still desire a gmail invite/account. So, here's a list of 30 invites.
First come, first serve. Please use only one invite and save the rest
for others.
Enjoy.
Todd
18 matches
Mail list logo
